LS1 Based Engine Tech LS1 / LS6 / LS2 / LS3 / LS7 Engine Tech

I heard 98's dyno lower...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-12-2004 | 07:25 AM
  #16  
gav'spurplez's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 350
From: Chicago
it is true that an auto will dyno 10-15 less than a manual and they tested a manual in my magazine

i have an auto with 273's
Old 06-12-2004 | 05:11 PM
  #17  
zoomjrl's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 340
From: Oklahoma City
yeah sorry if if that was confusing. all m6s have 3.42s
Old 06-12-2004 | 05:19 PM
  #18  
Killaz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 362
From: Portland, OR
I hit 300rwhp in my 98 and i have an auto so.......
Old 06-12-2004 | 06:50 PM
  #19  
SSpdDmon's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,747
From: Farmington, MI
Stock '98 with ~80K+ miles on the clock put down 300hp to the wheels on Horsepower TV today.
Old 06-12-2004 | 07:24 PM
  #20  
zoomjrl's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 340
From: Oklahoma City
i thought 98s had bigger injectors
Old 06-13-2004 | 06:04 PM
  #21  
BirchMan98z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 969
From: St. Louis, MO
I have a 98 and it put down (316.2 rwhp) and (326.7 rwtq) with just a K&N filter.
Old 06-14-2004 | 12:06 AM
  #22  
AL SS590 M6's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 1998
Posts: 6,249
From: Charlotte,MI USA
Originally posted by BirchMan98z
I have a 98 and it put down (316.2 rwhp) and (326.7 rwtq) with just a K&N filter.
What did it MPH in the 1/4????
Old 06-14-2004 | 12:13 AM
  #23  
gav'spurplez's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 350
From: Chicago
damn there are some serious numbers being posted

nice
Old 06-14-2004 | 02:06 AM
  #24  
BirchMan98z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 969
From: St. Louis, MO
Originally posted by AL SS590 M6
What did it MPH in the 1/4????
well, by the time I actually had it to the track I had exhaust on it... just a catback but hey, it all adds up. It was good for 13.42 @ 105.7 Which was coincidentally the first time I had ever BEEN to the track.

2nd run was 13.23 @ 105.5

and 3rd run of the day I went 13.09 @ 105.8

I eventually got it down to a 12.88 @ 106.6 with just a K&N and cat-back.
Old 06-14-2004 | 08:55 AM
  #25  
gav'spurplez's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 350
From: Chicago
damn 12.8 with a filter and catback. man i ran 13.6 with those mods

awesome times, got to dyno my car
Old 06-14-2004 | 10:20 AM
  #26  
trackbird's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 519
From: Columbus, OH
My 2002 M6 dynoed 299.7 hp/317.5 ft lbs with a SLP lid and a K&N (the K&N is worth less than 1 hp from what I've seen). That is the lowest I've ever seen a 2002 M6 dyno. It had 5,500 miles on it at the time. My only drag strip pass was not a good test (1.09 light, 2.6 60ft and nearly stalled it, launching at 900 rpm and a 14.04@102.5). I'm sure the car would go faster, but that was on a 90 degree day (before I'd mailed the first car payment on it) and I was going real easy on it.

Of course, by the 4th dyno pull, my hp was down into the mid 280 hp range. I suspect the car was not cooling properly on the dyno and that may have been part of the problem.
Old 06-14-2004 | 12:16 PM
  #27  
ratio411's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 511
From: Soon to be Pensacola
I have a 98 M6
I pulled 318/328 with a Dynomouth and lid (paper filter).
It was one pull, very hot day.

Concerning some previous comments:
Lower gears cause lower dynos. Not vice versa.
Autos dyno lower because of more parasitic loss, but tend to be faster at the track due to consisent shifting. M6 with traction has the edge, but only with a very good driver.
The 98 cam is better, the later cars got the truck cam to detune them a little. The exhaust, intake, and other revisions called for a smaller cam to keep power in check.
Later cars are said to dyno ~10 higher, this is what I have seen myself, but there are factory freaks both ways.
I have seen 2 dynos that were later cars with my exact same mods and they were exacty 10 rwhp higher.
Dave
Old 06-14-2004 | 01:39 PM
  #28  
falchulk's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,881
Originally posted by psychocabbage
Z06 clutch stock..
I dont think we have EGR at all..
Are you sure about this???
Old 06-14-2004 | 04:05 PM
  #29  
LeadSled1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 182
From: Earleville, MD
my 99 dynoed 279 rwhp and 281 rwhp on the same session. Best mph was 101. My 01 has not been dynoed but trapped 109.46 mph on its only run down the track. 99 was an auto and the 01 is a manual.
Old 06-14-2004 | 07:54 PM
  #30  
trackbird's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 519
From: Columbus, OH
Originally posted by falchulk
Are you sure about this???
I know the '02's have the Z06 clutch (not sure on the 01's) and there is no egr on my 2002 and I bought it new from the dealer and did not remove it myself. I'm very sure about both of those.


Quick Reply: I heard 98's dyno lower...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:23 PM.