My Ported Victor Jr vs. Ported LT1 Manifold results.
#31
I couldn't find the efi version either, just the carb'd version
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/EDL-2975/
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/EDL-2975/
#32
on manifolds such as this (Vortec or SBC in original designation), are there modifications that must be made to the actual angle of the intake to head facing? Or is it merely the bolt holes/angle of bolt holes and covering up the distributor hole? BTW, rather than cover that up, I'd be tempted to just put a cut off distributor in there so I could more easily replace the cam/pump drive gear w/o having to pull the intake off.
#33
I guess the "Jr." part could have been mis spoken. Its not a converted vic jr. manifold though. It is a Victor EFI with their fuel rail kit. I'll get the number off the manifold when i get home to be sure. It's definitly not a super vic.
Ken
Ken
#34
Ok. Department of corrections.... So the manifold is a Victor EFI. Part number 29785, not a Victor jr EFI. In escessence though, it's basically a vic jr. The super victor is a bit of a different animal as it is said to run in even the higher rpm range. I'd like to see a before and after with a super vic myself. Wondering if you'd see the same or more of an increase but starting at a higher rpm range. Hope that clears up any confusion. Sorry...
Ken R.
Ken R.
#35
Thats a good test. The thing to remember is this is a 6 speed car and most of you are running a auto with a stall. So any torque power loss below your stall speed would never be noticed. If he was running a 3600 to 4000 stall, which is very streetable in a overdrive lock up tranny you would not see any loss on a chassis dyno.
#37
Ok. Department of corrections.... So the manifold is a Victor EFI. Part number 29785, not a Victor jr EFI. In escessence though, it's basically a vic jr. The super victor is a bit of a different animal as it is said to run in even the higher rpm range. I'd like to see a before and after with a super vic myself. Wondering if you'd see the same or more of an increase but starting at a higher rpm range. Hope that clears up any confusion. Sorry...
Ken R.
Ken R.
#38
now, theres several ways to do these
distrubutor hole
a) weld it shut and have it smoothed out
b) put a freeze plug in it
bolt holes
a) weld up the old lt1 heads for the bolt holes and have them drilled/tapped for the SBC/vortec bolt holes -best idea so you can use any old school intake
b) weld up the current holes on the single plane, and drill for the lt1 holes, works ok, just atke the lt1 intake, hold it so everything is lined up with the single plane and clamp them together, drill the holes using the lt1 as a base.
thermostat coolant part
a) cap off the thermostat hole
b) machine it off
hope this helps some people out
#41
#42
You'd never notice it on the launch if your launching above 3500rpm anyway. I launch at around 4500. As far as on the street, the fact that it's a little down on power there is almost a plus if your getting on it. Why have a bunch of power there when your only gonna be in that range only from the get go. Give it a chance to hook. I shred the tires anyway, so it doesn't matter. Normally drivability is fine. The only reason power is down there though is because i have it tuned richer in those lower rpm's vs my old setup and also have a lot of timing pulled down low. If i ran the tune where it was in the lower rpms, it would probably be about matched up power wise below 4000rpm, maybe even a bit higher now.
Ken R.
Ken R.
#45