1993 Trans AM need info
#16
Originally posted by allmotorta
Yep, I'm there a lot. I have a pic of me there on my site, its not a good pic, but I'm there. I haven't been to Rt. 66, I wanna go though, it would be cool to race on a "proffesional" track. 41 is kind of a hillbilly track, tech inspection doesn't exist (kinda cool in its own ways), and the track itself isn't the best. It usually hooks pretty damn good though, maybe I'll see ya there sometime. Email me when you go, maybe I'll make it out there.
Yep, I'm there a lot. I have a pic of me there on my site, its not a good pic, but I'm there. I haven't been to Rt. 66, I wanna go though, it would be cool to race on a "proffesional" track. 41 is kind of a hillbilly track, tech inspection doesn't exist (kinda cool in its own ways), and the track itself isn't the best. It usually hooks pretty damn good though, maybe I'll see ya there sometime. Email me when you go, maybe I'll make it out there.
#17
if you are looking between a 93 and a 94 i would say go with the 93. 92 and 93 were the only years for speed density in the LT1 (92 in the vette) they both use the non-vented optispark, but i believe the 93 is easier to program because it still uses the eprom chip, much cheaper that way. the 94 and up do use the flash prom but you have to send your whole computer to be reprogramed. plus i believe the 93 speed density responds better to basic bolt on parts than the 94 and up mass air motors. just my .02 cents.
Fullagar
Fullagar
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sarahrope64
LT1 Based Engine Tech
0
11-27-2014 11:17 AM
chevroletfreak
LT1 Based Engine Tech
202
07-04-2005 05:00 PM
formula79
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
23
06-20-2002 01:42 PM