LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

biggest, nastiest cam for stock heads

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-25-2007, 05:45 PM
  #46  
Registered User
 
SS MPSTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,525
Originally Posted by ABA383
I have had 2 cams in my motor in its 12 years of flawless performance...An LPE 211/219 and the Joe O. grind...While I have to credit LPE with an anvil of a short block, I've gotta think that only going to 6300 rpm has helped with durability, too...

--Alan
I believe it too, which is why my new cam is considerably smaller than the first grind. The car is likely going to be as fast or faster than it was, and hopefully have the durability & longevity your engine has.

Last edited by SS MPSTR; 01-25-2007 at 05:53 PM.
SS MPSTR is offline  
Old 01-25-2007, 06:43 PM
  #47  
Registered User
 
OldSStroker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 2,931
Originally Posted by Texas_96_Z
Ok so I have decided the next major mod will be cam and valvetrain. So my question is: What is the nastiest cam I can run with my stock (will be ported later) heads? This is a weekend car so I don't care about gas milage, ect. This will be a slow parts build up (married with kids). So LE1, 2, 3 or custom grinds are not feasible at the moment. Remember, I will port the heads later on down the road.

Thanks in advance for your replies.
It is possible to get a lot more from an LT1 without ever removng the heads, by just changing the valvetrain with the following considerations:

1) You'll need supporting mods like headers, free flowing exhaust, retuning and perhaps even different injectors, and a gear that will let you rev.

2) To get more torque and power from say 3500-6500 you'll have to sacrifice some below 3500, where you probably do much of your driving. You might want to limit revs to around 6500 on the stock shortblock.

3) Valve motion will be a lot more aggressive so you'll need better lifters, pushrods, rockers, springs, and retainers. This is over a grand in parts to accomplish this. If you didn't get all the right parts it won't work, nor will it work very long.

4) What could you expect for power increases? Perhaps 40-50 hp at peak and as much as 80 hp @ 64-6500. That's only going to help if you run the engine up there.

5) Here's an SAE Dynojet comparison of just what I've described. It's nearly 3 years old now, so there's probably a little more to be had today. Not everyone will believe this, but that's ok. You have to dot all the "i's" and cross all the "t's". IOW, you have to do everything right.

http://www.jonaadland.com/NewPics3/Camdynocomp6400.JPG

6) Would I advise you to spend well over $1000 plus installation/tuning/headers, etc. this way? Not really. I'd do the headers/exhaust, etc which you'll need anyway when you can do a head/cam package in the future and get more increase.

FWIW, I don't think this cam was all that "nasty". Rather it was pretty much what the engine needed to get where the owner wanted to go. Bigger ain't always better.

My $.02
OldSStroker is offline  
Old 01-26-2007, 11:14 AM
  #48  
Registered User
 
street demon2k3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: palmview, TX (RGV)
Posts: 676
Originally Posted by Texas_96_Z
Wouldn't the LE2 cam be a little too much for stock heads/bottom end?

Im running the LE2 cam on stock heads, but on a built bottom end. It pulls really hard all the way to 6200 RPM and the rev limiter is set to 6400rpm. I have no problems with it, but really good tuning is a must. I still need some bigger injectors(im on stock 19#'s), and maybe a fuel pump along with a dyno tune. It trapped 109 on 7 cylinders and a slipping trans shifting at 4k rpm, so im confident it will go high 11's@114mph+.

Best thing to do is talk to the cam grinder and go through the car's setup and individual goals for the car(DD, street/strip, max effort race car).

Id take OldSStroker's advice, cuz he hit it right on the nail. everyone has some good feedback as well.
street demon2k3 is offline  
Old 01-26-2007, 12:03 PM
  #49  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Texas_96_Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 182
And the winner is........CC306!

I would like to thank all the guys who helped me make an informed decision about camming my Z28. I'm sure I will have plenty more questions for you experts as I accumulate the needed parts.
Texas_96_Z is offline  
Old 01-26-2007, 02:03 PM
  #50  
Banned
 
mdacton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Goochland, Va.
Posts: 4,970
well tuning is the key....i'm sure you will like it
mdacton is offline  
Old 01-26-2007, 02:40 PM
  #51  
Registered User
 
chrism400's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 890
Originally Posted by Texas_96_Z
And the winner is........CC306!
Just make sure to use enough converter and gear to make it work. I had the 503 with 1.6's and used a 3800 Edge converter with a 4.56 gear and 28 inch tall tires. After some suspension work, I was running 11.70's @ 113 with 1.52 60 ft. times. I whipped on 306 guys all the time because they didn't use a combo that matched the higher powerband.
chrism400 is offline  
Old 01-26-2007, 09:50 PM
  #52  
Registered User
 
Z-RATED94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Carol Stream, Il.
Posts: 3,557
Better have at least a quality 3600 converter and a set of 3.73 gears to go with that choice of cam.
Z-RATED94 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
HectorM52
Parts For Sale
26
07-30-2017 11:46 AM
HectorM52
Parts Wanted
2
02-11-2015 09:33 AM
Killer94z
LT1 Based Engine Tech
3
01-13-2015 12:06 PM
birdblack
LS1 Based Engine Tech
7
12-30-2014 06:59 PM
Brian-94TA
Car Audio and Electronics
2
07-31-2002 02:52 PM



Quick Reply: biggest, nastiest cam for stock heads



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:42 PM.