LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

AFR 210's flow #'s from Lloyd

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-07-2004, 12:14 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
RealQuick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Bridgewater, MA
Posts: 5,645
AFR 210's flow #'s from Lloyd

Well, Lloyd emailed me my flow #'s for my AFR210's that he finished porting from bare castings. I believe he used 2.08/1.60 valves. Below is a comparison between my original LT1 ported heads he did (when I made 383rwhp/353rwtq N/A), AFR CNC 210's, and my AFR 210's Lloyd did.

..........Lloyd's LT1 Heads..........AFR CNC 210's................Lloyd's AFR 210's
.200........133/92..........................138/112............................143/103
.300........188/132........................201/150............................204/141
.400........233/155........................247/190............................247/173
.500........264/180........................276/207............................281/198
.600........274/191........................288/220............................308/219
.700...........................................297/230............................311/227

I have less than 2k invested in these AFR heads from Lloyd (that includes the price of the AFR heads bare). All exhaust numbers from lloyd were done without a pipe. They should work well with the turbo. Combustion chamber will be 65cc and I havent gotten the size of the intake runners yet.
RealQuick is offline  
Old 12-07-2004, 12:32 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
ejfagala's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 324
Re: AFR 210's flow #'s from Lloyd

Wow,
Those things flow great, More did my 195's and they flow good but nothing like yours. 300 CFM @ 600 is great.
ejfagala is offline  
Old 12-07-2004, 12:33 PM
  #3  
Registered User
 
ajschult's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Eldridge, IA
Posts: 358
Re: AFR 210's flow #'s from Lloyd

Wow those are gonna be bad ***. What did you pay for the bare heads from afr? I was planning on going LE3 heads, but if the price isnt much more I'd rather buy some bare afr's and send those to lloyd.
ajschult is offline  
Old 12-07-2004, 12:40 PM
  #4  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
RealQuick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Bridgewater, MA
Posts: 5,645
Re: AFR 210's flow #'s from Lloyd

Originally Posted by ajschult
Wow those are gonna be bad ***. What did you pay for the bare heads from afr? I was planning on going LE3 heads, but if the price isnt much more I'd rather buy some bare afr's and send those to lloyd.
They can cost 1000-1200 NEW bare (no port work at all). I got a deal on mine.
RealQuick is offline  
Old 12-07-2004, 04:37 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
NJLT1SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Montville, NJ, U.S.A.
Posts: 661
Re: AFR 210's flow #'s from Lloyd

Those are some nice numbers. What is the finished size of the intake runner?
NJLT1SS is offline  
Old 12-07-2004, 04:46 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
Chris'SS #2152's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Joliet, IL
Posts: 332
Re: AFR 210's flow #'s from Lloyd

Those things will be SWEET!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Chris'SS #2152 is offline  
Old 12-07-2004, 04:58 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
bunker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: North Vancouver, BC
Posts: 4,305
Re: AFR 210's flow #'s from Lloyd

I have 2 cars at home with Lloyd heads, going back to dyno on mine after Ti retainers and going to dyno with other car that has lloyd head for first time dyno.

bla I can't talk for some reason


Anywho, Lloyd is great!
bunker is offline  
Old 12-07-2004, 06:02 PM
  #8  
Registered User
 
jkipp84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: High Orbit
Posts: 1,519
Re: AFR 210's flow #'s from Lloyd

NICE
jkipp84 is offline  
Old 12-07-2004, 06:08 PM
  #9  
Registered User
 
Loony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Wildwood, MO
Posts: 584
Re: AFR 210's flow #'s from Lloyd

How come the exhausts flow not so much compared to the other AFR's

Is that somthing you do for a turbo?
Loony is offline  
Old 12-07-2004, 08:25 PM
  #10  
Registered User
 
bunker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: North Vancouver, BC
Posts: 4,305
Re: AFR 210's flow #'s from Lloyd

Cuz AFR's numbers are BS most of the time
bunker is offline  
Old 12-07-2004, 09:44 PM
  #11  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
RealQuick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Bridgewater, MA
Posts: 5,645
Re: AFR 210's flow #'s from Lloyd

Originally Posted by NJLT1SS
Those are some nice numbers. What is the finished size of the intake runner?
I am awaiting the cc's from lloyd.
RealQuick is offline  
Old 12-07-2004, 11:20 PM
  #12  
Registered User
 
Deenasty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1,322
Re: AFR 210's flow #'s from Lloyd

how did the exhaust flow get smaller from the stock casting afr to the lloyd ported afr?
Deenasty is offline  
Old 12-08-2004, 06:36 AM
  #13  
Banned
 
SStrokerAce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,518
Re: AFR 210's flow #'s from Lloyd

Originally Posted by RealQuick
I am awaiting the cc's from lloyd.
Remember the runner volume only tells you a story if you also have the average port length and min cross sectional area.

Bret
SStrokerAce is offline  
Old 12-08-2004, 07:36 AM
  #14  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
RealQuick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Bridgewater, MA
Posts: 5,645
Re: AFR 210's flow #'s from Lloyd

Originally Posted by Deenasty
how did the exhaust flow get smaller from the stock casting afr to the lloyd ported afr?
It didnt get smaller. I showed the # that you would get from AFR's CNC fully ported heads (based on their website info) versus Lloyd porting a set of unported AFR's.
RealQuick is offline  
Old 12-08-2004, 11:12 AM
  #15  
Registered User
 
IllusionalTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Long Island, NY ; Norfolk, VA
Posts: 1,542
Re: AFR 210's flow #'s from Lloyd

Great number's.. Glad to see some "real" world #'s.. As compared to lloyd's LT1 casting's on his own bench!
IllusionalTA is offline  


Quick Reply: AFR 210's flow #'s from Lloyd



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:02 PM.