General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech For general F-Body discussion that does not fit in any other forum.
For F-Body Technical/Information Discussion ONLY

Engine Airflow

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-04-2007 | 12:54 PM
  #1  
ulakovic22's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,872
From: Lantana, TX
Engine Airflow

Hey guys, need a quick hand to calculate an engines airfolw requirements. Basically am trying to decide how big a TB I need for my BBC project.
Old 04-04-2007 | 01:36 PM
  #2  
LiENUS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 747
From: Baton Rouge, LA
Originally Posted by ulakovic22
Hey guys, need a quick hand to calculate an engines airfolw requirements. Basically am trying to decide how big a TB I need for my BBC project.
Enginecalc (http://www.breakherthewang.com/enginecalc) can calculate an engines airflow requirements assuming 100% VE at a given rpm. So you can punch in the engines bore stroke and cylinder number then punch in say 8000 for the rpm (assuming you want to shift at 8000 rpm) and it will tell you how much air you would need at 8000 rpm I believe it defaults to 1.5 inches of mercury.
Old 04-04-2007 | 01:48 PM
  #3  
ulakovic22's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,872
From: Lantana, TX
Wow, that's a pretty cool program. I can't download it because I'm at work but I will look into it when I get home. If you have the time the information is:

bore: 4.56
stroke: 4.25
cylinders: 8
rpm: 7000 approx.
Old 04-04-2007 | 04:08 PM
  #4  
LiENUS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 747
From: Baton Rouge, LA
Originally Posted by ulakovic22
Wow, that's a pretty cool program. I can't download it because I'm at work but I will look into it when I get home. If you have the time the information is:

bore: 4.56
stroke: 4.25
cylinders: 8
rpm: 7000 approx.

1377.43 CFM @1.5 In. H.G.
You probably want to go at least 20% higher (1652.916) than this number due to variances in the way the calculation works and because the goal of a high power engine is to exceed 100% VE (Though this will happen at your torque peak, not your HP peak).
Old 04-04-2007 | 04:26 PM
  #5  
ulakovic22's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,872
From: Lantana, TX
Thanks a ton, that basically tells me that I can't use a 58mm Monoblade and now I need to find out what a LSx style 90mm TB flows. Thanks again!

Edit: Just checked TPIS 90mm TB's and they flow 1500 cfm. Next question I guess would be with that CFM requirement I'm assuming the intake and heads are a restriction and I would never need that much CFM's? And that would only be at WOT at 7K it would obviously be less at lower RPM's.

Last edited by ulakovic22; 04-04-2007 at 04:31 PM.
Old 04-04-2007 | 05:35 PM
  #6  
rskrause's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 10,745
From: Buffalo, New York
Use a big one. Unlike a carb, there is no issue with going too big. I am using a 2,000cfm TB on my BBC. The motor is 470ci and turns 7,000rpm, so it's far bigger than "needed" and there are no issues associated with it.

Rich
Old 04-04-2007 | 10:04 PM
  #7  
ulakovic22's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,872
From: Lantana, TX
I thought if I went too big then I might run into tip in issues that the LT1 guys were running into when doing a single plane conversion.

Are you running a 4bbl setup on yours or an elbow and monoblade set up? If a 4bbl then what did you do for a cold air setup? Right now I am going to use an elbow and route it to the stock WS6 ram air intake.
Old 04-05-2007 | 12:00 AM
  #8  
rskrause's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 10,745
From: Buffalo, New York
Originally Posted by ulakovic22
I thought if I went too big then I might run into tip in issues that the LT1 guys were running into when doing a single plane conversion.

Are you running a 4bbl setup on yours or an elbow and monoblade set up? If a 4bbl then what did you do for a cold air setup? Right now I am going to use an elbow and route it to the stock WS6 ram air intake.

It's a 4bbl type with a progressive linkage - no problems with throttle response. Not in a 4th gen., it's in my race car.

rich
Old 04-06-2007 | 08:23 AM
  #9  
ulakovic22's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,872
From: Lantana, TX
Thanks guys, I came across a decent deal on a new Comtech TB that I went ahead and picked up. Hopefully everything will work out.

On a side note though is what I said about the intake being a restriction true? You can get a 2,000 cfm TB, but if your intake can't flow that does it matter?
Old 04-06-2007 | 08:44 AM
  #10  
rskrause's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 10,745
From: Buffalo, New York
Well, the gains get incrementally smaller as the as the TB gets larger. Remember, the "standard" for carb flow is at 1.5" of vacuum. That's because less than that and the carb won't meter right. But that doens't mean there won't be more hp if the flow is greater. Just that with a carb, it might not work right. The intake side is just like exhaust systems - the more flow the better. The traditional carb rating scheme gives a size that leaves maybe a percent or so of peak power on the table. The implication is that using as big as TB as practical is the right way to go.

Rich
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DirtyDaveW
Forced Induction
13
12-01-2016 05:37 PM
willismoons
Parts For Sale
14
02-14-2015 08:42 PM
STR FTR 1
3rd Gen / L98 Engine Tech
5
02-10-2015 10:36 PM
Caps94ZODG
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
22
07-30-2002 08:45 AM



Quick Reply: Engine Airflow



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:37 PM.