A little reality check regarding the F5 Camaro
#46
A lot of folks are talking about the advantage of ABS in the snow. In my experience this is the one area where non ABS equipped cars perform better. My previous vehicle with snow tires and non-ABS stopped better in the snow then my current vehicle with ABS and the exact same tires( not same kind, the same physical tire!!). The ABS keeps releasing pressure because the tire is not turning.
Well I rather have a tire not turning that is generating some kind of friction with the ground rather then a tire that is continuously being allowed to roll freely...
Now in the summer or in rain, give me ABS. I wish it was defeatable like traction control. ABS in the winter makes me increase my following distance because I have less confidence in my ability to stop the vehicle.
Jason
Well I rather have a tire not turning that is generating some kind of friction with the ground rather then a tire that is continuously being allowed to roll freely...
Now in the summer or in rain, give me ABS. I wish it was defeatable like traction control. ABS in the winter makes me increase my following distance because I have less confidence in my ability to stop the vehicle.
Jason
#47
Originally posted by dabear95
A lot of folks are talking about the advantage of ABS in the snow. In my experience this is the one area where non ABS equipped cars perform better. My previous vehicle with snow tires and non-ABS stopped better in the snow then my current vehicle with ABS and the exact same tires( not same kind, the same physical tire!!). The ABS keeps releasing pressure because the tire is not turning.
Well I rather have a tire not turning that is generating some kind of friction with the ground rather then a tire that is continuously being allowed to roll freely...
Jason
A lot of folks are talking about the advantage of ABS in the snow. In my experience this is the one area where non ABS equipped cars perform better. My previous vehicle with snow tires and non-ABS stopped better in the snow then my current vehicle with ABS and the exact same tires( not same kind, the same physical tire!!). The ABS keeps releasing pressure because the tire is not turning.
Well I rather have a tire not turning that is generating some kind of friction with the ground rather then a tire that is continuously being allowed to roll freely...
Jason
That object of the game in non-ABS cars in the snow is to pump the brakes to gain control, and bring the car to a stop... the computer in a ABS system can accomplish this much more consistantly and is a shorter distance than any human.
#48
Originally posted by Chewbacca
I used to feel that you take abuse in other areas of this board that is totally uncalled for. I'm beginning to re-evaluate that mind set....
I used to feel that you take abuse in other areas of this board that is totally uncalled for. I'm beginning to re-evaluate that mind set....
1) So anyone who doesn't prefer T tops is not an educated co]
nsumer? What an incredibly ignorant comment from someone who is supposedly in tune with the industry.
2) Hard to sell? I've had more than a handful of people flag me down over the years and make unsolicited offers on my car.
[b]KBB Used Car Retail Report on a 2000 V6 Camaro All the same options/mileage..
No T-tops=$12,685
T-tops=$13,620
Private Party
No T-tops=$10,680
T-tops=$11,495
There is proof that a T-top car not only looks better but is a better investment as almost all the price of teh option can be expected to be recouped by having it.
]
3) You're worried about resale value with these cars? And you still bought a six cylinder?
You probaly have a V8 hardtop..those are different like I said because there are gains in having a fixed roof.
I see plenty of people out there converting hardtop cars to T-tops...don'r recall any t-top cars being converted to hardtops...if possible it was probaly only done in an all out drag car.
]
4) Ugly? Appearance is highly subjective. However, what about your lumpy T top roof? I won't even get into the tacked on appearance of the "sport package".
I personally don't like how high the Camaro sits...it looks like a Sebring on steriods and has too much ground clearence..and I think the sport appearence package helps alot to solve that problem.
Lumpy T-top roof WTF?....you have to be kiding me?
*shakes head and walks away*
#49
Originally posted by Darth Xed
Also, to use your Black Ice example (Or snow... or mud... or rain... or whatever!) ...... how well do you think you'll do if you are trying to STOP on black ice without ABS? At least the ABS will give you a fighting chance, and even offer some steerablility in the situation! If you do not know the HUGE VALUE of ABS, you shouldn't even be discussing cars at all.
Also, to use your Black Ice example (Or snow... or mud... or rain... or whatever!) ...... how well do you think you'll do if you are trying to STOP on black ice without ABS? At least the ABS will give you a fighting chance, and even offer some steerablility in the situation! If you do not know the HUGE VALUE of ABS, you shouldn't even be discussing cars at all.
Besides, why are trying to kill safety features on a car that already has outrageous insurance? If nothing else, a Camaro-type car should come with more safety equipment than the average car to compensate for the accident-prone audience it attracts. I wonder if attitudes of being better than ABS, ASR systems, etc and just generally, "I know what I'm doing" have anything to do with accidents and high premiums for the rest of us are left to endure.
#50
Originally posted by dabear95
Well I rather have a tire not turning that is generating some kind of friction with the ground rather then a tire that is continuously being allowed to roll freely...
Jason
Well I rather have a tire not turning that is generating some kind of friction with the ground rather then a tire that is continuously being allowed to roll freely...
Jason
My '96 + ABS + snow/slush + no snow tires = tires keep turning and I've been able to steer (albeit clumsily due to the ABS action) around the obstacle (suddenly spinning cars, kids sledding, curbs)
#51
Originally posted by Darth Xed
Also, to use your Black Ice example (Or snow... or mud... or rain... or whatever!) ...... how well do you think you'll do if you are trying to STOP on black ice without ABS? At least the ABS will give you a fighting chance, and even offer some steerablility in the situation! If you do not know the HUGE VALUE of ABS, you shouldn't even be discussing cars at all.
Also, to use your Black Ice example (Or snow... or mud... or rain... or whatever!) ...... how well do you think you'll do if you are trying to STOP on black ice without ABS? At least the ABS will give you a fighting chance, and even offer some steerablility in the situation! If you do not know the HUGE VALUE of ABS, you shouldn't even be discussing cars at all.
First off traction control in a V6 car has noting to do with ABS *i think* because it is teh two stage system that simply cuts the throttle. The individual wheel braking only happens on the V8 and is a function of the ABS.. To quote Redplanet
There is a difference in the sytems between V6 (2 phase) and V8 (three phase.)
Both have a throttle kickback...which causes the gas pedal to 'kick back' at you to let you know that traction control has been engaged. A light on the I.P. will also illuminate.
Both have a 'throttle relaxer' (no, I didn;t make up that term...) This reduces the timing and will bring the car down almost to idle -- to stop the rear wheel from spinning -- regardless of how hard you push on the gas pedal. (feels kinda weird.........)
The V8, however, also is tied into the braking system.....after throttle kickback, the brake is applied to whichever rear wheel is spinning, thereby assuring that the power is delivered to the other rear wheel via the zexel-torsen differential.
Naturally, both systems have the on/off switch (for those of us who like to 'smoke 'em' once in a while)....but additionally, there are times -- esp. in deep snow where it is necessary to build up speed to go thru deep snow and throttle relaxer would not be desired..... This would also apply to where you would desire to 'rock' the car back and forth to get out of, say a ditch (what were you doing there in the first place, huh????) or very deep snow.
The V8 system is a very good system and saves a lot of people from fish-tailing (unexpectedly) on wet roads or roads that have sand or other material that deteriorate traction.
I've said it before and I'll say it again...I don't care HOW good a driver you are (or think you are) the traction control should be left on while driving unless, of course, you are at a track or have reason to want to 'chirp 'em or
Both have a throttle kickback...which causes the gas pedal to 'kick back' at you to let you know that traction control has been engaged. A light on the I.P. will also illuminate.
Both have a 'throttle relaxer' (no, I didn;t make up that term...) This reduces the timing and will bring the car down almost to idle -- to stop the rear wheel from spinning -- regardless of how hard you push on the gas pedal. (feels kinda weird.........)
The V8, however, also is tied into the braking system.....after throttle kickback, the brake is applied to whichever rear wheel is spinning, thereby assuring that the power is delivered to the other rear wheel via the zexel-torsen differential.
Naturally, both systems have the on/off switch (for those of us who like to 'smoke 'em' once in a while)....but additionally, there are times -- esp. in deep snow where it is necessary to build up speed to go thru deep snow and throttle relaxer would not be desired..... This would also apply to where you would desire to 'rock' the car back and forth to get out of, say a ditch (what were you doing there in the first place, huh????) or very deep snow.
The V8 system is a very good system and saves a lot of people from fish-tailing (unexpectedly) on wet roads or roads that have sand or other material that deteriorate traction.
I've said it before and I'll say it again...I don't care HOW good a driver you are (or think you are) the traction control should be left on while driving unless, of course, you are at a track or have reason to want to 'chirp 'em or
Far as black ice...the only way through ice is to let off the gas which ASR does...once you get on the brakes ABS or not you better be saying Hail Mary's
As for the camaro's wheels teh Mustang has upgraded machined wheels in the premium package...i would consider that the equivelent of chrome wheels on the Camaro. You also for got to add Monsoon...it may look like only a few bucks here and there but IMO it is fair to say a Mustang V6 will be at least $2,000 cheaper than a similarly equiped Camaro V6
#52
Originally posted by formula79
KBB Used Car Retail Report on a 2000 V6 Camaro All the same options/mileage..
No T-tops=$12,685
T-tops=$13,620
Private Party
No T-tops=$10,680
T-tops=$11,495
There is proof that a T-top car not only looks better but is a better investment as almost all the price of teh option can be expected to be recouped by having it.
KBB Used Car Retail Report on a 2000 V6 Camaro All the same options/mileage..
No T-tops=$12,685
T-tops=$13,620
Private Party
No T-tops=$10,680
T-tops=$11,495
There is proof that a T-top car not only looks better but is a better investment as almost all the price of teh option can be expected to be recouped by having it.
That's why the car has a roughly $1000 (actually a little less) resale value!!
You need a clue on some of this stuff!
#53
Originally posted by formula79
The average V6 buyer (i.e. young buyer) would rate T-tops as a must have option. No one who No buys a V6 Camaro (which they bought because of the image) wants to constantly hear "how come you didn't get T-tops"?
The average V6 buyer (i.e. young buyer) would rate T-tops as a must have option. No one who No buys a V6 Camaro (which they bought because of the image) wants to constantly hear "how come you didn't get T-tops"?
I'm also not a fan of the appearance package and tape on spoiler.
As for not finding a V8, why not just pick up a year old used car that's still under warranty versus making such a big sacrifice in a V6? Having a '02 "The Last year made" isn't going to do anything for it's value for such a mass-produced, non-limited edition car.
#54
Originally posted by Chewbacca
My '91 + no ABS + snow/slush + no snow tires = locked wheels, loss of steering control and a few off road excursions (luckily not even a scratch)
My '96 + ABS + snow/slush + no snow tires = tires keep turning and I've been able to steer (albeit clumsily due to the ABS action) around the obstacle (suddenly spinning cars, kids sledding, curbs)
My '91 + no ABS + snow/slush + no snow tires = locked wheels, loss of steering control and a few off road excursions (luckily not even a scratch)
My '96 + ABS + snow/slush + no snow tires = tires keep turning and I've been able to steer (albeit clumsily due to the ABS action) around the obstacle (suddenly spinning cars, kids sledding, curbs)
Take speed out the equation and suddenly things get easier when something does happen..even though it is less likely to because you are going slower.
i like ASR and ABS...but I have seen so many people use them as an electronic blanket to make them feel confident about driving like idiots in the snow.
#55
Originally posted by formula79
Man here we go...
First off traction control in a V6 car has noting to do with ABS *i think* because it is teh two stage system that simply cuts the throttle. The individual wheel braking only happens on the V8 and is a function of the ABS.. To quote Redplanet
Anyway I said I have no problem with ABS or ASR..but they are not "Must Have" options..and ASR is really the more important of the two to me.
Far as black ice...the only way through ice is to let off the gas which ASR does...once you get on the brakes ABS or not you better be saying Hail Mary's.
As for the camaro's wheels teh Mustang has upgraded machined wheels in the premium package...i would consider that the equivelent of chrome wheels on the Camaro. You also for got to add Monsoon...it may look like only a few bucks here and there but IMO it is fair to say a Mustang V6 will be at least $2,000 cheaper than a similarly equiped Camaro V6
Man here we go...
First off traction control in a V6 car has noting to do with ABS *i think* because it is teh two stage system that simply cuts the throttle. The individual wheel braking only happens on the V8 and is a function of the ABS.. To quote Redplanet
Anyway I said I have no problem with ABS or ASR..but they are not "Must Have" options..and ASR is really the more important of the two to me.
Far as black ice...the only way through ice is to let off the gas which ASR does...once you get on the brakes ABS or not you better be saying Hail Mary's.
As for the camaro's wheels teh Mustang has upgraded machined wheels in the premium package...i would consider that the equivelent of chrome wheels on the Camaro. You also for got to add Monsoon...it may look like only a few bucks here and there but IMO it is fair to say a Mustang V6 will be at least $2,000 cheaper than a similarly equiped Camaro V6
Pure ignornace.
#56
Originally posted by Darth Xed
And do you realize T-Tops cost over $1000 to get?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?
That's why the car has a roughly $1000 (actually a little less) resale value!!
You need a clue on some of this stuff!
And do you realize T-Tops cost over $1000 to get?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?
That's why the car has a roughly $1000 (actually a little less) resale value!!
You need a clue on some of this stuff!
Your the one not making no sense....I don;t think most options hold thier entire manufactuer cost in reslae value over the life of teh car..seems the t-tops hold it well..
#57
Originally posted by formula79
See I have had trouble in the snow with non ABS i have found teh best solution to be slow the **** down and don't follow so close!
Take speed out the equation and suddenly things get easier when something does happen..even though it is less likely to because you are going slower.
i like ASR and ABS...but I have seen so many people use them as an electronic blanket to make them feel confident about driving like idiots in the snow.
See I have had trouble in the snow with non ABS i have found teh best solution to be slow the **** down and don't follow so close!
Take speed out the equation and suddenly things get easier when something does happen..even though it is less likely to because you are going slower.
i like ASR and ABS...but I have seen so many people use them as an electronic blanket to make them feel confident about driving like idiots in the snow.
Fact is, even if you drive slow, with proper distance, you can find your self in an unseen emergency situation where this equipment will save your hide.
#58
Originally posted by formula79
Hrmm..using that argument since I paid $21,000 for my car it should still sell for $21,000 in 3 years right?
Hrmm..using that argument since I paid $21,000 for my car it should still sell for $21,000 in 3 years right?
Your the one not making no sense....I don;t think most options hold thier entire manufactuer cost in reslae value over the life of teh car..seems the t-tops hold it well..
But that doesn't make the other car a waste wihtout them.
If you pay an extra THOUSAND DOLLARS, just to LOSE $100 more, you are just blind.
T-Tops do not add to your value, they just lose their value slighty slower than the other options on your car.
You do see that you lost $100 on the t-tops in your example, right?
#59
Originally posted by jrp4uc
I'm also not a fan of the appearance package and tape on spoiler.
I'm also not a fan of the appearance package and tape on spoiler.
As for not finding a V8, why not just pick up a year old used car that's still under warranty versus making such a big sacrifice in a V6? Having a '02 "The Last year made" isn't going to do anything for it's value for such a mass-produced, non-limited edition car. [/B][/QUOTE]
My god if I have to explain this one more time I will stick my head in the worlds largest pencil sharpener. I was $2K upside down on my Firebird because I put 40,000 miles on it 6 months...I needed a new car with all of the rebates to suck up the extra $2K on a car. If I bought like a 98 Z for $14,000 and then tacked on the $2,000 i was upside down and $1,500 tax tags and title I would ahve been trying to finance a $14,000 car for $17,500 which most banks won't let you do.
As for Darth...all you are gonna do is have the exact oposite veiw of me..so I don't know why i argue.
#60
[QUOTE]Originally posted by formula79
[b]
T-top cars are harder to sell..Ask any used car dealer. With teh V8's there are weight savings so hardtops can be justified...but on the V6 car, buying T-tops says one of two things.."I am cheap" or "couldn't afford T-tops". The average V6 buyer (i.e. young buyer) would rate T-tops as a must have option. No one who No buys a V6 Camaro (which they bought because of the image) wants to constantly hear "how come you didn't get T-tops"?[b]
HUH? Harder to sell....but everybody wants them? Wouldn't saving weight be more justified on the lower powered six? I'm a little confused by this whole paragraph.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ohh...sound like you have a little !t-top! syndrome there...
Uhhh no, I specifically ordered (and waited and waited for) my car that way.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You probaly have a V8 hardtop..those are different like I said because there are gains in having a fixed roof.
Again, why would there not be a greater gain for a six?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I see plenty of people out there converting hardtop cars to T-tops...don'r recall any t-top cars being converted to hardtops...if possible it was probaly only done in an all out drag car.
I guess you "educated" them to the point that they decided to cut their car up.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To be honest I only get "tacked on" comments from non-Sport appearence package V8 owners.
Hmmm, would that be a little !V8! syndrome rearing its ugly head?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lumpy T-top roof WTF?....you have to be kiding me?
Sigh, no I'm not kidding. As I stated looks are subjective.
[b]
T-top cars are harder to sell..Ask any used car dealer. With teh V8's there are weight savings so hardtops can be justified...but on the V6 car, buying T-tops says one of two things.."I am cheap" or "couldn't afford T-tops". The average V6 buyer (i.e. young buyer) would rate T-tops as a must have option. No one who No buys a V6 Camaro (which they bought because of the image) wants to constantly hear "how come you didn't get T-tops"?[b]
HUH? Harder to sell....but everybody wants them? Wouldn't saving weight be more justified on the lower powered six? I'm a little confused by this whole paragraph.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ohh...sound like you have a little !t-top! syndrome there...
Uhhh no, I specifically ordered (and waited and waited for) my car that way.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You probaly have a V8 hardtop..those are different like I said because there are gains in having a fixed roof.
Again, why would there not be a greater gain for a six?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I see plenty of people out there converting hardtop cars to T-tops...don'r recall any t-top cars being converted to hardtops...if possible it was probaly only done in an all out drag car.
I guess you "educated" them to the point that they decided to cut their car up.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To be honest I only get "tacked on" comments from non-Sport appearence package V8 owners.
Hmmm, would that be a little !V8! syndrome rearing its ugly head?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lumpy T-top roof WTF?....you have to be kiding me?
Sigh, no I'm not kidding. As I stated looks are subjective.