392 rwhp....387 rwtq...is that good?
#1
392 rwhp....387 rwtq...is that good?
Considering I was running on 7 cyl...lol. Looks like its all boiling down to a bad opti on my car..first it was a 6750 rpm shutdown then it stopped firing all my plugs. I checked the car worming up with a laser temp guage. Every cyl. was heating up within 30-50 deg of each other and would go to 400-500 deg range when I would rev the motor..the # 4 stayed in the 100-115 temp range even when reved. Plug is wet so I know the inj. is firing and tried a new plug wire..still doing the same thing. Oh well..time for a new opti and see what we can get out of this thing with the new heads and hopefully all the bugs worked out.
Results should be known soon....any guess what a v8 power is conpaired to a v7?
Results should be known soon....any guess what a v8 power is conpaired to a v7?
Last edited by 95Bird; 01-25-2005 at 09:57 AM.
#3
Re: 392 rwhp....387 rwtq...is that good?
I agree on the high rpm's, and very nice #'s for only being on 7 cyl. Get it fix and dynoed again, see what she's really got.
BTW-whats the spec's on your soild roller? Unless they are a secert..
BTW-whats the spec's on your soild roller? Unless they are a secert..
#4
Re: 392 rwhp....387 rwtq...is that good?
I know that Joe O takes his way above that...I'm hoping to at least be able to take it to 7200 with the new one.
The car has already made 30 rwhp peak and 50 rwhp(6750) over the old heads dyno curve..that was with the issues in the upper rpms that I thnk were costing me some hp. I think that it should pull well to 7000 rpms where my old heads fell off at 6550 and I was way down on hp by 6900.
Cam is cam motion 255/263 dur with 652/628 lift.
The car has already made 30 rwhp peak and 50 rwhp(6750) over the old heads dyno curve..that was with the issues in the upper rpms that I thnk were costing me some hp. I think that it should pull well to 7000 rpms where my old heads fell off at 6550 and I was way down on hp by 6900.
Cam is cam motion 255/263 dur with 652/628 lift.
Last edited by 95Bird; 01-25-2005 at 01:17 PM.
#9
Re: 392 rwhp....387 rwtq...is that good?
Originally Posted by stik6shift93
Sounds like somebody's gonna get the 6speed na record. What do you think the car has in it on motor?
Originally Posted by Jason Short
Tim, glad to see that you hopefully have the problem figured out! I say you have 460rw there. Cant wait to see the new times!
Jason
Jason
Last edited by 95Bird; 01-25-2005 at 01:50 PM.
#10
Re: 392 rwhp....387 rwtq...is that good?
You still having problems with that? Just get it fixed!
Looking forward racing this year. Might have something up my sleeve that will give the LS1's run for the money in my class.
Looking forward racing this year. Might have something up my sleeve that will give the LS1's run for the money in my class.
#11
Re: 392 rwhp....387 rwtq...is that good?
lol..yea..hopefully I will have it fixed this week...I work on it a while then get disgusted with it and take a brake.
You do know that you don't have a class this year right. Your old class is no more. The first class available is the class that the thunder car and I fit into.
You do know that you don't have a class this year right. Your old class is no more. The first class available is the class that the thunder car and I fit into.
#15
Re: 392 rwhp....387 rwtq...is that good?
Originally Posted by 95Bird
You do know that you don't have a class this year right. Your old class is no more. The first class available is the class that the thunder car and I fit into.