awsome cc503 dyno today
Please tell me that this thread is a joke, and you're not trying to be serious.
06-24-2008, 08:46 PM
#34
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,800
I think there were problems with the run 360/402 at those rpms is not realistic numbers.
I have a graph that shows my old ZZ4 cam only setup making 509rwtq, doesn't mean it really made that.
Far as the guy who said a 503 is a "baby" cam, might want to get a clue, that is actually pretty close to the durations of what I am running, you do NOT want to go much bigger on a stock shortblock.
I have a graph that shows my old ZZ4 cam only setup making 509rwtq, doesn't mean it really made that.
Far as the guy who said a 503 is a "baby" cam, might want to get a clue, that is actually pretty close to the durations of what I am running, you do NOT want to go much bigger on a stock shortblock.
06-24-2008, 08:56 PM
#35
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Clovis, New Mexico
Posts: 439
^^^I agree! No way are those numbers realistic at those RPM's with a cam that size. Especially the fact that you were on a Mustang dyno and those are known to dyno lower than a Dynojet. IMO those sound like engine dyno numbers. As for my guess I'd say no more than 380rwhp.
06-24-2008, 09:09 PM
#36
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 106
i dynoed it three times and they were all consistent. and as far as not being able to make that kind of power out of that cam. LOL if you have done your homework such as i have!! you can make a cam like this make power like that!!! my heads really high really low(i spent over 100 hours on these particular heads getting them perfect for the cam specs of the 503) now if you dont beleive me thats one thing, but this is no joke we will see what it runs at the track. but i did race my buddys 04 cobra yesterday cia and exhaust (not exactly a 1/4 mile but i outran him by 1 car link) from a 10 roll although he did start to ketch up on the top end but neither of us spun!!! and i knoww the lay down 380 stock
06-24-2008, 09:19 PM
#37
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Oklahoma City, OK
Posts: 586
Yep, and it's even more ridiculous considering a stock tune & injectors on a mustang dyno. Also, combine that with his exhaust flow #s, hp/tq estimates, spelling/grammar, etc, etc….I figured it had to be a joke.
06-24-2008, 09:26 PM
#38
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Akron, OH
Posts: 391
whats rediculous is how you have to try and act like a douche?
06-24-2008, 09:41 PM
#39
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 106
thans DRE2013 i was thinking the same thing its not like i was not amazed my self it put out that much on a stock tune but it is what it is i mean i dont know what else to tell them it is possible cause it happend and as i siad it dynoed consistent evry time. ohh and LT4POWA i find it funny that you prolly have a good 4k in you heads N cam and from the looks of it im gonna have more horsepower and torque than you and ive got maybe 500 in mine LOL!!!
06-24-2008, 10:04 PM
#40
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Fort Worthless, Texas
Posts: 99
maybe he just dont be spellin all that good up in hurrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr.
06-24-2008, 11:12 PM
#41
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Daytona Beach, FL
Posts: 459
Don't feel bad, anytime anyone posts anything about making good power cheaply the people that paid others to make their cars fast get all jealous and start hating on them. My car is about identical to yours other than the tranny and I would never doubt those #'s cause thats about what I am seeing here. Mine's fake too, everyone knows you have to pay 5K$ to go over 400 HP. I think there are only like 2-3 big name cam/head combos that will do it too. Nevermind that one of them does it by porting stock castings just like you did and using a cam that isn't too far off from a cc503. Maybe you should sell that flowbench you just got and use the proceeds to get a couple thousand dollar set of heads, then send em out to get worked, then get a high dollar "custom" cam.
On a more serious note, what kind of work did you do to the intake?
On a more serious note, what kind of work did you do to the intake?
06-24-2008, 11:43 PM
#42
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 106
LOL hahaha Thank you LEARJET!!!LOL well said on the intake i did what everyone on here would call a level 3 le port job!!! but what i did diff. is after porting the intake i (polished it) for max. aif flow, except for where fuel runs i left alittle texture (because fuel runs faster with texture) and i also removed some material from the iac valve port(because it sticks out about a 1/4 of an inch in front of the throttle bores. but again like you said i prolly should have sent mine out to get less work done,and prolly have less benifits. [deleted]
Last edited by Injuneer; 06-25-2008 at 05:57 PM. Reason: Do not offer services unless you are a Supporting Vendor
06-25-2008, 02:18 AM
#44
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Cody,Wyoming 82414
Posts: 564
This thread is awesome....We all have been blessed with another self-proclaimed miracle head porter that can't spell or use grammar.
You sir are full of crap. If you are so keen with headwork/airflow why is it that you're running a flowmaster exhaust, that's like another 50hp to your already 420HP w/ the CC503. I bet you're cutting and pasting someone elses dyno right now. lol
This is pathetic...and I wash my hands of this insanity.
You sir are full of crap. If you are so keen with headwork/airflow why is it that you're running a flowmaster exhaust, that's like another 50hp to your already 420HP w/ the CC503. I bet you're cutting and pasting someone elses dyno right now. lol
This is pathetic...and I wash my hands of this insanity.
Last edited by Kaj; 06-25-2008 at 02:26 AM.
