LS1 Based Engine Tech LS1 / LS6 / LS2 / LS3 / LS7 Engine Tech

Took your advice, and here are the results....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-30-2002 | 03:13 PM
  #16  
BlackHawk T/A's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 240
From: Lincoln, NE
You may be bashing cat-backs, but it depends...

Take the GMMG for example...it doesn't have mufflers, so it WILL outperform other systems that use mufflers. It's as close to running straight pipes as you can get aside from the Loudmouth.
Old 09-30-2002 | 04:53 PM
  #17  
ratio411's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 511
From: Soon to be Pensacola
Originally posted by BlackHawk T/A
You may be bashing cat-backs, but it depends...
Take the GMMG for example...it doesn't have mufflers, so it WILL outperform other systems that use mufflers. It's as close to running straight pipes as you can get aside from the Loudmouth.
Nope, the GMMG uses the old 60s style "chambered muffler", It is pipe that has been crimped over and over in an offset pattern. Sorry, but if you were to look through one of those, the crimps take away nearly half of the diameter of the pipe and causes extreme flow disruption. Not flaming the system, I know alot of folks like it, but don't go around saying the mufflers are something they are not.

96fbirdA4: True, but my point is that it is dyno proven that it doesn't matter on our cars until you go beyond certain mods that are far more involved than bolt-ons. Once you get to this point in your mods, you wouldn't want a .25" increase in pipe... you would be looking at duals or a 4" Mufflex. Don't you agree?
Dave
Old 09-30-2002 | 04:58 PM
  #18  
texanmutt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 266
From: TX
For a real bang for the buck mod, just get a cutout.
Old 09-30-2002 | 07:12 PM
  #19  
smallwood's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 113
From: dallas, ga
GMMG all the way. Chambered rumble rules.
Old 10-01-2002 | 06:16 AM
  #20  
96fbirdA4's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 221
From: Marysville, OH
Originally posted by ratio411
96fbirdA4: True, but my point is that it is dyno proven that it doesn't matter on our cars until you go beyond certain mods that are far more involved than bolt-ons. Once you get to this point in your mods, you wouldn't want a .25" increase in pipe... you would be looking at duals or a 4" Mufflex. Don't you agree?
Dave
I agree with you to some extent. If you were going to be putting together a stroker motor or big FI, then yes you'd be looking directly for a 4" setup.

But, my point is why not get 3" pipe if its not going to cost you that much more? I'm not saying everybody should buy their exhaust off of the For Sale boards, but I didn't pay $1 more than you did and I've got the 3" pipes. For the same price, can you honestly say you're happier with the 2.75"?

Besides, how large is the Y-pipe on these cars? 2.5"? If so, why would you want two 2.5" pipes running into a 2.75" pipe?
Old 10-01-2002 | 08:05 AM
  #21  
01SunsetOrangeSS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 46
From: South Florida
My Corsa catback made 15 RWHP more than the stock SS exhaust on the dyno. The Magnaflow muffler I have on my 95' Z28 made 7 more hp than the stock muffler. I sell these systems and have dyno tested nearly every exhaust system on the market. A 3" intermediate will always outflow a 2.75" intermediate pipe. Flow does count on a car without heads and cam, I have 356 RWHP with just intake and exhaust bolt ons.
Old 10-01-2002 | 10:05 AM
  #22  
96fbirdA4's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 221
From: Marysville, OH
Originally posted by 01SunsetOrangeSS
My Corsa catback made 15 RWHP more than the stock SS exhaust on the dyno. The Magnaflow muffler I have on my 95' Z28 made 7 more hp than the stock muffler. I sell these systems and have dyno tested nearly every exhaust system on the market. A 3" intermediate will always outflow a 2.75" intermediate pipe. Flow does count on a car without heads and cam, I have 356 RWHP with just intake and exhaust bolt ons.
I couldn't have said it better myself. That extra inch of cross-sectional area makes a difference.
Old 10-01-2002 | 05:18 PM
  #23  
ratio411's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 511
From: Soon to be Pensacola
Thumbs up

Originally posted by 96fbirdA4
I didn't pay $1 more than you did and I've got the 3" pipes. For the same price, can you honestly say you're happier with the 2.75"?
I paid $140 with professional installation. The parts were much less.
I am just fine with the set-up until I get more mods on my car. As long as I keep pulling the same/better numbers on the dyno as guys with 3" systems, I am elated!
Dave
Old 10-02-2002 | 06:20 AM
  #24  
96fbirdA4's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 221
From: Marysville, OH
Originally posted by ratio411
I paid $140 with professional installation
OOOOOooohh professional installation.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jeff1904
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
5
06-05-2016 05:00 PM
David Dempsey
New Member Introduction
5
03-12-2016 12:42 AM
WobblySausage
LT1 Based Engine Tech
6
10-07-2015 02:44 PM
WobblySausage
Drivetrain
4
10-07-2015 10:09 AM
68camaroboltz
Fuel and Ignition
2
10-05-2015 01:46 PM



Quick Reply: Took your advice, and here are the results....



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:20 PM.