LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Am I down on power?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-06-2007, 02:20 PM
  #31  
Registered User
 
<Puck>'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 321
Originally Posted by SS RRR
As stated I really don't believe in noting 5 or 10rwhp gains. Way too many variables come into play.
While 5rwhp may very well be in a margin of error, 10 to the wheels is significant. By your logic, seemingly everything save for LT's,ported heads, cam, and nitrous are not worth it, since they will only add the possible margin of error or so.

Not much will get you 10 to the wheels after basic mods. I would gladly pay quite a bit - much more then what a mail order tune goes for - for a consistant 10 more rwhp.
<Puck> is offline  
Old 09-06-2007, 08:35 PM
  #32  
Registered User
 
SS RRR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1998
Location: Jackstandican
Posts: 3,144
Originally Posted by Z-RATED94
That is a nice gain, but maybe weather played a part in it. And maybe some of your other mods were waiting for the LTs to help the overall picture? But I'll still take those 5-10 HP gains any chance I get. It's the little things that add up, as you already know, right?
And one last thought. Maybe your tune was off a little, and benefited from the header swap. Free updated tune? Thats pretty cool.
You're funny. Seems you'll grasp at anything for the sake of argument.
The weather had absolutely nothing to do with the gain. It's as if you think I've only ran the car with certain applications one time in different weather conditions. Don't be stupid.
Before the LT's were on the engine the car was dyno tuned with a wideband by Ed Wright at his shop in Oklahoma. He spent the better part of 5 hours with it and that tune has been used as a baseline for several other cars with the same application so the tune wasn't off. With your line of thinking I guess I should've started a trend and announced to everyone here to get a FastChip tune first and then LT headers because the gain will be substantial because the tune is slightly off and LT's will be more beneficial to an engine that has been tuned for another appliation. Where's the retard smiley icon when you need it...
You can take those minor gains if you want. I just can't say with a clear conscious that I gained 5rwhp doing "X" mod.
What you are missing here is my gain is more than likely higher due to the difference in mods. However from past members posting who've done the bolt-on/stock exhaust to LT/ORY mod their gains have more than 5 or 10rwhp and definately better than 1rwhp.
Anything else you'd like to argue or pontificate?
SS RRR is offline  
Old 09-06-2007, 08:36 PM
  #33  
Registered User
 
SS RRR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1998
Location: Jackstandican
Posts: 3,144
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by <Puck>
While 5rwhp may very well be in a margin of error, 10 to the wheels is significant. By your logic, seemingly everything save for LT's,ported heads, cam, and nitrous are not worth it, since they will only add the possible margin of error or so.

Not much will get you 10 to the wheels after basic mods. I would gladly pay quite a bit - much more then what a mail order tune goes for - for a consistant 10 more rwhp.
More power to you!
SS RRR is offline  
Old 09-06-2007, 09:24 PM
  #34  
Registered User
 
Z-RATED94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Carol Stream, Il.
Posts: 3,557
Originally Posted by SS RRR
You're funny. Seems you'll grasp at anything for the sake of argument.
The weather had absolutely nothing to do with the gain. It's as if you think I've only ran the car with certain applications one time in different weather conditions. Don't be stupid.
Before the LT's were on the engine the car was dyno tuned with a wideband by Ed Wright at his shop in Oklahoma. He spent the better part of 5 hours with it and that tune has been used as a baseline for several other cars with the same application so the tune wasn't off. With your line of thinking I guess I should've started a trend and announced to everyone here to get a FastChip tune first and then LT headers because the gain will be substantial because the tune is slightly off and LT's will be more beneficial to an engine that has been tuned for another appliation. Where's the retard smiley icon when you need it...
You can take those minor gains if you want. I just can't say with a clear conscious that I gained 5rwhp doing "X" mod.
What you are missing here is my gain is more than likely higher due to the difference in mods. However from past members posting who've done the bolt-on/stock exhaust to LT/ORY mod their gains have more than 5 or 10rwhp and definately better than 1rwhp.
Anything else you'd like to argue or pontificate?
Thanks for the clarification.
Z-RATED94 is offline  
Old 09-06-2007, 11:18 PM
  #35  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Jeremy95TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 282
So basically it seems that I'm around where I should be for power with the 9". I'm guessing that the 9" has about the same drivetrain loss as an auto then.

Originally Posted by <Puck>
You really need a tune even on a stock LT1, and that rear is way overkill for your mild setup. 9" is way too much drivetrain loss for a CAI/exhaust LT1 - that is probably why your numbers havent changed much.

Of course you should datalog to check for things like false knock and running rich(which you probably are since the exhaust leak), but nothing is probably wrong with your car.

A bit off topic, but a 12 bolt is not an easy rear end to break. I cannot think of three people I know who have broken them myself...Were they on adjustable suspension components and self installed gears? Sounds like user error to me. Bad pinion angle or not properly meshed gears will grenade a rear in no time -much more likely IMO. Of course everyones experiences will vary, and autos are a lot more gentle then a stick, but I have ran 11's on my 10 bolt(knock on wood). A 12 bolt upgrade will be in my future, but I see no need for a 9" on a street/strip LT1.

**edit*** For reference my Z barely touched 265 to the wheels when it had all the bolt-ons(except for EWP) through a 3k fuddle and a 10-bolt. That is also including things people miss like 1.6rr's, ignition, tune, etc. I can't believe how many people get(or claim) 300+ to the wheels with just headers/cai/exhaust - but I am not there so what do I know *shrug*. That modest rwhp ran consistant 12.8's all day though **edit**
Yes, the 9" is a bit overkill right now. However, everything I do to my car is built with a final goal in mind. My goal is a H/C/N2O 383. Plus I want to keep it a 6 speed so I plan on launching it HARD. I already dump the clutch at about 5500 RPM's and thats off the bottle. When I put the bottle on its going to hit much harder.

For the record, I've got a friend with a 12 bolt 6 speed 420 rwhp LS1. He's broken 2 posi units and bent a 31 spline axle. The shop that did the work warrantied it all so that was a good for him. However, 12 bolts are just too weak for 6 speed cars. M6's are just too violent. Especially with how hard I plan on launching the car. Not to mention that I have a McCleod Street Twin so the clutch slipping shouldn't be in issue.
Jeremy95TA is offline  
Old 09-06-2007, 11:24 PM
  #36  
Registered User
 
SS RRR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1998
Location: Jackstandican
Posts: 3,144
Originally Posted by Jeremy95TA
So basically it seems that I'm around where I should be for power with the 9".
Even with the 9" it doesn't explain why your gain was nothing when you went LT's w/ ORY. Maybe it was a bad dyno day and the track will tell the story.
SS RRR is offline  
Old 09-06-2007, 11:39 PM
  #37  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Jeremy95TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 282
Originally Posted by SS RRR
Even with the 9" it doesn't explain why your gain was nothing when you went LT's w/ ORY. Maybe it was a bad dyno day and the track will tell the story.
Well its not exactly no gains. Remember, I had 260 rwhp no 9". Now 9" and boltons and making 268 rwhp. So I have 8 more rwhp than I did when I first got the car. I know that 9" is eating power. I just didn't know how much. You said it though, we'll see if I can get better than a 13.8 at the track.
Jeremy95TA is offline  
Old 09-07-2007, 08:39 AM
  #38  
Registered User
 
Z-RATED94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Carol Stream, Il.
Posts: 3,557
Originally Posted by Jeremy95TA
So basically it seems that I'm around where I should be for power with the 9". I'm guessing that the 9" has about the same drivetrain loss as an auto then.


Yes, the 9" is a bit overkill right now. However, everything I do to my car is built with a final goal in mind. My goal is a H/C/N2O 383. Plus I want to keep it a 6 speed so I plan on launching it HARD. I already dump the clutch at about 5500 RPM's and thats off the bottle. When I put the bottle on its going to hit much harder.

For the record, I've got a friend with a 12 bolt 6 speed 420 rwhp LS1. He's broken 2 posi units and bent a 31 spline axle. The shop that did the work warrantied it all so that was a good for him. However, 12 bolts are just too weak for 6 speed cars. M6's are just too violent. Especially with how hard I plan on launching the car. Not to mention that I have a McCleod Street Twin so the clutch slipping shouldn't be in issue.
The proper way to build the car is the way your going about it. No sense in having decent HP if the car can't take it and you keep breaking parts. That's the route I took. Minor bolt ons at first, while I starting installing suspension parts, sub-frame, etc. Then started saving for the H/C swap, and all the associated parts that go along with that.
And as you mentioned, 12 bolts aren't as strong as some people think, when it come to manual cars that launch hard.
Z-RATED94 is offline  
Old 09-07-2007, 08:40 AM
  #39  
Registered User
 
neat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 221
I think you're pretty much right on the money. I work in a speed shop and dyno cars almost every day and your numbers don't sound off to me. I can't definitively say what the 9 inch costs in power as compared to a 10 bolt, but I'm sure it's something.

I can almost guarantee 10 RWHP out of a tune on a stock car, 15 or so is the average. A little more if you've got some minor mods like longtubes, rockers, CAI, etc...

I agree that there is some variance on the dyno from run to run, but if the car is up to temp and running properly, the difference is usually pretty nominal. On my dynojet 224, a stock LT1, M6 will almost always (9 out of 10 times) make within 2 or 3 HP from pull to pull. I tuned one a month or so ago that was having some software problems with the computer, it took me forever to figure it out and I probably made 30 pulls with that car. As long as the car was up to temp, all the numbers were within about 2 RWHP. You'll see some bigger variances if you run the car cool and then hot, but if the engine is the same temp from run to run, the results are usually repeatable to within about 1.5%.

I have seen some greater differences from day to day though. I can dyno a stock LT1 car, repeatedly make 275 RWHP, and then let the car sit for a week without touching it. Strap it back down and have it make 10 RWHP more or less than it did last week. The software is supposed to correct for weather, but I don't think it's realistic to expect it to be dialed in to 10th degree. From pull to pull to the repeatability of the dyno is excellent, from day to day... don't get worked up over 5-10 RWHP. If you make a pull, and then immediately make another pull and lose 10 RWHP, you've most definitely got some looking around to do, but if you are 10 HP off from what you made last week, month, year; I don't think you should be worried.

That being said, a 5 RWHP gain on the dyno is pretty borderline to consider a legit gain, especially if it only shows up on one pull. If I make a pull, and peak power is 270 RWHP, then I make a change and the peak number goes to 275; you can usually tell if it's a dyno squiggle VS a real gain by how the graph looks. If there is a ramp up to the 5 HP gain, or the gain is across the entire graph, chances are it's legit. If you can repeat the 275 number then it's almost 100% certain that it's legit.

Good luck with the car, I don't think there is anything wrong with. It most definitely could benefit from a tuning session, but I don't think there is anything really wrong with your dyno numbers.

Last edited by neat; 09-07-2007 at 08:45 AM.
neat is offline  
Old 09-07-2007, 09:00 AM
  #40  
Registered User
 
<Puck>'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 321
Originally Posted by neat
I think you're pretty much right on the money. I work in a speed shop and dyno cars almost every day and your numbers don't sound off to me. I can't definitively say what the 9 inch costs in power as compared to a 10 bolt, but I'm sure it's something.

I can almost guarantee 10 RWHP out of a tune on a stock car, 15 or so is the average. A little more if you've got some minor mods like longtubes, rockers, CAI, etc...

I agree that there is some variance on the dyno from run to run, but if the car is up to temp and running properly, the difference is usually pretty nominal. On my dynojet 224, a stock LT1, M6 will almost always (9 out of 10 times) make within 2 or 3 HP from pull to pull. I tuned one a month or so ago that was having some software problems with the computer, it took me forever to figure it out and I probably made 30 pulls with that car. As long as the car was up to temp, all the numbers were within about 2 RWHP. You'll see some bigger variances if you run the car cool and then hot, but if the engine is the same temp from run to run, the results are usually repeatable to within about 1.5%.

I have seen some greater differences from day to day though. I can dyno a stock LT1 car, repeatedly make 275 RWHP, and then let the car sit for a week without touching it. Strap it back down and have it make 10 RWHP more or less than it did last week. The software is supposed to correct for weather, but I don't think it's realistic to expect it to be dialed in to 10th degree. From pull to pull to the repeatability of the dyno is excellent, from day to day... don't get worked up over 5-10 RWHP. If you make a pull, and then immediately make another pull and lose 10 RWHP, you've most definitely got some looking around to do, but if you are 10 HP off from what you made last week, month, year; I don't think you should be worried.

That being said, a 5 RWHP gain on the dyno is pretty borderline to consider a legit gain, especially if it only shows up on one pull. If I make a pull, and peak power is 270 RWHP, then I make a change and the peak number goes to 275; you can usually tell if it's a dyno squiggle VS a real gain by how the graph looks. If there is a ramp up to the 5 HP gain, or the gain is across the entire graph, chances are it's legit. If you can repeat the 275 number then it's almost 100% certain that it's legit.

Good luck with the car, I don't think there is anything wrong with. It most definitely could benefit from a tuning session, but I don't think there is anything really wrong with your dyno numbers.
Well said.
<Puck> is offline  
Old 09-07-2007, 09:38 AM
  #41  
Registered User
 
dangalla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: lakeville, pa
Posts: 2,092
Originally Posted by neat
I can almost guarantee 10 RWHP out of a tune on a stock car, 15 or so is the average. A little more if you've got some minor mods like longtubes, rockers, CAI, etc...
wow i never thought i would be agreeing with mr. ss but where is that retard smilie....
dangalla is offline  
Old 09-07-2007, 10:08 AM
  #42  
Registered User
 
neat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 221
Originally Posted by dangalla
wow i never thought i would be agreeing with mr. ss but where is that retard smilie....
I'm not sure, but I think you might of just called me a retard, lol.

I guess I could qualify/quantify my statement about gaining at least 10 RWHP, and 15 on average with a near stock LT1. I've probably done 100 or so tunes on stock-ish LT1 cars, and pretty much every time the cars pick up at least 10 RWHP. Sure there is the odd duck that won't pick up much, but 9 times out of 10, 10 RWHP is almost automatic with 15 being the average.

I'm not saying that any dyno tune from any company will pick up that much, that's just been my personal experience. I'm also not any kind of tuning guru or anything, the only real thing I have over most people is access to a dyno. The first 10-20 LT1 cars I tuned probably took me 20 pulls each to get dialed in to what I thought was maximum HP output. I can usually hit it in less than 10 pulls now, but it still takes more from time to time. It's also entirely possible that someone else could pick up more power than me. All I usually do when tuning for power on a stock-ish car is lean it out some, take the bumps out of the A/F ratio, add timing at various RPM's until I get KR, then back the timing off about 2 degrees from KR. I might go 3 or even 4 degrees back from KR if the power doesn't start to fall off, or the customer wants to put 87 octane in the car. Normally those changes add 10-15 RWHP, sometimes more, and very seldom they will add less or none at all.
neat is offline  
Old 09-07-2007, 02:19 PM
  #43  
Registered User
 
Z-RATED94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Carol Stream, Il.
Posts: 3,557
Originally Posted by dangalla
wow i never thought i would be agreeing with mr. ss but where is that retard smilie....
Nice! And what kind of tuning experience do you have? Do I totally agree with neats #s, of coarse not. I wasn't there to witness his results. Do I think he's way off base, no. And if you don't think a car with some mods can pick up between 10 to 20 HP with tuning, then yeah, you should be agreeing with the other guy.
Z-RATED94 is offline  
Old 09-07-2007, 02:58 PM
  #44  
Registered User
 
dangalla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: lakeville, pa
Posts: 2,092
Originally Posted by Z-RATED94
Do I think he's way off base, no. And if you don't think a car with some mods can pick up between 10 to 20 HP with tuning, then yeah, you should be agreeing with the other guy.
pay attention we were talking about a car with NO mods, of course tuning a car with mods for the mods is going to help slightly depending on what exactly you are talking about. but 5-10 is practically nothing and you can not rule out the fact that engine temp, iat, and many other slight factors could add up to your "10hp" gain

your the type of clown that hypertech makes its money off of doing the 160 thermo and "tune"
dangalla is offline  
Old 09-07-2007, 09:48 PM
  #45  
Registered User
 
Z-RATED94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Carol Stream, Il.
Posts: 3,557
Originally Posted by dangalla
pay attention we were talking about a car with NO mods, of course tuning a car with mods for the mods is going to help slightly depending on what exactly you are talking about. but 5-10 is practically nothing and you can not rule out the fact that engine temp, iat, and many other slight factors could add up to your "10hp" gain

your the type of clown that hypertech makes its money off of doing the 160 thermo and "tune"
I'm talking minor mods as was the oringial post. As far as tunes, my start up tune was from Ion, for the H/C swap, and was touched up by Speed Inc, after the swap from shorties to LTs. Hypertech, yeah I have one from back in the day when there was no tuning yet. Fans and thermo done, plus th speedo was adj. for the gears.
So i guess neat is lying, and I to am a retard. That's cool. Take care.
Z-RATED94 is offline  


Quick Reply: Am I down on power?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:29 PM.