Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

New Gearbox Shifts In Zero Milliseconds!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-29-2005 | 07:36 PM
  #91  
buzz12586's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,357
From: Charlotte, NC
Re: New Gearbox Shifts In Zero Milliseconds!

Give me my good old manual. Rowing through the gears never gets old. Pretty soon cars will drive themselves and all the fun of it will be gone. Long live the manual.

Last edited by buzz12586; 09-29-2005 at 07:56 PM.
Old 04-28-2006 | 10:54 AM
  #92  
matt65's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 491
From: Lincoln, AL
Re: New Gearbox Shifts In Zero Milliseconds!

I love my DSG in the TDi (see sig). Upshifts in 8ms.

Last edited by matt65; 05-04-2006 at 11:51 PM.
Old 04-28-2006 | 11:02 AM
  #93  
Threxx's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 1998
Posts: 4,334
From: Memphis
Re: New Gearbox Shifts In Zero Milliseconds!

More than two years has gone by since the member Zeroshift joined this website and spread a bunch of hype saying more or less, 'just wait and see'.

Well, I'd say 2+ years is waiting enough.

I'm ready to say this technology isn't ever going to end up in OEM vehicles. Maybe as a niche market mod, but that's about it.
Old 04-28-2006 | 11:31 AM
  #94  
96_Camaro_B4C's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,650
From: Indianapolis, IN
Re: New Gearbox Shifts In Zero Milliseconds!

Hmmm, the revival of this old, old thread prompted me to go to the website (www.zeroshift.com). There is definitely more content there than the last time I looked. There is a "demo video" that shows an '05 Mustang V6 that apparently has the technology, though it isn't extremely detailed. Worth taking a look at.
Old 04-28-2006 | 11:43 AM
  #95  
ImportedRoomate's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,647
From: Jupiter, FL
Re: New Gearbox Shifts In Zero Milliseconds!

Lol, I need to mark this on my calendar and bring it back every year for its anniversary.
Old 03-14-2007 | 12:44 PM
  #96  
ImportedRoomate's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,647
From: Jupiter, FL
Happy Anniversary!

Looks like they're still moving along... slowly...

http://www.zeroshift.com/

The water test video is pretty neat.
Old 03-14-2007 | 01:09 PM
  #97  
posaune's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 455
From: Stafford, Va
Originally Posted by ImportedRoomate
Happy Anniversary!

Looks like they're still moving along... slowly...

http://www.zeroshift.com/

The water test video is pretty neat.
Isn't this a day early?

still kinda cool.
Old 03-14-2007 | 01:13 PM
  #98  
ImportedRoomate's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,647
From: Jupiter, FL
Originally Posted by posaune
Isn't this a day early?

still kinda cool.
Nope, first post was on 3/14/2004
Old 03-14-2007 | 01:26 PM
  #99  
posaune's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 455
From: Stafford, Va
Originally Posted by ImportedRoomate
Nope, first post was on 3/14/2004
03-15-2004, 04:37 AM

maybe it is from the time difference.

still a cool idea and I liked the videos
Old 03-14-2007 | 01:27 PM
  #100  
JakeRobb's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 9,497
From: Okemos, MI
Heh... I didn't notice at first that this was three years old.
Old 03-14-2007 | 01:29 PM
  #101  
JakeRobb's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 9,497
From: Okemos, MI
Originally Posted by posaune
03-15-2004, 04:37 AM
Time zones. You're in Germany; it's several hours later there than it is in the U.S.
Old 03-14-2007 | 01:44 PM
  #102  
Threxx's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 1998
Posts: 4,334
From: Memphis
Originally Posted by centric
Someone needs to stop drinking the marketing kool-aid, and it ain't the ZeroShift rep.
I just wanted to reflect back on this comment was that directed from centric toward me for my skepticism over ZeroShift's marketing hype and contention that CVT/IVT had much more of a future.

Their website states (and has stated since February 2004)
"It is reasonable to expect that in 10 years time every car will be built with a gearbox operating in the ZeroShift principle"

Whelp, 3 years down, 6 years 10.5 months to go, guys.

So far there are 53 recent (2000+ MY) car models sold around the world with CVT/IVT transmissions as standard or optional with the most powerful being found in the Lexus LS600h flagship car with 450hp and AWD.

None with ZeroShift.

Old 03-14-2007 | 01:59 PM
  #103  
Threxx's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 1998
Posts: 4,334
From: Memphis
Originally Posted by Wikipedia article
A problem with the system is that when the transmission instantly shifts between 1st and 2nd gear, the engine, flywheel, and clutch will be spinning at a higher speed than the drive shaft, resulting in a large amount of inertia that must be relieved abruptly across the drive train.

One solution that Zeroshift is currently investigating is to automatically slip the clutch as the gear is changed, in order to stop engine torque transmission and to compensate for the extra inertia by 'dumping' it into the drivetrain. Currently the Zeroshift system is envisaged as a paddle-operated sequential manual transmission. However it could be implemented as a manual stick-controlled transmission where the clutch is used for manual control in low-speed manoeuvres but gearshifts are made without the clutch.
So basically they've gone to all of this effort to eliminate any 'slip' involved in the shift process itself, and now realized slip has to be built in somewhere or else you'll kill the rest of your drivetrain. So they've defeated the majority of their purpose by adding complication and mostly ending up right back where they left off.
Old 03-14-2007 | 04:19 PM
  #104  
soul strife's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 824
From: North of Cincy
Originally Posted by Threxx
So basically they've gone to all of this effort to eliminate any 'slip' involved in the shift process itself, and now realized slip has to be built in somewhere or else you'll kill the rest of your drivetrain. So they've defeated the majority of their purpose by adding complication and mostly ending up right back where they left off.
Yep, and probably adding weight. Which was a benefit in it's own right.
Old 03-14-2007 | 11:15 PM
  #105  
tls2000's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 169
From: Calgary, AB, Canada
Originally Posted by Threxx
So basically they've gone to all of this effort to eliminate any 'slip' involved in the shift process itself, and now realized slip has to be built in somewhere or else you'll kill the rest of your drivetrain. So they've defeated the majority of their purpose by adding complication and mostly ending up right back where they left off.
To top it off, anyone with a basic idea of how things works would know that you need time for the engine and driveshaft to slow down on an upshift or speed up on a downshift for the shift to be smooth.

So basically, it's impossible to complete a shift in 0ms without damaging something.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:55 PM.