General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech For general F-Body discussion that does not fit in any other forum.
For F-Body Technical/Information Discussion ONLY

What would be faster?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-11-2004 | 06:41 PM
  #16  
JoeliusZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,926
From: Detroit
Re: What would be faster?

an M6 would almost never win on the launch against that, but even if it doesnt get the launch, there is always a chance of the six speed catching back up (assuming a the guy knows how to shift)
Old 10-11-2004 | 07:55 PM
  #17  
Bad AZz Z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 469
From: Buffalo NY
Re: What would be faster?

Its not really that big of a stall and the tire is the same, so I dont think it is so difficult. I've beat that combo out of the hole before. But yes for most drivers ive seen, it is a rarity to match it consistantly. Many often do catch right back up though, bc once the launch and tq multiplication are over, the drivetrain losses mount for the rest of the run.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
David Dempsey
New Member Introduction
5
03-12-2016 12:42 AM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
09-14-2015 02:02 AM
CARiD
Supporting Vendor Group Purchases and Sales
0
09-07-2015 08:21 AM
browenb
Parts Wanted
2
07-20-2015 07:34 AM
Dark Zeiro
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
4
07-19-2015 08:25 AM



Quick Reply: What would be faster?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:19 PM.