LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Chime in - who's had a new stock LT1 timing set fail?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-29-2007, 11:03 AM
  #31  
Registered User
 
2QUIK6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Ft. Worth, TX
Posts: 1,937
There has to be a point where a stronger than stock timing setup is required. Its all going to come down to valve spring pressures for higher lift cams.
There's tons of responses indicating they used a stocker, but what is missing is their valve lift and spring pressures.

What is the limit for the stocker timing set???
With Comp 977 sprigs which have over 400# seat pressure, I'd think a stocker would be pushed past its limits there with .600+ lift.
2QUIK6 is offline  
Old 05-29-2007, 11:30 AM
  #32  
Registered User
 
Silvershark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Alaska
Posts: 1,435
I just purchased a motor setup from a friend who spun a rod bearing initially and then caused him to spin a main bearing and the motor seized. The timing chain didn't break. I think the stock piece is very good quality and can handle some decent abuse. I am going to see if I can get the block cleaned up and see if it is reusable.

Anyhow, I wouldnt think twice about using the stock timing chain.

I have two spares sitting in my garage.
Silvershark is offline  
Old 05-29-2007, 11:49 AM
  #33  
Registered User
 
Z-RATED94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Carol Stream, Il.
Posts: 3,557
Originally Posted by 2QUIK6
There has to be a point where a stronger than stock timing setup is required. Its all going to come down to valve spring pressures for higher lift cams.
There's tons of responses indicating they used a stocker, but what is missing is their valve lift and spring pressures.

What is the limit for the stocker timing set???
With Comp 977 sprigs which have over 400# seat pressure, I'd think a stocker would be pushed past its limits there with .600+ lift.
You have a good point. But for most of us the stocker seems to be a pretty good bet. I would replace the gears and chain though.
Z-RATED94 is offline  
Old 05-29-2007, 12:26 PM
  #34  
Registered User
 
turnin20s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 597
Originally Posted by 2QUIK6
There has to be a point where a stronger than stock timing setup is required. Its all going to come down to valve spring pressures for higher lift cams.
There's tons of responses indicating they used a stocker, but what is missing is their valve lift and spring pressures.

What is the limit for the stocker timing set???
With Comp 977 sprigs which have over 400# seat pressure, I'd think a stocker would be pushed past its limits there with .600+ lift.
+1 for me too. If you are still using close to stock valve springs and a smaller cam the stock pieces will probably do just fine, but once you get into the bigger cams and higher spring rates its probably a safe bet to just get a double roller or a stronger setup. You could continue to use the stock pieces and some people may not have any problems, but the chains do stretch alot after some time with a stock setup, so imagine what it would look like after some time on a modified valvetrain setup.
turnin20s is offline  
Old 05-29-2007, 12:56 PM
  #35  
Registered User
 
2QUIK6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Ft. Worth, TX
Posts: 1,937
Yeah, from my ealier post, just what are those stocker limits for lift and spring pressures?? anyone know?

I'll be doing a cam swap again soon and I'm just going to reserve judgement on what I'll use until I get the ED one out to inspect it.
Funny thing is the couple of failures that I saw pics of it was the cam gear wp teeth that were worn and not the wp gear itself....the ED set is supposed to be hardened, hence the reason to use the supplied wp gear...but the wear on the cam gear reflects just the opposite....
Also, as pointed out in one of the previously mentioned threads... Be certain that the wp you use that the shaft turns freely!! Several gear failures can be contributed to the Bosch replacement wps not having correct specs and the shaft could not be turned by hand..there was a recall from Bosch for this issue, but I'm sure most of those pumps still made it or are still on the shelves.
Its common to replace the wp while its off. I know 1 of the 2 I inspected at the auto store had a very tight shaft.
2QUIK6 is offline  
Old 05-29-2007, 06:04 PM
  #36  
Registered User
 
96capricemgr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,800
The WP is an 11hp load at 6000rpms using an electric would take that load off the timing set which would serve to make this already good piece last longer.

Far as spring pressures and lifts well I can't go too indepth there but I will say I am running 918s setup to about 140 on the seat so it isn't like the ZZ3 cam I used to run with 110 on the seat. I am not running anywhere near the .600 lift that some guys are though.
Was setup to a degree for endurance I want to be able to put 10K a year on it for a couple years before I worry about springs
96capricemgr is offline  
Old 05-29-2007, 06:22 PM
  #37  
Registered User
 
ABA383's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Littlestown, PA
Posts: 1,903
When LPE originally built my motor they used the stock timing set...When I had the heads freshened by Eric Bradby and installed a cam from Joe O. we just replaced the chain with another new stocker on Joe's and LPE's suggestion...and I thought Joe told me that he was running a stock timing set on his 9 second set up...I'd say thats a fairly good endorsement...

--Alan
ABA383 is offline  
Old 05-29-2007, 06:26 PM
  #38  
Banned
 
mdacton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Goochland, Va.
Posts: 4,970
Originally Posted by ABA383
When LPE originally built my motor they used the stock timing set...When I had the heads freshened by Eric Bradby and installed a cam from Joe O. we just replaced the chain with another new stocker on Joe's and LPE's suggestion...and I thought Joe told me that he was running a stock timing set on his 9 second set up...I'd say thats a fairly good endorsement...

--Alan
he had that extreme duty gmpp timing set.......Joe ran a stocker forever tho, I think he went 10.20's on motor with a stocker. Many people ran them for a long time, before everyone started running the double rollers
mdacton is offline  
Old 05-29-2007, 09:43 PM
  #39  
Registered User
 
neil350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: T E X A S
Posts: 2,665
Interesting topic, I have heard from a lot of people that the factory LT1 chain is a really good unit. Thats what I plan to use when I do a cam swap. Its always funny when you see these cars that run really well and you hear what parts are on them.
neil350 is offline  
Old 05-29-2007, 11:12 PM
  #40  
Registered User
 
kline454's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 420
yeah im running a stock replacement, with my car no problems went 11.30 before i just did some head work and added more n2o, changed the 1st one out a 140k still looked good.
kline454 is offline  
Old 05-30-2007, 08:41 AM
  #41  
Registered User
 
JoeliusZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Detroit
Posts: 2,926
Ill be running beehive springs when i do my cam swap and ill have a decent ammount of lift too (less than .6 though). I guess we shall see.
JoeliusZ28 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
oldschool
Parts For Sale
16
02-09-2016 09:21 PM
Catmaigne
Parts For Sale
4
12-25-2014 12:16 PM
Brandon Wittmer
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
3
12-03-2014 09:28 PM
siguy
Parts For Sale
3
11-27-2014 10:07 AM
BIGCOWL-IMP
Midwest
0
11-21-2014 09:40 AM



Quick Reply: Chime in - who's had a new stock LT1 timing set fail?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:38 PM.