guys with 99 to 00 Ls1 camaros and trans am what are u running stock in the 1/4 mile?
#16
Originally posted by speedy0009
time in the sig also. dead stock 13.21 with 2.18 06'
time in the sig also. dead stock 13.21 with 2.18 06'
#19
Originally posted by DanBUCF
Check out this time slip...
http://www.mustangmods.com/data/5431/dsc01697.jpg...-Dan
Check out this time slip...
http://www.mustangmods.com/data/5431/dsc01697.jpg...-Dan
#20
My 99 Z28 A4 13.80 @ 100.80. I had one of the slowest ones around.
Now last night I ran my stock 01 WS6 for the first time: 2.3 60' 13.41 @ 109.48 mph. No track prep since it was street night. Some of the earlier cars run just as strong. They are all different and I definately suggest test driving one before you buy it. Some are just dogs in LS1 terms and some are animals like the one I have now.
JMHO,
Jess
Now last night I ran my stock 01 WS6 for the first time: 2.3 60' 13.41 @ 109.48 mph. No track prep since it was street night. Some of the earlier cars run just as strong. They are all different and I definately suggest test driving one before you buy it. Some are just dogs in LS1 terms and some are animals like the one I have now.
JMHO,
Jess
#21
Originally posted by transam41282
How did you only 24 rwhp and 16 rwtq with the addition of long tubes, gmmg exhaust and a lid? Im not tryin to bash you or anything but that seems low to me. Anyone else agree or am I just crazy?
How did you only 24 rwhp and 16 rwtq with the addition of long tubes, gmmg exhaust and a lid? Im not tryin to bash you or anything but that seems low to me. Anyone else agree or am I just crazy?
The 24 rwhp and 16 rwtq were gained with only the addition of GMMG and lid. The FLP LTs were added later and I have not yet dynoed with them. Sorry for the confusion, but i figured i would leave my highest dyno #'s thus far.
#22
Originally posted by CAJUN-Z
Looking at reaction time, I had to laugh a bit since it's your dad and he's a bit slower than you. I often went out with my son and raced...I was a bit slower reaction-wise. Man, if you could improve your short time a bit, you woud be turning some nice times. Ever thought about ET Drags?...
Looking at reaction time, I had to laugh a bit since it's your dad and he's a bit slower than you. I often went out with my son and raced...I was a bit slower reaction-wise. Man, if you could improve your short time a bit, you woud be turning some nice times. Ever thought about ET Drags?...
I'm dead positive the car has a 12.5 in it, possibly even a 12.4 but we shall see. Those would be pretty impressive numbers for a car with completely stock internals, stock gears, no headers, factory cats, stock suspension, no weight reduction, etc...just a set of drag radials, a little intake/exhaust work, and a stronger replacment clutch.
#23
http://www.stealthram.com/99formulamods.html
auto 3.23
stock 13.560 @ 103
added borla 13.17 @ 105.73
dyno also on that page.
auto 3.23
stock 13.560 @ 103
added borla 13.17 @ 105.73
dyno also on that page.
Last edited by mrr23; 02-29-2004 at 12:00 PM.
#27
my 2000 z28 m6 with a noticably slipping stock clutch and worn tires went 13.51 @ 107 with just borla cat back and mti lid when i first bought it. thats at englishtown it 95 degree heat. in cooler whether with the same clutch and a flowmaster cat back the car went 13.43 @109
#30
i changed the borla to flowmaster , because unlike most people on this board i like the way the flowmaster sounds. plus the borla has exhaust tips on it that look like they belong on a '85 vette. i bought the car and it had a borla on it, i had one on my '95 and got tired of . as for performance the car actually picked up a tenth with the flowmaster.
the 13.4 run also had a 2.35 60' due to bald tires
the 13.4 run also had a 2.35 60' due to bald tires