Which LS1
#16
Originally posted by JaysZ
I'm sorry about continuing to beat this horse but it drives me crazy not knowing what GM's mindset is here.
Why put in a smaller cam? Maybe a fuel economy issue? But then you lose horsepower so you throw a better intake on it to get back some HP. So you use the LS6 intake and at the same time you get to dump the EGR.
Or was the goal to eliminate the EGR and then everything else fell into place as a result. I can't believe they made these changes just to bump the LS1 to 310. The extra 5hp must have been just a by-product?
I'll bet one of you smart guys out there knows (or can find) the answer.
I'm sorry about continuing to beat this horse but it drives me crazy not knowing what GM's mindset is here.
Why put in a smaller cam? Maybe a fuel economy issue? But then you lose horsepower so you throw a better intake on it to get back some HP. So you use the LS6 intake and at the same time you get to dump the EGR.
Or was the goal to eliminate the EGR and then everything else fell into place as a result. I can't believe they made these changes just to bump the LS1 to 310. The extra 5hp must have been just a by-product?
I'll bet one of you smart guys out there knows (or can find) the answer.
#17
Originally posted by Z-Attitude
The EGR valve was also eleminated in the '01-'02, had to do with the cam change. A plus IMO. Later>>>>>>
The EGR valve was also eleminated in the '01-'02, had to do with the cam change. A plus IMO. Later>>>>>>
#18
How about that lean condition that seemed to be more present in the later LS1s than in '98-'00??? Everytime someone lifted airflow restrictions....they jumped right on the site with SES codes???? Yeah, there were/are several differences between the two versions...personally I think I'd have changed to the '01-'02 version if I wasn't stickin where I am. There's no "better" between the two if you're gonna bump the perf. from what I've observed the last coupla' years. But it would seem there's more fun workin' on the later version without some of the extra plumbing!!! 2 cents
#19
1998s have larger 28/lb injectors vs. 99-2000s 26/lbs. I'm not sure on the injectors for 2001-2, but I think that they returned to a slightly larger size. 2000+ got cast exhaust manifolds replacing the tubular ones. 2001+ got the LS6 intake and 5.3 truck cam. This eliminated the need for an EGR system. 1998s have individually mounted coil packs vs. the rail set-up on later models. 1998s also have a heavier metal gas tank vs. the newer plastic ones. If I had to do it over again, I would have waited until 2001, but I've upgraded most of the stuff on my 2000 Z28 anyway. Good luck!
#20
I have driven most of the configerations in 3rd and 4th gens in stock form. The performance difference from '98 to '02 could be production verance(sp). A strong '98 will beat a slow '02. The SS is cool but not $4000 to $5000 faster. Yes, I still want one.
Had a '94 M6 stock except for CAI, fast as hell. (Sold to friend has 120K still fast as hell) LS1's with autos slow or no better than a LT1. M6 LS1's are fun
Get something in good shape in stead of a year. Save a few $$$$ for fun parts and enjoy.
Had a '94 M6 stock except for CAI, fast as hell. (Sold to friend has 120K still fast as hell) LS1's with autos slow or no better than a LT1. M6 LS1's are fun
Get something in good shape in stead of a year. Save a few $$$$ for fun parts and enjoy.
#24
To take this post another direction... regarding the 6 speeds. I have heard a lot of discussion about T56 problems on LS1's, are there certain years that were worse than others? I can't remember exactly what the problem was, something about popping out of gear, or not going into gear, or something along those lines.
#27
fastest car in high school..... can u say that u had the fastest car in high schoo lot when u were a sophmore.....i dont think so
BUT I CAN.....HEHE and it aint auto either
now im a junior and stik6shift00 is close but with my experience and no nx probs ill beat him.......
back to topic.......... 98 have biggext injectors and are cheapest since their the oldest......01 and 02 ls6 intake 02 bigger injectors....if u wanna spend $$$$$ get 02 if u wanna spend lil cash get 98 and get ls6 intake for 450 and you should be the same as 02.....close as hell anyway
or get nx and smoke em all
BUT I CAN.....HEHE and it aint auto either
now im a junior and stik6shift00 is close but with my experience and no nx probs ill beat him.......
back to topic.......... 98 have biggext injectors and are cheapest since their the oldest......01 and 02 ls6 intake 02 bigger injectors....if u wanna spend $$$$$ get 02 if u wanna spend lil cash get 98 and get ls6 intake for 450 and you should be the same as 02.....close as hell anyway
or get nx and smoke em all
#29
Originally posted by mtimney
To take this post another direction... regarding the 6 speeds. I have heard a lot of discussion about T56 problems on LS1's, are there certain years that were worse than others? I can't remember exactly what the problem was, something about popping out of gear, or not going into gear, or something along those lines.
To take this post another direction... regarding the 6 speeds. I have heard a lot of discussion about T56 problems on LS1's, are there certain years that were worse than others? I can't remember exactly what the problem was, something about popping out of gear, or not going into gear, or something along those lines.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post