DCX annouces AWD LX pricing
07-12-2004 | 05:45 PM
#1
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,817
From: O-Town
DCX annouces AWD LX pricing [Now with pics]
Here is the press release.
2005 AWD Dodge Magnum SXT Model
The Manufacturer's Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) for the 2005 AWD Dodge Magnum SXT model is $27,900 (excluding $625 destination). This includes the added front differential, transfer case and all-wheel-drive front suspension, a five-speed automatic transmission with AutoStick®, 18-inch wheels and touring tires, performance disk brakes and a 19-gallon fuel tank with the 3.5-liter V-6 High Output engine.
2005 AWD Dodge Magnum RT Model
The MSRP for the 2005 AWD Dodge Magnum RT model is $31,370 (excluding $625 destination). This includes the addition of the front differential, transfer case and all-wheel-drive front suspension. (The five-speed automatic transmission, 18-inch wheels and touring tires, performance disk brakes and 19-gallon fuel tank already are included as standard equipment on the Dodge Magnum RT.)
2005 AWD Chrysler 300 Touring Model
The MSRP for the 2005 AWD Chrysler 300 Touring model is $29,370 (excluding $625 destination). The added front differential, transfer case and all-wheel- drive front suspension, a five-speed automatic transmission with AutoStick, 18-inch wheels and touring tires, performance disk brakes and a 19-gallon fuel tank are included with the 3.5-liter V-6 High Output engine on the AWD Chrysler 300 Touring model.
2005 Chrysler 300 Limited AWD Option
The 2005 Chrysler 300 Limited will be offered as an all-wheel-drive vehicle through an option package. In addition to the Limited model's standard equipment, this package will add the front differential, transfer case and all-wheel-drive front suspension, a five-speed automatic transmission with AutoStick, 18-inch wheels and touring tires, performance disk brakes and a 19-gallon fuel tank with the 3.5-liter V-6 High Output engine. The MSRP for 2005 Chrysler 300 Limited vehicles with the AWD option is $31,215 (excluding $625 destination).
2005 AWD Chrysler 300C Model
The MSRP for the 2005 AWD Chrysler 300C model is $34,195 (excluding $625 destination). This includes the addition of the front differential, transfer case and all-wheel-drive front suspension and 18-inch wheels. (The five-speed automatic transmission, touring tires, performance disk brakes and 19-gallon fuel tank already are included as standard equipment on the Chrysler 300C.)
The Manufacturer's Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) for the 2005 AWD Dodge Magnum SXT model is $27,900 (excluding $625 destination). This includes the added front differential, transfer case and all-wheel-drive front suspension, a five-speed automatic transmission with AutoStick®, 18-inch wheels and touring tires, performance disk brakes and a 19-gallon fuel tank with the 3.5-liter V-6 High Output engine.
2005 AWD Dodge Magnum RT Model
The MSRP for the 2005 AWD Dodge Magnum RT model is $31,370 (excluding $625 destination). This includes the addition of the front differential, transfer case and all-wheel-drive front suspension. (The five-speed automatic transmission, 18-inch wheels and touring tires, performance disk brakes and 19-gallon fuel tank already are included as standard equipment on the Dodge Magnum RT.)
2005 AWD Chrysler 300 Touring Model
The MSRP for the 2005 AWD Chrysler 300 Touring model is $29,370 (excluding $625 destination). The added front differential, transfer case and all-wheel- drive front suspension, a five-speed automatic transmission with AutoStick, 18-inch wheels and touring tires, performance disk brakes and a 19-gallon fuel tank are included with the 3.5-liter V-6 High Output engine on the AWD Chrysler 300 Touring model.
2005 Chrysler 300 Limited AWD Option
The 2005 Chrysler 300 Limited will be offered as an all-wheel-drive vehicle through an option package. In addition to the Limited model's standard equipment, this package will add the front differential, transfer case and all-wheel-drive front suspension, a five-speed automatic transmission with AutoStick, 18-inch wheels and touring tires, performance disk brakes and a 19-gallon fuel tank with the 3.5-liter V-6 High Output engine. The MSRP for 2005 Chrysler 300 Limited vehicles with the AWD option is $31,215 (excluding $625 destination).
2005 AWD Chrysler 300C Model
The MSRP for the 2005 AWD Chrysler 300C model is $34,195 (excluding $625 destination). This includes the addition of the front differential, transfer case and all-wheel-drive front suspension and 18-inch wheels. (The five-speed automatic transmission, touring tires, performance disk brakes and 19-gallon fuel tank already are included as standard equipment on the Chrysler 300C.)
Last edited by mastrdrver; 07-16-2004 at 01:50 AM.
07-12-2004 | 08:20 PM
#3
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,711
From: The Golden State
Let me get this straight.
I can get an AWD, Hemi powered, Chrysler 300C for about $5,000 LESS than the list on a front wheel drive V6 Buick Park Avenue, and for just about the same out-the-door price of a loaded front wheel drive Pontiac Bonneville, also with a V6?
..........dayum! I'm glad I didn't sell off my Chrysler stock last year!
I can get an AWD, Hemi powered, Chrysler 300C for about $5,000 LESS than the list on a front wheel drive V6 Buick Park Avenue, and for just about the same out-the-door price of a loaded front wheel drive Pontiac Bonneville, also with a V6?
..........dayum! I'm glad I didn't sell off my Chrysler stock last year!
07-16-2004 | 01:51 AM
#5
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,817
From: O-Town
07-16-2004 | 11:52 AM
#9
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,724
From: Hebron, KY
But do you need it?
Originally posted by PaperTarget
This goes back to that article that was posted awhile back. We're going to be seeing more and more AWD cars. The technology for AWD is getting better and better.
This goes back to that article that was posted awhile back. We're going to be seeing more and more AWD cars. The technology for AWD is getting better and better.
The perception for Joe Consumer is that awd is safer. Auto makers exploit this in advertising: "The new Mercury Monstrosity featuring all-wheel drive delivers improved braking and cornering." All-wheel drive doesn't aid either, but it sounds good. You could also argue such buyers drive their vehicles more aggressively feeling awd is going to bail them out.
Unless you consistently drive in deep, unplowed snow, most do not need awd which adds unnecessary weight and detracts from fuel economy.
Last edited by jrp4uc; 07-16-2004 at 11:56 AM.
07-16-2004 | 11:56 AM
#10
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,711
From: The Golden State
Originally posted by morb|d
the oddest thing just happened. i was reading this thread and had to double check if i didn't follow a link from camaroz28.com and ended up at a Chrysler fan site.
the oddest thing just happened. i was reading this thread and had to double check if i didn't follow a link from camaroz28.com and ended up at a Chrysler fan site.
Short of GTO, GM doesn't have any affordable RWD cars at the moment.
Can't exactly go offline till GM brings these cars back, can we?
07-16-2004 | 01:57 PM
#11
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,029
Re: But do you need it?
Originally posted by jrp4uc
Manfufactures also notice it as something buyers want. A large portion of the SUVs selling have awd. Does this mean they need it?
Manfufactures also notice it as something buyers want. A large portion of the SUVs selling have awd. Does this mean they need it?
Originally posted by jrp4uc
The perception for Joe Consumer is that awd is safer. Auto makers exploit this in advertising: "The new Mercury Monstrosity featuring all-wheel drive delivers improved braking and cornering." All-wheel drive doesn't aid either, but it sounds good. You could also argue such buyers drive their vehicles more aggressively feeling awd is going to bail them out.
The perception for Joe Consumer is that awd is safer. Auto makers exploit this in advertising: "The new Mercury Monstrosity featuring all-wheel drive delivers improved braking and cornering." All-wheel drive doesn't aid either, but it sounds good. You could also argue such buyers drive their vehicles more aggressively feeling awd is going to bail them out.
Originally posted by jrp4uc
Unless you consistently drive in deep, unplowed snow, most do not need awd which adds unnecessary weight and detracts from fuel economy.
Unless you consistently drive in deep, unplowed snow, most do not need awd which adds unnecessary weight and detracts from fuel economy.
07-16-2004 | 02:14 PM
#12
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,724
From: Hebron, KY
Re: Re: But do you need it?
Originally posted by PaperTarget
We don't need Camaros, Mustangs, Chargers, etc...we could all drive little steal boxes.
The perception is reality. AWD IS safer. But like anything else, you have to know what its limits are. AWD does aid in cornering, I can prove it to you if you'd like to take a ride in my car. AWD cars also post some of the, if not the, fastest lane change times of any type of car. I see what you're saying though. For most buyers it's not going to make a difference (except perhaps in bad weather). Personally I notice the difference even on dry pavement...
This was already covered in a another post in this forum. Many AWD myths and exaggerations will continue to exist in the uninformed public. Do some research, you might be impressed with how far along AWD has come.
We don't need Camaros, Mustangs, Chargers, etc...we could all drive little steal boxes.
The perception is reality. AWD IS safer. But like anything else, you have to know what its limits are. AWD does aid in cornering, I can prove it to you if you'd like to take a ride in my car. AWD cars also post some of the, if not the, fastest lane change times of any type of car. I see what you're saying though. For most buyers it's not going to make a difference (except perhaps in bad weather). Personally I notice the difference even on dry pavement...
This was already covered in a another post in this forum. Many AWD myths and exaggerations will continue to exist in the uninformed public. Do some research, you might be impressed with how far along AWD has come.
I'm not attempting to start another awd debate. Simply stating, the increased offering of awd is less likely tied to manufacturers offering great new technology as much as capitalizing on what is popular.
07-16-2004 | 03:15 PM
#13
Registered User
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 2,801
From: Nashville, TN
Look at it this way, more AWD car offerings stand to reduce demand for 4x4 SUVs, as some buyers just want the inclement weather capabilities of AWD.
When we bought the 99 Blazer, we looked at 2 and 4wd models. Went with the 4. Now it only snows really bad maybe 1 time every 3 years here, but it was sure nice to have 4wd that day. Also nice to switch it to auto-4wd when its really raining hard and have some more confidence that if you hit a big spot of standing water you will be able to better maintain vehicle control.
Now imagine something like the Magnum, which offers most of the daily practicality of a small SUV plus the confidence of AWD....why would you buy a massive, obstructive, gas hoarding SUV vs that?
To me its just a further blurring the lines between the traditional car and SUV/truck segments.
When we bought the 99 Blazer, we looked at 2 and 4wd models. Went with the 4. Now it only snows really bad maybe 1 time every 3 years here, but it was sure nice to have 4wd that day. Also nice to switch it to auto-4wd when its really raining hard and have some more confidence that if you hit a big spot of standing water you will be able to better maintain vehicle control.
Now imagine something like the Magnum, which offers most of the daily practicality of a small SUV plus the confidence of AWD....why would you buy a massive, obstructive, gas hoarding SUV vs that?
To me its just a further blurring the lines between the traditional car and SUV/truck segments.
07-16-2004 | 04:26 PM
#14
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,958
From: Kansas City, MO
Originally posted by jrp4uc
I thought Chrysler was holding off on the Touring (wagon) for the US?
I thought Chrysler was holding off on the Touring (wagon) for the US?
http://www.chrysler.com/300/features...?model=touring
Gets you the 3.5 liter, ESP, ABS, and some other goodies.
07-16-2004 | 05:04 PM
#15
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 10,285
From: Albany, NY
Re: Re: But do you need it?
Originally posted by PaperTarget
The perception is reality. AWD IS safer. But like anything else, you have to know what its limits are. AWD does aid in cornering, I can prove it to you if you'd like to take a ride in my car. AWD cars also post some of the, if not the, fastest lane change times of any type of car. I see what you're saying though. For most buyers it's not going to make a difference (except perhaps in bad weather). Personally I notice the difference even on dry pavement...
This was already covered in a another post in this forum. Many AWD myths and exaggerations will continue to exist in the uninformed public. Do some research, you might be impressed with how far along AWD has come.
The perception is reality. AWD IS safer. But like anything else, you have to know what its limits are. AWD does aid in cornering, I can prove it to you if you'd like to take a ride in my car. AWD cars also post some of the, if not the, fastest lane change times of any type of car. I see what you're saying though. For most buyers it's not going to make a difference (except perhaps in bad weather). Personally I notice the difference even on dry pavement...
This was already covered in a another post in this forum. Many AWD myths and exaggerations will continue to exist in the uninformed public. Do some research, you might be impressed with how far along AWD has come.