486rwhp, 571lb-ft: Fairly Stock LT1!
#31
Re: 486rwhp, 571lb-ft: Fairly Stock LT1!
I found this thread kinda hard to believe myself, ive thought this for awile. Thats alot of power just to have a cam. Thats prolly 220 rwhp over a bone stock lt1
#33
Re: 486rwhp, 571lb-ft: Fairly Stock LT1!
you have aquired some very nice power numbers,it easy to fool some unsuspecting souls with them,i am definately not a fan of ZEX but whatever you hit some good tq with that!congrads!
#34
Re: 486rwhp, 571lb-ft: Fairly Stock LT1!
Originally Posted by 96m6lt1
you have aquired some very nice power numbers,it easy to fool some unsuspecting souls with them,i am definately not a fan of ZEX but whatever you hit some good tq with that!congrads!
Mr. Trickflow
#35
Re: 486rwhp, 571lb-ft: Fairly Stock LT1!
Originally Posted by my94blackz
I found this thread kinda hard to believe myself, ive thought this for awile. Thats alot of power just to have a cam. Thats prolly 220 rwhp over a bone stock lt1
That is exactly why I made the thread, as I was as impressed with it as anyone. I also made sure to have the dyno sheet and video available for anyone to see before the BS flags were raised.
As for differences in dyno's, maybe the car would have made more or less power on a different dyno, fine. We dont race dynos. But 571tq on one dyno isnt going to be 400tq on another, the car clearly is performing well for pennies. I feel my mid 120 mph traps were evident of that as well. From any calculations I've done, to get an fbody trapping mid 120s would require a similar amount of hp.
If anyone else doubts it, thats fine, I hope plenty that I race this year dont think my winter ride has it in it $$$
As for motor runs, I didnt care. This engine was assembled with its budget shot in mind, was tuned with its shot in mind, and is raced with that shot. You wont catch me racing without my bottle and slicks, I dont bring a knife to a gunfight. We made a quick shakedown run to make sure I wasnt getting any detonation with the crappy winter gas, and it performed as Jason mentioned previously in the thread. I saw no need in putting an NA tune in and wasting any more dyno time and $. I felt it performed comparibly well with the usual hotcam, RR, headers, exhuast cars seen on here daily. Then it was time to show what it really has.
Last edited by Bad AZz Z28; 02-21-2005 at 01:28 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dbusch22
Forced Induction
6
10-31-2016 11:09 AM
oldschool
Parts For Sale
16
02-09-2016 09:21 PM
Brandon Wittmer
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
3
12-03-2014 09:28 PM