How do they get 345& 380HP out of the LS1?
#16
i'm not saying gm is lying. the under-rating issue is simply the dyno slide, but 18% may apply to one vehicle and not another. it's different for auto, stick, wheel and tire combo, rear differential, etc. when your talking these power numbers, percentage is important. 3% difference is around 10hp as an example which some people pay alot to pick up 10 hp, so yeah a few percent is a big deal...
#17
Originally posted by Y2kPewterSS
The numbers that GM reports for HP are numbers off an engine dyno, not a chassis dyno. They are not lying about these numbers for any of their vehicles or they would be opening themselves up for quite a lawsuit.
Brian
The numbers that GM reports for HP are numbers off an engine dyno, not a chassis dyno. They are not lying about these numbers for any of their vehicles or they would be opening themselves up for quite a lawsuit.
Brian
#19
I can't say anything for your claim about 315rwHP but I can say... What marketing value is there in underrating your engines? I don't know what the spread on HP output for LS1 engines is. I would imagine the published HP ratings are for the bottom of the spectrum though.
Brian
Brian
#21
It seems a little hard to believe that with a simple Lid and Catback you can see 380hp at the crank on an otherwise stock LS1.. If its true, its cool, but just seems odd.. I guess if the cars really make like 350 at the crank than it does seem right..
#22
that may be the bottom line, but a lid and a catback doesn't get you 5hp away from the 01' Z06. the bottom line is people are paying extra for the round about number because the sticker on the hood says so. anyone that was at the berger even can see the wonderfull numbers the gmmg cars put down.
#23
Let's see ... I laid down 330 RWHP (SAE Corrected) at Hypertech two weeks ago with only a lid and a cutout.
Assuming a 15% drivetrain loss in the 6-speed tranny, that works out to 388 HP at the flywheel. So, I'd say it's not too hard to get 380.
If you want to take the 13% drivetrain loss, then it works out to 379 HP at the flywheel. I still ain't complaining.
Assuming a 15% drivetrain loss in the 6-speed tranny, that works out to 388 HP at the flywheel. So, I'd say it's not too hard to get 380.
If you want to take the 13% drivetrain loss, then it works out to 379 HP at the flywheel. I still ain't complaining.
Last edited by rncotton; 05-05-2003 at 10:45 AM.
#25
Originally posted by rncotton
Let's see ... I laid down 330 RWHP (SAE Corrected) at Hypertech two weeks ago with only a lid and a cutout.
Assuming a 15% drivetrain loss in the 6-speed tranny, that works out to 388 HP at the flywheel. So, I'd say it's not too hard to get 380.
If you want to take the 13% drivetrain loss, then it works out to 379 HP at the flywheel. I still ain't complaining.
Let's see ... I laid down 330 RWHP (SAE Corrected) at Hypertech two weeks ago with only a lid and a cutout.
Assuming a 15% drivetrain loss in the 6-speed tranny, that works out to 388 HP at the flywheel. So, I'd say it's not too hard to get 380.
If you want to take the 13% drivetrain loss, then it works out to 379 HP at the flywheel. I still ain't complaining.
#26
Originally posted by Y2kPewterSS
The numbers that GM reports for HP are numbers off an engine dyno, not a chassis dyno. They are not lying about these numbers for any of their vehicles or they would be opening themselves up for quite a lawsuit.
Brian
The numbers that GM reports for HP are numbers off an engine dyno, not a chassis dyno. They are not lying about these numbers for any of their vehicles or they would be opening themselves up for quite a lawsuit.
Brian