408 LT1 build
#46
Why is there no reason to build a 408...besides bragging rights? (in reference to the 383 or 396 comment). I read where it stated the hp output for the 383...are you saying that there is no more hp to be gained from an lt1 motor greater than a 383 just torque, or are you saying that the (hp/reliability) to (cost to build) ratio is really small?
hope Im not hijacking, but... what would be the most ci to get the most hp and tq with the greatest reliability.
Sorry, just currious (i was always told that if you didnt know, you should ask)
Pride
hope Im not hijacking, but... what would be the most ci to get the most hp and tq with the greatest reliability.
Sorry, just currious (i was always told that if you didnt know, you should ask)
Pride
Last edited by 350pride; 02-29-2008 at 01:30 PM.
#47
Why is there no reason to build a 408...besides bragging rights? (in reference to the 383 or 396 comment). I read where it stated the hp output for the 383...are you saying that there is no more hp to be gained from an lt1 motor greater than a 383 just torque, or are you saying that the (hp/reliability) to (cost to build) ratio is really small?
hope Im not hijacking, but... what would be the most ci to get the most hp and tq with the greatest reliability.
Sorry, just currious (i was always told that if you didnt know, you should ask)
Pride
hope Im not hijacking, but... what would be the most ci to get the most hp and tq with the greatest reliability.
Sorry, just currious (i was always told that if you didnt know, you should ask)
Pride
#48
Do you folks think a 5.85" rod with 1.125" compression height piston would work at all?
I figure if I end up with a non repairable leaker I will get a dart block and start over. I own an ice company so I get to play very little in the summer and wanted to do something a little different. I probably could count the times I've had my car out in the past 4yrs. on 2 hands.
#49
Given the same combustion chamber size @TDC, if you increase the stroke, you increase the compression ratio.
#50
Why is there no reason to build a 408...besides bragging rights? (in reference to the 383 or 396 comment). I read where it stated the hp output for the 383...are you saying that there is no more hp to be gained from an lt1 motor greater than a 383 just torque, or are you saying that the (hp/reliability) to (cost to build) ratio is really small?
hope Im not hijacking, but... what would be the most ci to get the most hp and tq with the greatest reliability.
Sorry, just currious (i was always told that if you didnt know, you should ask)
Pride
hope Im not hijacking, but... what would be the most ci to get the most hp and tq with the greatest reliability.
Sorry, just currious (i was always told that if you didnt know, you should ask)
Pride
The larger engines are limited by OE castings. That's why most people say that there is no rason to build a 408" LT1.
I counter that it will make more usable power. And if you are going to use heads that can take a 408" engine to over 7000RPM, then why not?
#51
I do know the original Kit I looked at had a 5.85 rod; I believe it was a JE piston don't recall for sure. It was discontinued though. I ended up with the 6inch rod and Ross customs. I can say my piston to counterweight clearance is pretty tight. maybe 1/8 inch or something like that. a lot in machinist terms but still close enough for me.
I figure if I end up with a non repairable leaker I will get a dart block and start over. I own an ice company so I get to play very little in the summer and wanted to do something a little different. I probably could count the times I've had my car out in the past 4yrs. on 2 hands.
I figure if I end up with a non repairable leaker I will get a dart block and start over. I own an ice company so I get to play very little in the summer and wanted to do something a little different. I probably could count the times I've had my car out in the past 4yrs. on 2 hands.
#52
#53
Look, this is simple. More cubes always improve performance on a street motor and usually on a race motor as well. But there are limits related to basic block architecture. Once you start approaching them, the cost/benefit ratio will become unfavorable. And there is a point which to go beyond is basically impossible. A 408 LT1 is certainly approaching the point where most people would say "not worth it". But to each his own, variety being the spice of life and all that.
Also, the potential power gains per ci start to become less as the bore/stroke ratio becomes less favorable, limitations of the available heads start to be approached, etc. These are all things that have been discussed here, for some reason I felt like a little summary. Maybe later I will go into some detail about real worl examples, because I have been there/done that or have had buddies who have. done so. It really is true that IF you use the same heads, cam, etc. and just increase the displacement by stroking the motor, there will be NO gain in hp, though low end torque will improve (not peak torque though) and you will make the power at lower rpm. Increasing the bore is better, as it promotes head flow, but the ability to do that is strictly limited by the block casting.
You can think up some very wierd examples that don't follow the above scenario, but they are seldom encountered in real life.
Rich
Also, the potential power gains per ci start to become less as the bore/stroke ratio becomes less favorable, limitations of the available heads start to be approached, etc. These are all things that have been discussed here, for some reason I felt like a little summary. Maybe later I will go into some detail about real worl examples, because I have been there/done that or have had buddies who have. done so. It really is true that IF you use the same heads, cam, etc. and just increase the displacement by stroking the motor, there will be NO gain in hp, though low end torque will improve (not peak torque though) and you will make the power at lower rpm. Increasing the bore is better, as it promotes head flow, but the ability to do that is strictly limited by the block casting.
You can think up some very wierd examples that don't follow the above scenario, but they are seldom encountered in real life.
Rich
Last edited by rskrause; 03-01-2008 at 01:36 PM.
#55
no offence taken. I posted here knowing I would get a difference of opinions. Pressure check went good though. As long as the devcon holds like others say it has for them I should be ok. I just worry about the first heat up. My engine builder did a 383 that went through and he was able to pin it successfuly. but I am aware if it leaks its a BIG issue.
#56
no offence taken. I posted here knowing I would get a difference of opinions. Pressure check went good though. As long as the devcon holds like others say it has for them I should be ok. I just worry about the first heat up. My engine builder did a 383 that went through and he was able to pin it successfuly. but I am aware if it leaks its a BIG issue.
But I have seen others leak inside the engine later on. I'm not really familiar with the different epoxy types etc.
#57
Rich,
I believe you said you broke through on yours. What did your repair consist of besides the devcon? that is if you don't mind me asking. How big of a hole did you have in yours? has it caused any issues ?
thanks in advance.
I believe you said you broke through on yours. What did your repair consist of besides the devcon? that is if you don't mind me asking. How big of a hole did you have in yours? has it caused any issues ?
thanks in advance.
#58
Rich
edit: I meant four times, twice no problem.
Last edited by rskrause; 03-02-2008 at 06:26 AM.
#59
A 408 LT1 is certainly approaching the point where most people would say "not worth it". But to each his own, variety being the spice of life and all that.
It really is true that IF you use the same heads, cam, etc. and just increase the displacement by stroking the motor, there will be NO gain in hp, though low end torque will improve (not peak torque though) and you will make the power at lower rpm. Increasing the bore is better, as it promotes head flow, but the ability to do that is strictly limited by the block casting.
You can think up some very wierd examples that don't follow the above scenario, but they are seldom encountered in real life.
Rich
It really is true that IF you use the same heads, cam, etc. and just increase the displacement by stroking the motor, there will be NO gain in hp, though low end torque will improve (not peak torque though) and you will make the power at lower rpm. Increasing the bore is better, as it promotes head flow, but the ability to do that is strictly limited by the block casting.
You can think up some very wierd examples that don't follow the above scenario, but they are seldom encountered in real life.
Rich
#60
Just wanted to let everyone know the 408 is alive! I've had it running a few times and had it up to temp a couple of times with no leaks so far. (pray for me please... lol)
It has been a interesting ordeal to say the least. Thanks for everyone's input on the subject and I will try to give updates as to weather it fails or not.
It has been a interesting ordeal to say the least. Thanks for everyone's input on the subject and I will try to give updates as to weather it fails or not.