LS1 Based Engine Tech LS1 / LS6 / LS2 / LS3 / LS7 Engine Tech

Worst LS1 dyno ever?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-19-2004 | 11:52 AM
  #1  
2000Formula's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 18
Angry Worst LS1 dyno ever?

This weekend I was a mini vacation and there's a Truck shop with a dyno near where I was staying so I went to get it dynoed. The results were..... 236 HP @140 MPH, and 319.8tq@102 MPH. I asked why it wasn't done with RPM's and he said that it was more accurate this way??? This was a Mustang dyno, although I'm not sure what model. When I was paying for it I noticed there sign said the dyno was good for 900 HP and up to 150 MPH, so i'm thinking this is why the results were off. I didn't think of it at the time, but I should have asked them to do it in 2nd gear as well, one time when he was getting up to speed and didn't have it far enough to get it into 3rd I saw a 336 tq number.
Old 01-19-2004 | 12:10 PM
  #2  
psychocabbage's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,902
From: Houston, Tx USA
Mustang brand dynos will show a lower number every time.


reason is that its supposed to be a more accurate number..

thats what they tell you, but how 240rwhp propels a 3700lb car through the 1/4 mile in low 13's I have no idea...

haha

as stated in the other dyno post.. I may try out a Mustang dyno nearby to see how the numbers look compared to my 40+ dyno jet pulls..
Old 01-19-2004 | 01:13 PM
  #3  
tailwindxr7's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 204
From: Stonington, CT.
If your car is really running these times:

13.124@106.01 w/1.9 60'

Then you should'nt give a damn what any dyno says. Yes, Mustang dynos usually read lower than Dynojets, but even 230-240hp seems below average. But if the track numbers are correct, the car is fine. With a 106 trap, I'd assume you'd be in the 300-310rwhp range on a Dynojet.
Old 01-19-2004 | 02:05 PM
  #4  
DT's Avatar
DT
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 149
From: MEDIA, PA
Those numbers real dont jive with the 1/4 mile times. Why was the torque great @ 319 and the hp so low?
Old 01-19-2004 | 04:26 PM
  #5  
boomcase's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 76
I dynoed 311hp and 333tq and my car was running 110mph in an auto with 273s. Every dyno is going to get different results.
Old 01-19-2004 | 05:37 PM
  #6  
psychocabbage's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,902
From: Houston, Tx USA
ya know what would be kewl? A dyno at the track.. get track times and a few dyno pulls all in one along with weather readouts...

that would so rox..

anyone have a few hundred thou to get it started?
Old 01-19-2004 | 06:53 PM
  #7  
96LT14u2Nv's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 980
From: batavia, ohio
yeah, thats off!!!! your 1/4 mile times PROVE that!!!! i would guess more in the area of 280-290 RWHP
Old 01-19-2004 | 07:41 PM
  #8  
Blownbird355's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 564
From: Huntington, W.V. 25701
this is an auto car right

Did he do the pulls in 3rd cause i should be done in the one to one ratio.
Old 01-19-2004 | 08:12 PM
  #9  
ULTIMTEORANGESS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 737
From: eatontown nj united states
was your cutout open?my car dynoed like **** but my ET is where it should be so im not concerned.dyno #s mean nothing.
Old 01-20-2004 | 08:17 AM
  #10  
DT's Avatar
DT
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 149
From: MEDIA, PA
Originally posted by psychocabbage
ya know what would be kewl? A dyno at the track.. get track times and a few dyno pulls all in one along with weather readouts...

that would so rox..

anyone have a few hundred thou to get it started?
They usually have that mobile Dyno thing at e-town ricer nationals but it doesnt seem very well run.
Old 01-20-2004 | 11:38 AM
  #11  
2000Formula's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 18
Originally posted by DT
Those numbers real dont jive with the 1/4 mile times. Why was the torque great @ 319 and the hp so low?
The 1/4 mile times are accurate, and the dyno was done in third gear. I'm not sure how much individual calibrating is needed on each car, but he said that the 140 mph was at about 5400 RPMS, shouldn't it have been in the 160's at that RPM?

The cutout was open, and i did have 2 sandbags in the back(i don't think that would affect the dyno, just saying). With the air filter out i gained 2 tq and lost 2 hp.
Old 01-20-2004 | 11:49 AM
  #12  
DT's Avatar
DT
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 149
From: MEDIA, PA
Originally posted by 2000Formula
The 1/4 mile times are accurate, and the dyno was done in third gear. I'm not sure how much individual calibrating is needed on each car, but he said that the 140 mph was at about 5400 RPMS, shouldn't it have been in the 160's at that RPM?

The cutout was open, and i did have 2 sandbags in the back(i don't think that would affect the dyno, just saying). With the air filter out i gained 2 tq and lost 2 hp.
I know we are talking about different dynos but i gained 11 hp and 11 torque without my airfilter, i would disregard those results and get it done somewhere else.
Old 01-21-2004 | 05:02 AM
  #13  
MauriSSio's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 378
From: San Jose
like other people here said,dynos are only a fraction of the story,your car is runnin the MPH's it should so dont worry its puttin down the proper power whether the dyno tells u or not
Old 01-21-2004 | 12:20 PM
  #14  
darrens99formul's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 989
From: Rochester, NY
Never trust a Mustang............................Dyno that is

Yeah I hear they always underrate the RWHP. The dynojet is more accurate and like the others here have said, your trap speed indicates a good 300 RWHP. But to answer the question as originally worded, the lowest LS1 Dynojet number I have heard was about 260 RWHP on a 99 TA with an A4 tranny. That seemed very low to me when I heard it and was giving the car owner my condolenses.

But then again there could have been a problem with the dyno or with his car to cause the low numbers.

Good luck with the next dyno session
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ericksd
Drivetrain
4
01-20-2016 06:07 PM
Bxlt1
Drivetrain
2
09-29-2015 03:18 PM
Daluchman1974
Cars For Sale
1
09-11-2015 06:12 AM
jackpawt883
LT1 Based Engine Tech
7
09-10-2015 08:53 PM



Quick Reply: Worst LS1 dyno ever?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:27 AM.