What is the true story behind the 160' thermo??

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

09-05-2002 | 06:02 PM

#16

BlackHawk T/A

Registered User

Joined: Aug 2002

Posts: 240

From: Lincoln, NE

You don't need it anyway, just lower your fan settings.

------------------
1983 Monte Carlo, 307 Stroker, TH350, 3.73 10-Bolt - SOLD 8/19/02

Future F-Body Owner

09-05-2002 | 07:12 PM

#17

Freak

Registered User

Joined: Nov 1999

Posts: 446

From: Lincoln Park, MI US

Quote:

<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by ratio411:
Heat = Detonation more often than not on our cars.
</font>

My car saw no detonation out of all the Autotaps I have done untill I got the cam. if you use 92-94 octane gas most will never see it with a mildly modded motor. (I did get it one time with the HPP3 and a ported MAF. so I removed the tuning)

09-05-2002 | 10:17 PM

#18

99blackz99

Registered User

Joined: Aug 2002

Posts: 213

From: Hobart, IN, USA

The 160 was the first thing I put on my car with no other mods I could really tell a differance, it was more torqy, it made the car run more like it does when you first start it.