LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Camshaft uproar! I'm playing with fire here.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-16-2004, 11:28 PM
  #46  
Registered User
 
1982z28with18s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Mission, Kansas
Posts: 1,743
My setup is Lloyd Elliot heads, Joe Overton custom grind (220/226) on stock bottem end. This is a really small cam but its what I wanted. Flow #'s are here....

http://memimage.cardomain.com/member...90_87_full.jpg


I've ran a best of 11.710 at 116.76 with a 1.65 60ft in 2350 DA at a track that doesn't do crap for prep. With some zero to 200 DA, a GOOD track, 52mm TB, EWP, 1.6 rr's my car has 11.3x's in it. Joe Overton basically helped me set up everything from the cam, gears, stall, tires, etc. My point is you dont need a BIG cam to perform great.
1982z28with18s is offline  
Old 06-17-2004, 02:19 AM
  #47  
Registered User
 
SS MPSTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,525
Originally posted by kamba93lt1
Sorry but really didn't want to read whole thread. I run a 355 with steel rods, and a stock crank. I have TEA ported heads and a comp cam custom grind.
Cam is 248/252 5**/5** 108 lobe sep.

car went 10.98 @ 120
Nice size cam, and it obviously works well with your heads and drivetrain. Congrats....that's hauling ***. Question: do you have any vacuum?
SS MPSTR is offline  
Old 06-17-2004, 02:35 AM
  #48  
West South Central Moderator
 
AdioSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Kilgore TX 75662
Posts: 3,372
I agree that bigger isn't always better, but I do find it interesting that Comp offers hydraulic roller cams with up to 262* duration @.050 with .420 LOBE lift. So, I guess that's as big as you can go

I'll be trying a few different cams in my little stroker on the engine dyno before finalizing my decision. Currently I'm at 230/236, 230/244, 236/248, and 242/248. I'm thinking about trying a smaller one with a really tight LSA just for the heck of it.
AdioSS is offline  
Old 06-17-2004, 06:25 AM
  #49  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
dmoss69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: North, SC, USA
Posts: 659
As far as lift goes, I don't think I need any more lift. I think that the lift is already there. What I'd like to do is move the RPM band up. This thing is a beast down low now with 342's, let alone with a set of 4.10's.

Not only that, but I can afford to loose some torque down low for HP up top, because during race day, I'm going to shoot N2 straight from the line, so I'll replace the tq that was there. I was thinking around 236/242 cam duration.

I'm not looking to make this an everyday driver again, just a weekend warrior. Maybe I just need to go from the XE grind down to the magnum series. Or GM847.

D Moss
dmoss69 is offline  
Old 06-17-2004, 07:21 AM
  #50  
Registered User
 
Mindgame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: In a house by the bay
Posts: 2,985
The Comp XR280R is a good off-the-shelf grind for max effort builds. It's streetable but probably not something the majority would want to live with in an every day driver. Bump the idle to 1100 and it'll make things easier for the 350 build. May want to check into that one.

-Mindgame
Mindgame is offline  
Old 06-17-2004, 07:46 AM
  #51  
Registered User
 
kamba93lt1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: In the Finals.
Posts: 55
Originally posted by SS MPSTR
Nice size cam, and it obviously works well with your heads and drivetrain. Congrats....that's hauling ***. Question: do you have any vacuum?
Don't really know. It is just a race car. I have always run manual brakes with this cam. I don't think it has much.

Thanks
Ken
kamba93lt1 is offline  
Old 06-17-2004, 10:58 AM
  #52  
Registered User
 
WS6T3RROR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Engineerland
Posts: 1,517
i give up trying to change your mind, but heres some advice from where i've been before. when you start climbing into durations much mast 240* its time to leave the hydrolic crap behind and go solid. and just because your heads peak at .XXX lift isnt a reason to stop when you find a cam with that lift. often times lifting past peak will make more power if you've ever degreed a cam you know that going past it increases the degrees where you're valve is at/past peak flow and that'll get more air in. part of the reason i'll give to justify that is what happens on your engine and what happens on the flow bench are two different things. on another note i believe you said you had 11:1 compression... probably shoulda gone higher with the type of cam you're looking to run. its a system not a pile of parts you throw together on a whim, it all needs to match.
WS6T3RROR is offline  
Old 06-17-2004, 11:34 AM
  #53  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
dmoss69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: North, SC, USA
Posts: 659
solid is not out of the question. I'll go solid roller.

As far as compression, I can go a little higher, but then I still want to be able to run pump gas. (of course the bleed off during overlap)

XR280R--I'll check into that one.

I just heard a sound clip of 236/242 and GM 847....they both were great.

D Moss
dmoss69 is offline  
Old 06-25-2004, 06:33 PM
  #54  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
dmoss69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: North, SC, USA
Posts: 659
I contacted comp cams with my flow numbers and this is what they recommend me to run. (I'll be getting hydrualic though)

Cam Spec Card Inquiry
PART NO. 12-678-4
01 INTAKE MASTER 6057
02 EXHAUST MASTER 6059
03 ENGINE CS XS282S-10
04 GRIND NUMBER CS XS282S-10
INT EXH
05 HYDRAULIC Y/N NO 14 DUR @.050 244 252
INTAKE EXHAUST 15 LOBE LIFT .3470 .3600
06 VALVE ADJUSTMENT .016 .016 16 ROCKER RATIO .00 .00
07 MAX GROSS VALVE LIFT .520 .540
08 DUR @ .015 TAPPET LIFT 282 290 17 LOBE SEPARATI 110.0
18 ADVANCE 4
09 VALVE TIMING OPEN CLOSE 19 VALVE SPRINGS 986-16
@ .015 10 INT 35 67
11 EXH 79 31 DATE SETUP / /
12 THESE SPECS ARE FOR CAM(S) INSTALLED
@ 106.0 INTAKE CENTERLINE

What do yall think?

D Moss
dmoss69 is offline  
Old 06-25-2004, 06:47 PM
  #55  
Registered User
 
Mindgame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: In a house by the bay
Posts: 2,985
It'll probably fit the criteria you've set down nicely. It should sound good.

At least they didn't try to calm it down with a wide lsa. Personally, I'd go with a cam that gives you similar overlap period on a shorter duration. That probably equates to something in the 236 range with a 108 lsa. Should be a stronger cam where it counts.

My opinion of course....

-Mindgame
Mindgame is offline  
Old 06-25-2004, 06:51 PM
  #56  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
dmoss69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: North, SC, USA
Posts: 659
Thanks mindgame.

Everyone! inputs welcome. I'm all ears.

D Moss
dmoss69 is offline  
Old 07-12-2004, 12:19 PM
  #57  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
dmoss69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: North, SC, USA
Posts: 659
Well,

I just purchased the GM 847.

I'll let everyone know what happens.

Thanks

D Moss
dmoss69 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KYWes
LT1 Based Engine Tech
8
06-14-2022 06:52 AM
whitehooptie
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
15
07-12-2015 06:10 PM
mrwz28
Cars For Sale
0
07-08-2015 09:11 PM
surreybrad
LT1 Based Engine Tech
2
07-05-2015 10:36 PM
jwade88
LT1 Based Engine Tech
16
06-14-2015 09:38 PM



Quick Reply: Camshaft uproar! I'm playing with fire here.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:29 AM.