Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

Hatchback vs. Trunk

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-22-2003 | 09:57 PM
  #61  
danno02SS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 420
From: Pasadena,CA,USA
Originally posted by BigDarknFast
I wish I had time to read this thread right now! But too much to do. Let me just say I agree with the first post, by WERM, and the one right above from Jason E.

Here's my 99 Formula holding an obscene amount of lumber...

http://mwshowgo67.com/formula99/utility.htm
Excellent example. "This car really hauls. No really!" Now imagine the additional utility an IRS would provide. 60/40 flat folding rear seats. We're talking near mini-van cargo room here. I'm for the notchback design. The key to keeping this design from looking weird is a short deck. The SSX looks great, can't really tell it's a hatch.
Old 07-26-2003 | 08:52 AM
  #62  
guess who's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 562
From: Mich.
The scary part about that lumber is its MDF.Which is heavy as a mo fo.(It is MDF isnt it?)
The part of that site thats funny is the baby in the car seat (very cute BTW),Would you want to sit that close to the airbag if u were the pass?Im not flaming here just asking a ?.
Me and my wife traded in our SVT Contour due to our childs car seat needing room and my wife didnt like sitting that close to the air bag,I cant say I blame her but the child didnt use the seat long enough to justify a new SuperCrew purchase in my mind,But hey we all know how women can be .......
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Aaront810
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
13
08-29-2020 09:34 PM
Bxlt1
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
7
07-18-2015 02:48 PM
240ssLs3
Parts For Sale
0
07-13-2015 05:06 PM
squarehead
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
0
11-21-2014 08:02 PM



Quick Reply: Hatchback vs. Trunk



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:26 AM.