LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Car dies in reverse and sometimes in drive

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-09-2006, 07:36 AM
  #16  
Guest
 
Guest47904's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 0
Ok now can you think back and remember just what was un-hooked and then rehooked back up when it was moved?

Can you clear up a little confusion regarding engine, PCM, speed density etc....

Based on your previous posts, you asked about using the 93 computer with a 94 engine.

What time is it in Bahrain?
Guest47904 is offline  
Old 11-09-2006, 07:47 AM
  #17  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Honda Hunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Bahrain
Posts: 2,271
Originally Posted by speedygonzales
Ok now can you think back and remember just what was un-hooked and then rehooked back up when it was moved?

Can you clear up a little confusion regarding engine, PCM, speed density etc....

Based on your previous posts, you asked about using the 93 computer with a 94 engine.

What time is it in Bahrain?
I didnt do the install but Ive gone over most of the stuff and hooked up whatever wasnt.

I asked about using a 93 ecm with a 94 engine because I was curious if any of the sensors were different but so far all the sensors are the same from what Ive learned. It's becoming really fustrating because I cant understand what I'm missing or what was overlooked. At this point I'm concentrating on the tranny region. Everything else seems to check out thusfar. The tranny is a stock 4l60 with a Yank 4000 stall from a C5. The speedo is way off due to a D44 swap with 3.54 gears. Ive noticed that the converter locks and unlocks based on tps and speed. Someone mentioned before the verter could be locking up or something. I havent ruled it out as of yet.
It's 1700 here in the Kingdom.

Last edited by Honda Hunter; 11-09-2006 at 07:50 AM.
Honda Hunter is offline  
Old 11-09-2006, 07:54 AM
  #18  
Guest
 
Guest47904's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 0
So it is the same PCM as was used when the engine was in the Camaro?

What about the tune? Was it changed when it was moved to the Vette?
Guest47904 is offline  
Old 11-09-2006, 07:59 AM
  #19  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Honda Hunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Bahrain
Posts: 2,271
Originally Posted by speedygonzales
So it is the same PCM as was used when the engine was in the Camaro?

What about the tune? Was it changed when it was moved to the Vette?
I'm using the 93 ecm with a tune from Alvin. Tune has been looked over and so far it doesnt seem to be the tune. I wanted to go to a 94 maf setup like was in my Camaro but it's very hard to change over in a 92-93 vette due to the CCM.
Honda Hunter is offline  
Old 11-09-2006, 09:16 AM
  #20  
Guest
 
Guest47904's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 0
Originally Posted by Honda Hunter
The same combo ran great in my Camaro. All we did was swap motors into my 93. Nothing has been right since then. Right now this is the biggest issue besides the stumbling/hesitation sometimes when driving at low rpm's.
Come on man. Are you kidding me. You put a different PCM tuned by whoever and removed the MAF. NOT exactly as you stated above, now is it.

You should put the original PCM and MAF on it temporarily to see if you can get back where you were. Then you know if is something else. ASSUMING you didn't change anything else you aren't telling us about. Save the TC.
Guest47904 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bfmv13trivium
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
9
01-14-2015 09:57 AM
nophix
Fuel and Ignition
3
11-30-2014 10:26 PM
Ricardo
Computer Diagnostics and Tuning
0
11-29-2014 10:58 AM
USAirman93
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
4
11-24-2014 03:37 PM
BIGCOWL-IMP
Midwest
0
11-21-2014 09:40 AM



Quick Reply: Car dies in reverse and sometimes in drive



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:34 PM.