Supercharger, or Heads/Cam...
#31
Or get the 8.1L, 496 cubic inch engine that's going into the new trucks!! It's a big-block that's fashioned after the LS1 (ie: individual coil-packs per cylinder, and it's a full-roller motor too I believe)!!
When all else fails, go big or go home!
Seriously, build a good motor first, then worry about what separate power booster (supercharger/turbo/NOS) you want to add. If you build a motor right, you could have a fast naturally aspirated car --- then add your S/C, and the car will f'ing fly!!!
When all else fails, go big or go home!
Seriously, build a good motor first, then worry about what separate power booster (supercharger/turbo/NOS) you want to add. If you build a motor right, you could have a fast naturally aspirated car --- then add your S/C, and the car will f'ing fly!!!
#32
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by supersp0rt:
cam...800
</font>
cam...800
</font>
I would go with the supercharger first. mainly because I would want to lower compression with an SC, and I would rather do that after I have the SC instead of doing it N/A. also as was said a blower specific cam will work great will a blower, but only OK with H/C so I would rather have the blower on when sticking that in...
More than one person has put an SC on a stock head/cam/block car, so they seem to be able to take it, even then the problem isnt going to be the heads or cam failing, it will be the pistions/rods/crank probably in that order
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post