LS1 Based Engine Tech LS1 / LS6 / LS2 / LS3 / LS7 Engine Tech

guys with 99 to 00 Ls1 camaros and trans am what are u running stock in the 1/4 mile?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-27-2004 | 01:10 PM
  #16  
CrippleFightin's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 923
From: Plainfield IL
Originally posted by speedy0009
time in the sig also. dead stock 13.21 with 2.18 06'
How did you only 24 rwhp and 16 rwtq with the addition of long tubes, gmmg exhaust and a lid? Im not tryin to bash you or anything but that seems low to me. Anyone else agree or am I just crazy?
Old 02-27-2004 | 04:40 PM
  #17  
cadjock's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 81
Stock as stock can be:
Old 02-27-2004 | 04:40 PM
  #18  
cadjock's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 81
Stock as stock can be:
Old 02-28-2004 | 05:46 AM
  #19  
CAJUN-Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 173
From: from the land of Justin Wilson and Huey Long!
Originally posted by DanBUCF
Check out this time slip...
http://www.mustangmods.com/data/5431/dsc01697.jpg...-Dan
Looking at reaction time, I had to laugh a bit since it's your dad and he's a bit slower than you. I often went out with my son and raced...I was a bit slower reaction-wise. Man, if you could improve your short time a bit, you woud be turning some nice times. Ever thought about ET Drags?...
Old 02-28-2004 | 06:04 PM
  #20  
LeadSled1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 182
From: Earleville, MD
My 99 Z28 A4 13.80 @ 100.80. I had one of the slowest ones around.

Now last night I ran my stock 01 WS6 for the first time: 2.3 60' 13.41 @ 109.48 mph. No track prep since it was street night. Some of the earlier cars run just as strong. They are all different and I definately suggest test driving one before you buy it. Some are just dogs in LS1 terms and some are animals like the one I have now.


JMHO,
Jess
Old 02-28-2004 | 10:54 PM
  #21  
speedy0009's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 183
From: Dartmouth, MA
Originally posted by transam41282
How did you only 24 rwhp and 16 rwtq with the addition of long tubes, gmmg exhaust and a lid? Im not tryin to bash you or anything but that seems low to me. Anyone else agree or am I just crazy?

The 24 rwhp and 16 rwtq were gained with only the addition of GMMG and lid. The FLP LTs were added later and I have not yet dynoed with them. Sorry for the confusion, but i figured i would leave my highest dyno #'s thus far.
Old 02-28-2004 | 11:30 PM
  #22  
DanBUCF's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 659
From: Orlando, Florida
Originally posted by CAJUN-Z
Looking at reaction time, I had to laugh a bit since it's your dad and he's a bit slower than you. I often went out with my son and raced...I was a bit slower reaction-wise. Man, if you could improve your short time a bit, you woud be turning some nice times. Ever thought about ET Drags?...
I would be too afraid to use ET drags on a regular basis with my stock 10 bolt. The 1.88 60' was on nitto drag radials. I think thats a pretty good 60' time for a stock suspension M6 car....of course I would like to improve on it, but I just don't see too much improvment unless I am at either at a stickier track or do some more mods. (Waiting on tax returns )

I'm dead positive the car has a 12.5 in it, possibly even a 12.4 but we shall see. Those would be pretty impressive numbers for a car with completely stock internals, stock gears, no headers, factory cats, stock suspension, no weight reduction, etc...just a set of drag radials, a little intake/exhaust work, and a stronger replacment clutch.
Old 02-29-2004 | 11:57 AM
  #23  
mrr23's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,151
From: orlando,florida,usa
http://www.stealthram.com/99formulamods.html

auto 3.23
stock 13.560 @ 103
added borla 13.17 @ 105.73
dyno also on that page.

Last edited by mrr23; 02-29-2004 at 12:00 PM.
Old 02-29-2004 | 06:50 PM
  #24  
99snkklr's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 141
From: Mentor, Ohio
My Ws6 with mods of: cutout, hood baffles removed, K & N filter, and PSEC stage 3 carbon clutch, ran 13.1.
Old 03-01-2004 | 12:47 AM
  #25  
Zerocool's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 139
From: martinez, CA
i just bought a 2000 SS m6 hardtop what should it run with 27k miles on the clock?? im a good driver or id like to think.. so what u guys think it can do?
Old 03-01-2004 | 12:54 AM
  #26  
Knowklew's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 897
From: Bartlett, IL
time and mods in sig
Old 03-01-2004 | 02:17 PM
  #27  
95z28ss's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 127
From: old bridge nj
my 2000 z28 m6 with a noticably slipping stock clutch and worn tires went 13.51 @ 107 with just borla cat back and mti lid when i first bought it. thats at englishtown it 95 degree heat. in cooler whether with the same clutch and a flowmaster cat back the car went 13.43 @109
Old 03-01-2004 | 02:29 PM
  #28  
ULTIMTEORANGESS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 737
From: eatontown nj united states
why would you change out a borla for a flowmaster? i dont think you did yourself any good.
Old 03-01-2004 | 10:06 PM
  #29  
BirchMan98z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 969
From: St. Louis, MO
my car went 13.02 @ 106 stock with a 2.03 60'

1998 z28. Bone stock it ran 13.0
Old 03-01-2004 | 10:24 PM
  #30  
95z28ss's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 127
From: old bridge nj
i changed the borla to flowmaster , because unlike most people on this board i like the way the flowmaster sounds. plus the borla has exhaust tips on it that look like they belong on a '85 vette. i bought the car and it had a borla on it, i had one on my '95 and got tired of . as for performance the car actually picked up a tenth with the flowmaster.

the 13.4 run also had a 2.35 60' due to bald tires


Quick Reply: guys with 99 to 00 Ls1 camaros and trans am what are u running stock in the 1/4 mile?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:30 AM.