Dyno'd my 2001 SS today for the first time...
#5
Good numbers!
I have a question though.. I have always heard that A4's lose about 20% due to drivetrain. Is that true? Because if it is then his car would have to actually have like 380hp to get 305 to the wheels. I am assuming that the 20% loss is an exaggerated number because I can imagine a stock SS making 380. I know they claim our cars are under rated, but I didnt think by that much.
I have a question though.. I have always heard that A4's lose about 20% due to drivetrain. Is that true? Because if it is then his car would have to actually have like 380hp to get 305 to the wheels. I am assuming that the 20% loss is an exaggerated number because I can imagine a stock SS making 380. I know they claim our cars are under rated, but I didnt think by that much.
#7
dyno numbers
Almost all the bone stock 2001 LS1 motors I've seen easily make roughly 290-310rwhp. Which is like 380-390 horsepower at the crank. All these LS1 motors are way under-rated, most people just don't know there dyno numbers.
#8
Re: dyno numbers
Originally posted by 383 N20 TA
Almost all the bone stock 2001 LS1 motors I've seen easily make roughly 290-310rwhp. Which is like 380-390 horsepower at the crank. All these LS1 motors are way under-rated, most people just don't know there dyno numbers.
Almost all the bone stock 2001 LS1 motors I've seen easily make roughly 290-310rwhp. Which is like 380-390 horsepower at the crank. All these LS1 motors are way under-rated, most people just don't know there dyno numbers.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Noct
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
2
07-14-2015 01:18 AM
CARiD
2010 - 2015 Camaro Interior, Exterior, Paint & Body, Electronics/Car Audio
0
07-07-2015 08:19 AM