Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

ZR1 Corvette... horsepower stalemate.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-02-2008, 09:18 PM
  #16  
Registered User
 
GTOJack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: SE MI
Posts: 976
Good article on the new ZR1 in the latest edition (12/24/07) of AutoWeek. It states that the curb weight should be about 3350 pounds, depending on equipment. The supercharger adds about 100 pounds to the cars nose, which would push the weight distribution to 52/48 F/R, even with lighter carbon fiber hood and front fenders. The ZO6 is 50/50. The rear tires are 335/25/R20 run flat Michelin Pilot Sport 2 on 12 inch wide Speedlines. Selective ride control will be standard. GM wants the car to be more of a daily driver than the all out track car ZO6.
GTOJack is offline  
Old 01-02-2008, 09:42 PM
  #17  
Registered User
 
Zigroid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Stroudsburg, PA
Posts: 948
where did GM have to add structural enhancements to hold the extra power and where does it say they did? Why doesn't the C6R.S (the 500 cube 600 hp one based off a Z06) gain any weight despite having a little less hp and the same torque? does that car not need structural enhancements to handle the power or does it just not utilize a supercharger and air to water heat exchanger that adds a significant amount of weight?

I don't get where you think it's only going to go 11.6 @ 129 unless the driver lifts at the 1000' mark. this car should trap well over 130 with ease. it weighs less than a 2008 viper while making more horsepower and torque. They seem to be running about 11.3 @ 129. with exhaust, air intake, and drag radials one has gone 10.7 @ 137.

which brings me to another point. the viper gained 100 hp but gained no weight. whats the reasoning for this?
Zigroid is offline  
Old 01-02-2008, 09:45 PM
  #18  
Registered User
 
jg95z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Oakland, California
Posts: 9,710
Originally Posted by 97z28/m6
but they could also do that with a 435hp camaro too.
That's not the point though, is it.
Originally Posted by guionM
Z06 weighs 3150.
ZR1 weighs 3400 pounds according to the car mags.
So you're suggesting the LS9 weighs 250lbs more than the LS7? I'm sorry but I don't buy it.
Originally Posted by guionM
OK. So the puropse of the ZR1 is to push the edge of technology. Having brakes that don't fade after repeated stops from 200 mph is something we will find we can't live without & use everyday. But the point still is, extra horsepower isn't gaining extra performance benefits. Sure, top speed benefits, but you aren't likely to ever see the top speed if it's over 155.
The point was to beat the Ferraris and Porsches of the world for far less money.
Originally Posted by guionM
As my point was, it's all become nothing more than a bragging contest with no practical gains.
That's only part of it.

Originally Posted by Chrome383Z
I'll buy the 400hp camaro and turn it into a 600hp Camaro myself.
I'm sorry but I want the factory warranty.

Originally Posted by Clean97Z
Anyone who can afford this car isn't going to be concerned about gas prices. If they are worried then they can't afford the car to begin with.
Exactly!
jg95z28 is offline  
Old 01-02-2008, 09:49 PM
  #19  
Registered User
 
Zigroid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Stroudsburg, PA
Posts: 948
The 2007 Mustang GT500
Supercharged DOHC V8.
Just over 500 horsepower.
0-60 in about 4.5 seconds.
12.9 1/4 mile @ just over 112 mph according to Motorweek.
8.4 seconds to go from 60 to 112, a 52 mph gain
The 2008 Shelby Super Snake
Again, a blown DOHC V8
About 600 horsepower.
0-60 in 4.4 seconds.
Quarter mile in 12.5 at 120 mph according to Road & Track (12/07).
8.1 seconds to go from 60 to 120, a 60 mph gain.

traction problems are the first 60 mph's issue. however when one car covers a tad over 50 mph difference in speed slower than the other car covers 60 mph difference in speed, there is a NOTICEABLE power difference.

a simple set of drag radials on each car would show their true differences.

what would you rather have, a 325 hp car that accelerates like a 500 hp car with traction problems, or a 500 hp car that will annihilate the 325 hp car with a $300 set of better tires?
Zigroid is offline  
Old 01-03-2008, 12:49 AM
  #20  
Registered User
 
bossco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: SeVa
Posts: 2,977
Originally Posted by Zigroid
what would you rather have, a 325 hp car that accelerates like a 500 hp car with traction problems, or a 500 hp car that will annihilate the 325 hp car with a $300 set of better tires?
Depends I suppose, in a straight line the 500hp car has the advantage, but thats about it, the suspension is pretty heavily taxed and the sorts of easy modifications that would allow the 325hp car to burn its *** in the twisties just wont do the same for the 500hp car.
bossco is offline  
Old 01-03-2008, 07:35 AM
  #21  
Registered User
 
GTOJack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: SE MI
Posts: 976
The Vipers additional horsepower comes naturally, without forced induction. Bigger bore, better heads and some things I forgot.
GTOJack is offline  
Old 01-03-2008, 07:58 AM
  #22  
Registered User
 
96_Camaro_B4C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 3,650
Originally Posted by GTOJack
The Vipers additional horsepower comes naturally, without forced induction. Bigger bore, better heads and some things I forgot.


And?
96_Camaro_B4C is offline  
Old 01-03-2008, 08:57 AM
  #23  
Registered User
 
JohnnyPappis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 291
Mag times always suck compared to what real world numbers can be with a skilled driver i thought that most of the performance community was aware of this history has proved it....and with bigger brakes a S/C and still retaining a full interior i think that the weight is pretty damn good!
JohnnyPappis is offline  
Old 01-03-2008, 09:24 AM
  #24  
Registered User
 
rlchv70's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 681
2 points:

1. I bet that the 2004 Cobra was underrated and closer to 500hp.

2. The HP curve has more to do with acceration than the peak.
rlchv70 is offline  
Old 01-03-2008, 09:26 AM
  #25  
Registered User
 
Gripenfelter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Posts: 3,647
The ZR1 times are just estimated. I'd be willing to wager we'll see 11.5 or better at 130+ mph.
Gripenfelter is offline  
Old 01-03-2008, 09:32 AM
  #26  
Registered User
 
GTOJack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: SE MI
Posts: 976
And? I was answering Zigrolds question as to how the Viper gained 100 horsepower without gaining any weight. It was done without the addition of supercharger and intercooler, which saves 100 pounds.
GTOJack is offline  
Old 01-03-2008, 09:43 AM
  #27  
Registered User
 
96_Camaro_B4C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 3,650
Originally Posted by GTOJack
And? I was answering Zigrolds question as to how the Viper gained 100 horsepower without gaining any weight. It was done without the addition of supercharger and intercooler, which saves 100 pounds.


I see it, now. His post was a few posts above yours, and there was no quotage, so I didn't make the connection.



96_Camaro_B4C is offline  
Old 01-03-2008, 11:11 AM
  #28  
Registered User
 
graham's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: northeast Miss.
Posts: 2,887
Stalemate?

And then a car rag will get one and run 11.2-11.4, then someone will but one and get some slicks and click off a mid-10. The MPH is there....
graham is offline  
Old 01-03-2008, 12:08 PM
  #29  
Registered User
 
Zigroid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Stroudsburg, PA
Posts: 948
Originally Posted by GTOJack
The Vipers additional horsepower comes naturally, without forced induction. Bigger bore, better heads and some things I forgot.
Originally Posted by GTOJack
And? I was answering Zigrolds question as to how the Viper gained 100 horsepower without gaining any weight. It was done without the addition of supercharger and intercooler, which saves 100 pounds.
Thats exactly my point. they gained hp without adding a supercharger and all that. did they have to make changes to the structure to handle the power? No. If a car gains power all motor there is rarely any extra weight added. I'm hoping for a camaro with 450-500 hp all motor. It shouldn't weigh any more than a 325 hp base model unless its optioned out with doodads. Did an LS1 car have more beef in it than an LT1 car? Did an 05 goat weigh more than an 04 goat?
Originally Posted by rlchv70
1. I bet that the 2004 Cobra was underrated and closer to 500hp.
03/04 cobras dyno at about 360-370 rwhp. A GT500 is at about 440 rwhp. Theres a 70-80 hp difference, not 110. Most people figured the cobras to be making around 420 flywheel horsepower.
Zigroid is offline  
Old 01-03-2008, 12:20 PM
  #30  
Registered User
 
Eric Bryant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Michigan's left coast
Posts: 2,405
Originally Posted by Zigroid
No. If a car gains power all motor there is rarely any extra weight added.
In this case, the Viper gained 100 HP without more weight because it was already overbuilt to begin with. If a car is already engineered properly, increasing the power by 20% should cause it to pork up a bit.

Not having to bolt on a blower and IC also helped quite a bit, but in this case, Dodge was sitting on a whole lot of displacement that wasn't being used in an efficient manner. GM didn't have the same "luxury" with the GenIV.

At any rate, this is starting to look like the superbike horsepower wars. Sure, the ZR1 is likely capable of beating any other production car on any given race circuit, but is it likely in the hands of an average (or even very good) driver? Nope. I can already see the frustration on the faces of ZR1 owners as some dude in a Miata with sticky DOT tires passes them mid-turn and walks away Hey, don't feel bad - I've been there myself on sportbikes, getting lapped by Ninja 500s with one-third the power.
Eric Bryant is offline  


Quick Reply: ZR1 Corvette... horsepower stalemate.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:17 PM.