How to check PTV Clearance w/ Play Doh?
#1
How to check PTV Clearance w/ Play Doh?
I was going to ask this on LS1tech, but they've been a bunch of A-Holes lately in the internal room.
Ok, I'm assuming I'll need two sets of head bolts, or can I reuse the stockers that I removed just to check the PTV clearance?
I take it I can just take a thin layer of play-doh, about 1/4 thick, w/o the spark plugs, and spin the engine over by hand. Or should I pull the fuel and ignition fuses/solenoids and spin the engine over w/ the battery to pump the lifters up? -Not a good idea? Risking bent PR's?
THanx..
Ok, I'm assuming I'll need two sets of head bolts, or can I reuse the stockers that I removed just to check the PTV clearance?
I take it I can just take a thin layer of play-doh, about 1/4 thick, w/o the spark plugs, and spin the engine over by hand. Or should I pull the fuel and ignition fuses/solenoids and spin the engine over w/ the battery to pump the lifters up? -Not a good idea? Risking bent PR's?
THanx..
#2
NO DON'T USE PLAY-DOH! It is somewhat elastic and will not give you a true reading. Instead, use modeling clay.
You can reuse old head bolts for this, and you really only need a couple of bolts to do it. The head needs to be installed with the gasket and torqued down with a couple of the bolts. Torque of the head bolts isn't critical here, but it needs to be enough to crush the head gasket. Turn the engine over BY HAND! DO NOT USE THE STARTER! If there is any interference (not likely) turning the engine over with the starter will ruin your whole project.
The lifters will not be pumped up for this, so you'll either need a solid roller lifter with all the proper dimensions and matching pushrod, or you can modify a stock lifter by tack welding the lifter so it cannot collapse.
What is the setup you want to run?
You can reuse old head bolts for this, and you really only need a couple of bolts to do it. The head needs to be installed with the gasket and torqued down with a couple of the bolts. Torque of the head bolts isn't critical here, but it needs to be enough to crush the head gasket. Turn the engine over BY HAND! DO NOT USE THE STARTER! If there is any interference (not likely) turning the engine over with the starter will ruin your whole project.
The lifters will not be pumped up for this, so you'll either need a solid roller lifter with all the proper dimensions and matching pushrod, or you can modify a stock lifter by tack welding the lifter so it cannot collapse.
What is the setup you want to run?
#3
^ I'm going to be doing a TF heads and cam combo. I was going to keep the cam grind as hush hush as I could, but for the sake of PTV Clearance advice, I'll have to let it go.
The duration is MILD, but the lift is .639 at the most. I don't think PTV clearance should be an issue, but better safe than sorry.
I'll be using the cometic head gaskets too.. I think they're .040".
The duration is MILD, but the lift is .639 at the most. I don't think PTV clearance should be an issue, but better safe than sorry.
I'll be using the cometic head gaskets too.. I think they're .040".
#4
NO DON'T USE PLAY-DOH! It is somewhat elastic and will not give you a true reading. Instead, use modeling clay.
You can reuse old head bolts for this, and you really only need a couple of bolts to do it. The head needs to be installed with the gasket and torqued down with a couple of the bolts. Torque of the head bolts isn't critical here, but it needs to be enough to crush the head gasket. Turn the engine over BY HAND! DO NOT USE THE STARTER! If there is any interference (not likely) turning the engine over with the starter will ruin your whole project.
The lifters will not be pumped up for this, so you'll either need a solid roller lifter with all the proper dimensions and matching pushrod, or you can modify a stock lifter by tack welding the lifter so it cannot collapse.
What is the setup you want to run?
You can reuse old head bolts for this, and you really only need a couple of bolts to do it. The head needs to be installed with the gasket and torqued down with a couple of the bolts. Torque of the head bolts isn't critical here, but it needs to be enough to crush the head gasket. Turn the engine over BY HAND! DO NOT USE THE STARTER! If there is any interference (not likely) turning the engine over with the starter will ruin your whole project.
The lifters will not be pumped up for this, so you'll either need a solid roller lifter with all the proper dimensions and matching pushrod, or you can modify a stock lifter by tack welding the lifter so it cannot collapse.
What is the setup you want to run?
#5
^ I'm going to be doing a TF heads and cam combo. I was going to keep the cam grind as hush hush as I could, but for the sake of PTV Clearance advice, I'll have to let it go.
The duration is MILD, but the lift is .639 at the most. I don't think PTV clearance should be an issue, but better safe than sorry.
I'll be using the cometic head gaskets too.. I think they're .040".
The duration is MILD, but the lift is .639 at the most. I don't think PTV clearance should be an issue, but better safe than sorry.
I'll be using the cometic head gaskets too.. I think they're .040".
#6
^ I'm going to be doing a TF heads and cam combo. I was going to keep the cam grind as hush hush as I could, but for the sake of PTV Clearance advice, I'll have to let it go.
The duration is MILD, but the lift is .639 at the most. I don't think PTV clearance should be an issue, but better safe than sorry.
I'll be using the cometic head gaskets too.. I think they're .040".
The duration is MILD, but the lift is .639 at the most. I don't think PTV clearance should be an issue, but better safe than sorry.
I'll be using the cometic head gaskets too.. I think they're .040".
Are you opposed to flycutting the pistons?
Put it this way.... If the cam isn't advanced much and the duration is still somewhere in the low 230s and intake valves are 2.02 or less, then I don't think you'll have any problem as long as you install the stock head gasket instead of the Cometic. Using anything over a .610 cam in a heads/cam combo is a pretty bad idea IMO when you're using bigger than stock valves and a thinner than stock head gasket and using a +4 grind cam. The TRAK (is that what you're using?) is basically a max-effort street grind cam-only cam with I BELIEVE LSK lobes for intake and XER lobes for exhaust.
My old heads/cam setup had MINIMAL clearance (something like .065-.070" with .020" milled heads and 2.055 intake valves, however, the cam was only advanced 2 degrees and I was still using a stock head gasket.)
Let's put it into perspective - PtV clearance of my build VS your build. .... + = pros / - = cons
My build:
+ Lift .610
+ Cam advance +2
+ Head Gasket .051
- Milled Heads .020
- Intake Valves 2.055
Your build:
- Lift .639
Cam advance ?
- Head Gasket .040
Milled Heads ?
Intake Valves ?
Fill in the ? marks and maybe I can help you. PM me if you dont' want it to be made public.
Mike
#7
ok... I guess I have to let the cat out of the bag now.
224/228 .637 .639 110 LSA, 5* overlap, O advance.
64cc Chamber
2.04" intake valves
NOT milled
Cometic (I like these better.)
13* intake valve angle
You should be able to tell almost buy the lift. The only reason I see to get really in depth into someone's set up is if they're running the TReX, MS4 or TSP Texas Giant cam. OR milled heads.. I can see a problem w/ stage 2.5 heads and 245 duration, .639 lift and a 110lsa..
W/ MILD duration and no more than .639 lift on a 110 and 5* of overlap, I don't see a problem with it, I just thought I'd better make sure.
224/228 .637 .639 110 LSA, 5* overlap, O advance.
64cc Chamber
2.04" intake valves
NOT milled
Cometic (I like these better.)
13* intake valve angle
You should be able to tell almost buy the lift. The only reason I see to get really in depth into someone's set up is if they're running the TReX, MS4 or TSP Texas Giant cam. OR milled heads.. I can see a problem w/ stage 2.5 heads and 245 duration, .639 lift and a 110lsa..
W/ MILD duration and no more than .639 lift on a 110 and 5* of overlap, I don't see a problem with it, I just thought I'd better make sure.
Last edited by Bayer-Z28; 09-17-2007 at 08:15 PM.
#8
ok... I guess I have to let the cat out of the bag now.
224/228 .637 .639 110 LSA, 5* overlap, O advance.
64cc Chamber
2.04" intake valves
NOT milled
Cometic (I like these better.)
13* intake valve angle
You should be able to tell almost buy the lift. The only reason I see to get really in depth into someone's set up is if they're running the TReX, MS4 or TSP Texas Giant cam. OR milled heads.. I can see a problem w/ stage 2.5 heads and 245 duration, .639 lift and a 110lsa..
W/ MILD duration and no more than .639 lift on a 110 and 5* of overlap, I don't see a problem with it, I just thought I'd better make sure.
224/228 .637 .639 110 LSA, 5* overlap, O advance.
64cc Chamber
2.04" intake valves
NOT milled
Cometic (I like these better.)
13* intake valve angle
You should be able to tell almost buy the lift. The only reason I see to get really in depth into someone's set up is if they're running the TReX, MS4 or TSP Texas Giant cam. OR milled heads.. I can see a problem w/ stage 2.5 heads and 245 duration, .639 lift and a 110lsa..
W/ MILD duration and no more than .639 lift on a 110 and 5* of overlap, I don't see a problem with it, I just thought I'd better make sure.
#10
The lift makes up for it. It's at special order TQ'r cam.
I think too many people are over cam'ing the LS1's anyway. Sure your MS4 MAY make 500hp, but you have to tach the **** out of it.. W/ this cam you do not.
Who in the heck sells AFR 8019 springs anyway? I can't find them... Can I use them on TFS heads or is it just AFR specific??? What valves @ 2.04"?? The springs that come on TF ehads are only good to .600" lift.
Check it..
And maybe I should have read that thread I found the cam in a little more.
I think too many people are over cam'ing the LS1's anyway. Sure your MS4 MAY make 500hp, but you have to tach the **** out of it.. W/ this cam you do not.
Who in the heck sells AFR 8019 springs anyway? I can't find them... Can I use them on TFS heads or is it just AFR specific??? What valves @ 2.04"?? The springs that come on TF ehads are only good to .600" lift.
Check it..
Since I liked the street manners of the 114LSA cam, but I wanted lots more torque, I asked ********** to grind me up a Super Torquey cam that would have excellent street manners. Here's what they came up with:
224/228 .637/.639 110LSA (+0).
I'm absolutely in love with this cam. It feels like I picked up 50 lb ft of torque in the 2000-4000rpm range over the 234/238 114LSA cam.
Here's why: My dynamic compression has risen from 8.34:1 to 8:73:1! We even saw a huge increase in cranking compression. The 234/238 114LSA cam had 200psi and the new Torque cam has 245psi! Holy smokes!! No wonder my throttle response is instantaneous.
This cam proves that you can have a 110LSA cam and still have excellent street manners and the .637/.639" lift will really compliment my high flowing AFR 225 heads. I will spend this week tweaking my speed density tune, then I hope to go to Houston and put it on the rollers! Torque, Torque, Torque!!
224/228 .637/.639 110LSA (+0).
I'm absolutely in love with this cam. It feels like I picked up 50 lb ft of torque in the 2000-4000rpm range over the 234/238 114LSA cam.
Here's why: My dynamic compression has risen from 8.34:1 to 8:73:1! We even saw a huge increase in cranking compression. The 234/238 114LSA cam had 200psi and the new Torque cam has 245psi! Holy smokes!! No wonder my throttle response is instantaneous.
This cam proves that you can have a 110LSA cam and still have excellent street manners and the .637/.639" lift will really compliment my high flowing AFR 225 heads. I will spend this week tweaking my speed density tune, then I hope to go to Houston and put it on the rollers! Torque, Torque, Torque!!
You will not have to notch pistons to run this cam. It is only 224/228 in duration at .050". Lift matters little with piston to valve clearance because when the valve is at maximum lift, the piston is nearly at the bottom of the cylinder bore. It's when the piston is approaching or departing top dead center that you get P to V clearance issues. The longer you hang a valve open (duration), the more chance you have of getting into P to V issues. Repeat after me, duration is what gives piston to valve clearance issues, not lift.
As an example: a 248/258 .500/.500" lift cam would have piston to valve contact.
A 224/228 .750/.750" cam would not.
As an example: a 248/258 .500/.500" lift cam would have piston to valve contact.
A 224/228 .750/.750" cam would not.
Last edited by Bayer-Z28; 09-18-2007 at 07:06 PM.
#12
^ Cool. I just wanted to try to do something different. THe AFR springs have a NICE seat pressure.
I found the dyno results for the cam. DAMN NICE!! These were w/ AFR 225 heads. The XE-R Cam tested is 234/238 .598/.605 114LSA (+2). I'd really like to do the TF heads because prior tests have proved they flow as good as AFR 225 heads even w/ the 215 intake runner.
I think this cam should work w/ the 383ci. I'm not going to dish out $9000 for a new engine when I can just do a forged bottom end for a 383 cube, then boost it. I may have to switch cams by the time the turbo arrives, but that is about 2 years down the road.
Seat pressure specs.
I found the dyno results for the cam. DAMN NICE!! These were w/ AFR 225 heads. The XE-R Cam tested is 234/238 .598/.605 114LSA (+2). I'd really like to do the TF heads because prior tests have proved they flow as good as AFR 225 heads even w/ the 215 intake runner.
I think this cam should work w/ the 383ci. I'm not going to dish out $9000 for a new engine when I can just do a forged bottom end for a 383 cube, then boost it. I may have to switch cams by the time the turbo arrives, but that is about 2 years down the road.
Here's how the numbers compare between the cams (averaged):
.......TRak cam..XE-R cam..Torque Cam (rwhp/rwtq)
2500...130/290..128/270...150/320
3000...191/335..183/320...200/350
3500...247/370..233/350...247/370
4000...289/380..282/370...290/382
4500...343/400..338/395...345/402
4800...367/402..366/400...375/410
5000...383/402..381/400...387/406
5500...419/400..416/398...428/409
6000...455/398..453/397...452/396
6300...461/384..458/382...459/383
6500...461/372..458/370...459/371
7000...454/341..452/339...446/335
.......TRak cam..XE-R cam..Torque Cam (rwhp/rwtq)
2500...130/290..128/270...150/320
3000...191/335..183/320...200/350
3500...247/370..233/350...247/370
4000...289/380..282/370...290/382
4500...343/400..338/395...345/402
4800...367/402..366/400...375/410
5000...383/402..381/400...387/406
5500...419/400..416/398...428/409
6000...455/398..453/397...452/396
6300...461/384..458/382...459/383
6500...461/372..458/370...459/371
7000...454/341..452/339...446/335
My Comp 921s had 155 seat and 410 open pressure. My new AFR 8019 springs have 165 seat and 440 open pressure. There are two reason we like shimming the springs when using the LSK lobes.
1. You get more pressure and better valve control.
2. You eliminate a great deal of spring surge which will help the springs last a lot longer.
1. You get more pressure and better valve control.
2. You eliminate a great deal of spring surge which will help the springs last a lot longer.
Last edited by Bayer-Z28; 09-18-2007 at 08:31 PM.
#13
When I thought that those numbers aren't nearly as impressive as I thought they'd be, I saw that they were AFR 225s instead of Trickflows. I made better numbers than that with an F-15 236/239 .600/.611 112 +2 and Dart 225s @ 471/416 through a Vette IRS.
The Trickflows should make much more power.
I think you're spending too much time on that "other" board
Mike
The Trickflows should make much more power.
I think you're spending too much time on that "other" board
Mike
#15
^ Ah... thanx for that one.. I don't feel like buying two... THe vendor who designed the cam says I don't have anything to worry about w/ PTV clearance.. But that for the help for the next time I have to do it..