Forced Induction Supercharger/Turbocharger

My Ported Victor Jr vs. Ported LT1 Manifold results.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-20-2009, 12:02 PM
  #31  
Registered User
 
97s10ondubs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Davie, FL
Posts: 1,109
Originally Posted by RealQuick
I couldn't find the efi version either, just the carb'd version

http://www.summitracing.com/parts/EDL-2975/
I think that's the one he has it was converted over to use a fuel rail and the sheetmetal elbow made to use a TB instead of the carb. i know some N/A guys did that.
97s10ondubs is offline  
Old 11-20-2009, 12:24 PM
  #32  
Registered User
 
DirtyDaveW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Upstate New York,USA
Posts: 1,791
on manifolds such as this (Vortec or SBC in original designation), are there modifications that must be made to the actual angle of the intake to head facing? Or is it merely the bolt holes/angle of bolt holes and covering up the distributor hole? BTW, rather than cover that up, I'd be tempted to just put a cut off distributor in there so I could more easily replace the cam/pump drive gear w/o having to pull the intake off.
DirtyDaveW is offline  
Old 11-20-2009, 02:09 PM
  #33  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
roguedriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Albuquerque, NM.
Posts: 1,194
I guess the "Jr." part could have been mis spoken. Its not a converted vic jr. manifold though. It is a Victor EFI with their fuel rail kit. I'll get the number off the manifold when i get home to be sure. It's definitly not a super vic.

Ken
roguedriver is offline  
Old 11-20-2009, 04:40 PM
  #34  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
roguedriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Albuquerque, NM.
Posts: 1,194
Ok. Department of corrections.... So the manifold is a Victor EFI. Part number 29785, not a Victor jr EFI. In escessence though, it's basically a vic jr. The super victor is a bit of a different animal as it is said to run in even the higher rpm range. I'd like to see a before and after with a super vic myself. Wondering if you'd see the same or more of an increase but starting at a higher rpm range. Hope that clears up any confusion. Sorry...

Ken R.
roguedriver is offline  
Old 11-20-2009, 05:20 PM
  #35  
Registered User
 
jakesz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Camanche IA
Posts: 393
Thats a good test. The thing to remember is this is a 6 speed car and most of you are running a auto with a stall. So any torque power loss below your stall speed would never be noticed. If he was running a 3600 to 4000 stall, which is very streetable in a overdrive lock up tranny you would not see any loss on a chassis dyno.
jakesz28 is offline  
Old 11-20-2009, 08:58 PM
  #36  
Registered User
 
reamo04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Kansas
Posts: 3,706
nice thing about me having an LS motor now, they make one already for it! lol
reamo04 is offline  
Old 11-20-2009, 11:32 PM
  #37  
Registered User
 
jetjoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 30
Originally Posted by roguedriver
Ok. Department of corrections.... So the manifold is a Victor EFI. Part number 29785, not a Victor jr EFI. In escessence though, it's basically a vic jr. The super victor is a bit of a different animal as it is said to run in even the higher rpm range. I'd like to see a before and after with a super vic myself. Wondering if you'd see the same or more of an increase but starting at a higher rpm range. Hope that clears up any confusion. Sorry...

Ken R.
Thanks for the clarification. Any chance you can detail exactly what you did to get it to bolt up?
jetjoe is offline  
Old 11-21-2009, 12:30 AM
  #38  
Registered User
 
reamo04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Kansas
Posts: 3,706
Originally Posted by jetjoe
Thanks for the clarification. Any chance you can detail exactly what you did to get it to bolt up?
you have to match the holes up, block the distributor hole, and get rid of the thermostat part

now, theres several ways to do these

distrubutor hole
a) weld it shut and have it smoothed out
b) put a freeze plug in it

bolt holes
a) weld up the old lt1 heads for the bolt holes and have them drilled/tapped for the SBC/vortec bolt holes -best idea so you can use any old school intake
b) weld up the current holes on the single plane, and drill for the lt1 holes, works ok, just atke the lt1 intake, hold it so everything is lined up with the single plane and clamp them together, drill the holes using the lt1 as a base.

thermostat coolant part
a) cap off the thermostat hole
b) machine it off

hope this helps some people out
reamo04 is offline  
Old 11-22-2009, 08:34 AM
  #39  
Registered User
 
4SFEDZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: A-town, TX
Posts: 666
this is interesting, you lost alot down low tho. i wounder how this would affect launching off a tbrake around 3500-4k?
4SFEDZ is offline  
Old 11-22-2009, 11:51 AM
  #40  
Registered User
 
jrutland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Ocean Springs, MS
Posts: 524
Hey Rogue,

Can you tell a difference on the street in everyday driving?

Thanks,

Jerry
jrutland is offline  
Old 11-22-2009, 11:57 AM
  #41  
Registered User
 
jakesz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Camanche IA
Posts: 393
Originally Posted by 4SFEDZ
this is interesting, you lost alot down low tho. i wounder how this would affect launching off a tbrake around 3500-4k?

You wouldn't notice any thing leaving on the transbrake.
jakesz28 is offline  
Old 11-22-2009, 02:50 PM
  #42  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
roguedriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Albuquerque, NM.
Posts: 1,194
You'd never notice it on the launch if your launching above 3500rpm anyway. I launch at around 4500. As far as on the street, the fact that it's a little down on power there is almost a plus if your getting on it. Why have a bunch of power there when your only gonna be in that range only from the get go. Give it a chance to hook. I shred the tires anyway, so it doesn't matter. Normally drivability is fine. The only reason power is down there though is because i have it tuned richer in those lower rpm's vs my old setup and also have a lot of timing pulled down low. If i ran the tune where it was in the lower rpms, it would probably be about matched up power wise below 4000rpm, maybe even a bit higher now.

Ken R.
roguedriver is offline  
Old 11-22-2009, 03:07 PM
  #43  
Registered User
 
firetird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: austin
Posts: 378
Awesome post! Too bad I never got to use the intake
firetird is offline  
Old 12-04-2009, 12:21 PM
  #44  
Registered User
 
bkrepindy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Indy, IN. USA
Posts: 153
Where is the MAP sensor mounted?
bkrepindy is offline  
Old 12-04-2009, 01:56 PM
  #45  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
roguedriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Albuquerque, NM.
Posts: 1,194
Originally Posted by bkrepindy
Where is the MAP sensor mounted?
I mounted it to the bottom side of the fuel rail on the passenger side and connected it to a vac port on the elbow.

Ken R.
roguedriver is offline  


Quick Reply: My Ported Victor Jr vs. Ported LT1 Manifold results.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:30 AM.