LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

9:1 or 11:1 better?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-19-2003, 07:03 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Kurt Crosbie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 1,726
9:1 or 11:1 better?

Which compression ratio is optimal for more power?

In case it matters, I'm taking an LT1 motor and rebuilding...355, 383, or 396. Haven't decided yet.
Kurt Crosbie is offline  
Old 09-19-2003, 07:43 AM
  #2  
Registered User
 
Kyle@CSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Myrtle Beach SC
Posts: 1,706
Any powr adders? Is this going to be drivin every day?
Kyle@CSS is offline  
Old 09-19-2003, 08:06 AM
  #3  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Kurt Crosbie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 1,726
Yes, it will be a daily driver. Power addrs? I will do what I need to reach around 500hp.
Kurt Crosbie is offline  
Old 09-19-2003, 08:06 AM
  #4  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Kurt Crosbie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 1,726
Yes, it will be a daily driver. Power addrs? I will do what I need to reach around 500hp.
Kurt Crosbie is offline  
Old 09-19-2003, 08:37 AM
  #5  
Registered User
 
predator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 741
well you dont want high comp with a blower and 11.1 is going to be pushing the realms of pump gas
predator is offline  
Old 09-19-2003, 08:47 AM
  #6  
Registered User
 
zjet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 221
a stock lt-1 has 11.1 compression.they run fine on pump gas.
zjet is offline  
Old 09-19-2003, 08:53 AM
  #7  
Registered User
 
predator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 741
i think you better read again it is more like 10.5
predator is offline  
Old 09-19-2003, 08:56 AM
  #8  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Kurt Crosbie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 1,726
Well, which is better for making power? A high number (like 11:1) or a low number (like 9:1)
Kurt Crosbie is offline  
Old 09-19-2003, 08:57 AM
  #9  
Registered User
 
predator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 741
N/a with the right supporting parts cam etc 11.1 and right gas
predator is offline  
Old 09-19-2003, 01:59 PM
  #10  
Registered User
 
llafro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: West Coast
Posts: 408
Don't just look at the static compression ratio. You have to look at the dynamic compression ratio. That takes into account the valve opening and closing events, so you know what the compression really is. You can safely run more compression with a big cam.

I run shaved heads along with the thinner Impala head gaskets to raise the compression up to 11.8:1. I have a bigger cam (comp XE 230/236), so the dynamic compression ratio is safe. I run it on California MTBE 91 octane with no problem.
llafro is offline  
Old 09-19-2003, 02:07 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
zjet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 221
i havent check my z28,put my 94 corvette as 11.1 nevr been touched motor .it maybe the vettes and zs are different.
zjet is offline  
Old 09-19-2003, 02:55 PM
  #12  
Registered User
 
JoeliusZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Detroit
Posts: 2,926
my manual claims 10.5
JoeliusZ28 is offline  
Old 09-19-2003, 03:27 PM
  #13  
Registered User
 
amean94ta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: pa
Posts: 1,991
Originally posted by llafro
Don't just look at the static compression ratio. You have to look at the dynamic compression ratio. That takes into account the valve opening and closing events, so you know what the compression really is. You can safely run more compression with a big cam.

I run shaved heads along with the thinner Impala head gaskets to raise the compression up to 11.8:1. I have a bigger cam (comp XE 230/236), so the dynamic compression ratio is safe. I run it on California MTBE 91 octane with no problem.
yes it might run fine on 91 but only because the computer retards timing automaticaly you would get a big benefit from runing 113 or better
amean94ta is offline  
Old 09-20-2003, 04:38 AM
  #14  
Registered User
 
QCKZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Christiansburg, VA
Posts: 1,853
you shouldnt have to run 100+ octane until its over 12.0-12.5:1.
ive read many posts about this, try doing a search. be surprising what you will learn.
my CR is 11.3:1 and runs fine with 93 octane, i saw no improvement at the track while running 100 octane.

back to the question
1. as a rule n/a more compression=more hp
i dont think i would go higher than 11.5 on pump gas
2. you cant run boost on a high OR motor, s/c or turbo motors like to use a CR around 8 to 9:1
3. N20 (the best power adder IMO) doesnt require a low CR like turbo or superchargers

hope this helps
QCKZ28 is offline  
Old 09-20-2003, 12:58 PM
  #15  
Registered User
 
Got-LT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: tallahassee, FL
Posts: 811
Originally posted by JoeliusZ28
my manual claims 10.5
I have always seen LT1s on 10.4 to 1 CR, not a big difference but just letting everyone know.

If you are not ruuning a power adder, go 11 to 1, that's what I'll be doing.
Got-LT1 is offline  


Quick Reply: 9:1 or 11:1 better?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:36 AM.