LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Couple Stroker Questions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-03-2005, 07:44 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
93 4mula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Ocean Springs,MS
Posts: 585
Couple Stroker Questions

Im fixing to get around to building a 383 stroker. Which rods do yall recommend using the 6.0 or 5.7? Doesn't the block have to be clearanced for either one? If I use the 6.0 rods can I still use the stock oil pan? Im going to run the GM 847 with 1.6 rockers so what valve springs,retainers, locks, locators do I need to get?
93 4mula is offline  
Old 08-03-2005, 07:56 AM
  #2  
Registered User
 
Chris 96 WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 2,801
Re: Couple Stroker Questions

The block's going to have to be clearanced with either rod, because its the length of the crank throw that puts the rod bolts perilously close to the pan rails, not how long the rod is.
Chris 96 WS6 is offline  
Old 08-03-2005, 08:20 AM
  #3  
Administrator
 
Injuneer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
Posts: 70,825
Re: Couple Stroker Questions

If you're never planning on a power adder like a blower or nitrous, the 6.0's will be good. If you are looking at a power adder, now or in the future consider a 5.85" rod to give you a little more compression height on the piston.
Injuneer is offline  
Old 08-03-2005, 09:45 AM
  #4  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
93 4mula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Ocean Springs,MS
Posts: 585
Re: Couple Stroker Questions

Yea its just gonna be all motor. Im not worried about Nitrous or a blower. So the 6.0 rods are what Im looking for then. Can I run the stock oil pan or do yall recommend getting an aftermarket? What about the springs etc?
93 4mula is offline  
Old 08-04-2005, 01:37 AM
  #5  
Registered User
 
96ta(nick)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Mustang OK
Posts: 644
Re: Couple Stroker Questions

Originally Posted by Injuneer
If you're never planning on a power adder like a blower or nitrous, the 6.0's will be good. If you are looking at a power adder, now or in the future consider a 5.85" rod to give you a little more compression height on the piston.
I am looking at spraying 200hp worth of nitrous on mine do you think i should use 6.00 or 5.85" rods?
96ta(nick) is offline  
Old 08-04-2005, 07:03 AM
  #6  
Moderator
 
rskrause's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Buffalo, New York
Posts: 10,745
Re: Couple Stroker Questions

I know people hate to hear this, but wrt rod length you really should do a search. The people who know much about this have already posted their opinions and (Fred excepted) are unlikely to want to do so again. I will say that more is made of this than it deserves. With the exception of the CH issue Fred mentioned, within the range we are talking about it probably doesn't matter.

Rich
rskrause is offline  
Old 08-04-2005, 08:36 AM
  #7  
Administrator
 
Injuneer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
Posts: 70,825
Re: Couple Stroker Questions

Good point... it really doesn't matter all that much on an NA setup. More energy has been wasted debating the real benefits of rod/stroke ratio than it deserves for anything but an all out, purpose-specific racing engine. But the compression height is an issue that needs to be addressed.

There are some posts regarding this on "Advanced Tech", if you want to take a look (= "search").
Injuneer is offline  
Old 08-04-2005, 08:43 PM
  #8  
Registered User
 
NVetro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,439
Re: Couple Stroker Questions

I did a search on this before i went and built my 383 stroker motor. I was going to go with the 6" rods that all those kits come with but decided to "build it once" and do it right the first time. I went with 5.7" Callies Compstar rods. I was reading, and several people said this, on a N/A motor you wont even be able to know the diffrence. But for example on a nitroud motor, the 6" rod will actually keep the piston at TDC for a longer period of time then the 5.7". I belive, and please search to confirm what I am saying, if the piston is at TDC longer espeically when your running n2o you have a greater chance of detonation. Agian please search to confirm my statement.
NVetro is offline  
Old 08-04-2005, 11:07 PM
  #9  
Registered User
 
93black-ta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: savannah ga
Posts: 303
Re: Couple Stroker Questions

my only advise is, before you start your buildup take your estimated cost and multiply it by 2. if you dont have that kind of change laying around go with the 355, rebuild your your engine with stock compnents wherever possible, , make more power with the same money putting it into heads and cam.
i should have went with a 355. i would have been done by now.
most of the stock components are good to most of our hp goals.
93black-ta is offline  
Old 08-05-2005, 08:33 AM
  #10  
Administrator
 
Injuneer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
Posts: 70,825
Re: Couple Stroker Questions

I don't think the issue with nitrous is so much the dwell time at TDC, its the fact that the longer the rod gets, the thinner the piston top gets, the farther up on the side the wrist pin sits, and when you drop the ring pack to get it away from the intense heat of the nitrous combustion, you end up with the wrist pin in the ring pack. You need more compression height to allow you to strengthen the top of the piston, and move the rings down a bit. Even with 5.85" rods on a 3.75" stroke, I'm running rail spacers, because the oil ring is in the wrist pin.
Injuneer is offline  
Old 08-05-2005, 10:30 AM
  #11  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
93 4mula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Ocean Springs,MS
Posts: 585
Re: Couple Stroker Questions

Would I be fine with 5.7 rods if I wanted to add nitrous to it?
93 4mula is offline  
Old 08-05-2005, 10:35 AM
  #12  
Registered User
 
WS Sick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Oklahoma where trees are made of wood.
Posts: 2,725
Re: Couple Stroker Questions

Yes you would be fine. They make thick crown 6.0 pistons , but the second and oil ring have supports that hold them in place through the pin bore on the piston, just something more to come loose and worry about IMO.

I have 5.7s in mine and N/A it will rev almost as high as you want it to.
WS Sick is offline  
Old 08-05-2005, 11:50 AM
  #13  
Registered User
 
JustNO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,025
Re: Couple Stroker Questions

There are 900-1000rwhp Turbo LT1s with 6.0 rods.. I don't think there will be a problem if you use 6.0 rods with forced induction or nitrous setup..
JustNO is offline  
Old 08-05-2005, 05:00 PM
  #14  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
93 4mula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Ocean Springs,MS
Posts: 585
Re: Couple Stroker Questions

Yea I just need to know which rod would be better to run the 5.7 or the 6.0 while running juice. Which would last longer and not have to worry bout detonation

Last edited by 93 4mula; 08-05-2005 at 05:20 PM.
93 4mula is offline  
Old 08-05-2005, 05:48 PM
  #15  
Registered User
 
NVetro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,439
Re: Couple Stroker Questions

I also agree with Injuneer on his statement. In theory wound't a 5.7" rod be abit stronger then a 6.0" rod? Curious about that if they were the same type and same material.
NVetro is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dbusch22
Forced Induction
6
10-31-2016 11:09 AM
RUENUF
Cars For Sale
1
05-25-2016 08:10 PM
RUENUF
South Atlantic
4
03-13-2016 03:39 PM
ChrisFrez
CamaroZ28.Com Podcast
0
01-04-2015 08:43 AM
squirrels
Site Help and Suggestions
4
07-13-2002 01:58 AM



Quick Reply: Couple Stroker Questions



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:10 PM.