LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Cylinder Head misconceptions . . .

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-25-2005, 06:45 PM
  #31  
Registered User
 
AiSr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Winners Circle, NC
Posts: 26
Re: Cylinder Head misconceptions . . .

Originally Posted by NightTrain66
After calling a "competitor" and gearing a bunch of nonsense, I figured that I would set the record strait. These are the same people that want people to believe "we could work for NASCAR but we like working for less $$$ and dealing with the street crowd" LOL.

Lloyd
Since we are located in Concord, NC, the heart of NASCAR country, I guess you are referring to us. Lloyd, I am very surprised and flattered that you would actually call in an attempt to learn what makes our cars run so well on the track and street. If you had told us who you were we might have given you some tips on charge motion and wet flow analysis. In the future, if you are going to quote us, have the courtesy to do it accurately. We have not, nor do not, tell potential customers "we could work for NASCAR but we like working for less $$$ and dealing with the street crowd". However, what we do relate to potential customers, if the subject comes up, is that we were taught port development (not just how to make "flow bench racing ports" quickly & cheaply) by working with shops that do compete at this level. Key words in our name for potential customers is " Advanced & Development". The people we are priviledged to work with actually build racing engines not virtual engines that only seem to exist on Z28 & LS1 Tech or "The Matrix".

You quoted us fairly accurately on some of "the bunch of nonsense" points. However you forgot to add what we said concerning peak dyno#'s.

Originally Posted by NightTrain66
The first thing that people ask is "what can you get them to flow?". This is a VERY confusing question for a few reasons.

1- flow #'s are NOT AS IMPORTANT as runner shape and measurements in key areas of the port.
2- most people inflate or lie about #'s since that is what most customers wanna see.
3- it will vary depending on what valvce size we are using and what the port NEEDS to be shaped like.
4- more CFM on a flow bench at 28" of depression will not always make more power. The engine will have the air traveling MUCH faster than this and find alot of problems with the port that a 28" flow test will not show. Flow testing at a higher depression and LOOKING for problems is a better way to design a port, even if this means shaping the port different so that it flows LESS at 28" of depression.
We will be attending the PRI in Orlando next week and would welcome any past or potential customers to give us a call to personally meet and address any of your questions or concerns.

Ron
AiSr is offline  
Old 11-25-2005, 07:06 PM
  #32  
Banned
 
1racerdude's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: LA (lower Alabama)
Posts: 6,661
Re: Cylinder Head misconceptions . . .

Originally Posted by IllusionalTA
I spent about a hour on the phone w/ dennis and airflow development in regard's to my RR 245 All pro's that are going on my 396... he stressed the port shape is going to be critical to get me what i want out of my head.. I am by no mean's building a budget head and probably would have been better off to go w/ a 15 deg setup.... I like post's like this that talk about the dynamic's of head porting.. good info..

STICKY THIS!!!

Let All Pro port the heads. They do their heads all the time for the dirt track sprint cars with a 410CID limit and they flow ungodly. They ain't cheap but they seem to be real good at making power.
1racerdude is offline  
Old 11-25-2005, 07:29 PM
  #33  
Registered User
 
stonebreaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Falls Church, VA
Posts: 26
Re: Cylinder Head misconceptions . . .

Originally Posted by SStrokerAce
I would imagine that the lower the Reynolds number the better since what we are really looking for is the most Laminar flow in the ports.

Bret
In this case, I'm referring to the specific Reynolds number at which the port flow goes turbulent, so in this case, the higher the critical Reynolds number, the better.

I see what you're saying about the smaller port being more likely to have better fuel atomization. Didn't think about that one - good point.
stonebreaker is offline  
Old 11-25-2005, 07:30 PM
  #34  
Banned
 
SStrokerAce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,518
Re: Cylinder Head misconceptions . . .

Larry, if I had the choice between Dennis and All Pro, I'd let Dennis. Dennis does a ton of sprint car stuff (hell he's located right in the middle of PA sprint car territory) and All Pro's shallow angle stuff ain't what he uses. More like a Brodix.

Bret
SStrokerAce is offline  
Old 11-25-2005, 07:38 PM
  #35  
Banned
 
1racerdude's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: LA (lower Alabama)
Posts: 6,661
Re: Cylinder Head misconceptions . . .

Originally Posted by SStrokerAce
Larry, if I had the choice between Dennis and All Pro, I'd let Dennis. Dennis does a ton of sprint car stuff (hell he's located right in the middle of PA sprint car territory) and All Pro's shallow angle stuff ain't what he uses. More like a Brodix.

Bret
If he is any better than All Pro he's got it going on.

We used to race up there in the '60-'70's. Raced at every Grove up there. Lived in Harrisberg for 5 month's of the year and did it for 4 seasons.. That's back when Greg Weld,Opperman,Allen,and the Kinser clan and a bunch of others were running up there.

Last edited by 1racerdude; 11-25-2005 at 07:45 PM.
1racerdude is offline  
Old 11-25-2005, 08:08 PM
  #36  
Registered User
 
IllusionalTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Long Island, NY ; Norfolk, VA
Posts: 1,542
Re: Cylinder Head misconceptions . . .

Originally Posted by 1racerdude
If he is any better than All Pro he's got it going on.

We used to race up there in the '60-'70's. Raced at every Grove up there. Lived in Harrisberg for 5 month's of the year and did it for 4 seasons.. That's back when Greg Weld,Opperman,Allen,and the Kinser clan and a bunch of others were running up there.
reason why i'm having dennis do the heads is get the port where i need it to be. for what i'm using the head on my car for.. Roundy round stuff tend's to be a tight rpm range i.e 7500-8500 or even higher.. I'm looking for more room than that.. and a all pro port will give me great roundy round performance, but dennis feel's he can get the head to where we need it to be for what i need... Even all pro agree's that they're cnc port wouldn't be optimal for what i wanna do.. but the casting is a kick *** starting point.. Just like i said.. it's not the most common setup..
IllusionalTA is offline  
Old 11-25-2005, 08:11 PM
  #37  
Registered User
 
Jeff95TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 341
Re: Cylinder Head misconceptions . . .

Do any companies do CFD (computational fluid dynamics) analysis on heads? I would think it would be cost prohibitive for anyone except maybe very high end companies (like racing teams with corporate sponsorship). My company does CFD and it is not cheap for the software or the hardware.
Jeff95TA is offline  
Old 11-25-2005, 08:25 PM
  #38  
Banned
 
1racerdude's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: LA (lower Alabama)
Posts: 6,661
Re: Cylinder Head misconceptions . . .

Originally Posted by IllusionalTA
reason why i'm having dennis do the heads is get the port where i need it to be. for what i'm using the head on my car for.. Roundy round stuff tend's to be a tight rpm range i.e 7500-8500 or even higher.. I'm looking for more room than that.. and a all pro port will give me great roundy round performance, but dennis feel's he can get the head to where we need it to be for what i need... Even all pro agree's that they're cnc port wouldn't be optimal for what i wanna do.. but the casting is a kick *** starting point.. Just like i said.. it's not the most common setup..

The RPM range is about 4-8000,if it's handling if not ya get lower than 4000. Sometimes on a dry slick ya got to gear to where it's not loose all the time,like go off in the corner and park it till it stops sliding and ya can get down 2500 or so,but that ain't going for max power.
Just thought All Pro would be the ones but obviously not.
I have run there stuff in drag cars and it does OK for me but glad to know there is better work to be had.
1racerdude is offline  
Old 11-26-2005, 09:18 AM
  #39  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
NightTrain66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Red Oak Texas
Posts: 1,509
Re: Cylinder Head misconceptions . . .

Ron,

I guess the quote marks were a lil confusing. I did not say that you used these words, I said that you would like people to believe this is true.

I was equally flattered when Ai started offering $1100 and $1600 head and cam packages. Add some bee hive springs and Ferrea 6000 series valves to these heads and the price goes up a bit but I am sure it would be hard to sell them at a lower price and make any profit at all.

Do you not agree with the 4 points that are made in my original post? I think more people needed to know these things and give them a better understanding of why you can't compare heads by looking at flow #'s.

Unfortunately I do not pick my customers and I just get them set up with what will work best for them. If a customer has $1400 for heads and cam and is wanting to run a high 11 with his full weight 6 speed car, 1 3/4 headers, etc, and still be VERY drivable, we can use a mild 230 duration cam and do that like Kryckters. If a customer was to come to me with a 500 lb lighter car, A3, big stall, DFI set up, BIG headers, etc and wanted to run a lil faster, I can get him set up with something a lil more aggressive.

As far as any airflow qiuestions I have or looking for "tips", I will just stick with asking Trevor Johnson or Dennis @ Air Flow Development. They seem to be thinking along the same lines as I do. I appreciate the offer though, LOL.

Lloyd Elliott
972-617-5671
Eportworks.com

Last edited by NightTrain66; 11-26-2005 at 10:17 AM.
NightTrain66 is offline  
Old 11-26-2005, 10:06 AM
  #40  
Registered User
 
Honda Hunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Bahrain
Posts: 2,271
Re: Cylinder Head misconceptions . . .

Great thread. Thanks everyone for coming in and sharing some great knowledge.
Honda Hunter is offline  
Old 11-26-2005, 06:47 PM
  #41  
Registered User
 
IllusionalTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Long Island, NY ; Norfolk, VA
Posts: 1,542
Re: Cylinder Head misconceptions . . .

Originally Posted by NightTrain66
As far Dennis @ Air Flow Development. They seem to be thinking along the same lines as I do. I appreciate the offer though, LOL.
IllusionalTA is offline  
Old 11-26-2005, 09:55 PM
  #42  
Registered User
 
Z95m6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: newton, kansas, USA
Posts: 6,070
Re: Cylinder Head misconceptions . . .

It's nice to see a sponsor making a post in the tech section just to promote his own product and then bash another fellow sponsor at the same time.
Z95m6 is offline  
Old 11-26-2005, 10:03 PM
  #43  
Banned
 
1racerdude's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: LA (lower Alabama)
Posts: 6,661
Re: Cylinder Head misconceptions . . .

The bashing seems to be rather equal, if ya read the posts.
1racerdude is offline  
Old 11-26-2005, 10:11 PM
  #44  
Registered User
 
Z95m6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: newton, kansas, USA
Posts: 6,070
Re: Cylinder Head misconceptions . . .

Originally Posted by 1racerdude
The bashing seems to be rather equal, if ya read the posts.

Unless i missed it or Ai deleted a post Lloyd started the bashing. I don't see this thread as one aimed at helping people as it is for promoting his own product and bashing another. I see you, Bret and many others tried to turn it into a worthy thread though.
Z95m6 is offline  
Old 11-26-2005, 10:22 PM
  #45  
Banned
 
1racerdude's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: LA (lower Alabama)
Posts: 6,661
Re: Cylinder Head misconceptions . . .

Originally Posted by Z95m6
Unless i missed it or Ai deleted a post Lloyd started the bashing. I don't see this thread as one aimed at helping people as it is for promoting his own product and bashing another. I see you, Bret and many others tried to turn it into a worthy thread though.
Don't know if anybody is turning anything into anything.
LLoyd started a thread and AI came on and started gouging is the way I see it. Prior to that they hadn't been mentioned.
It doesn't matter to me if they have a knock down drag out.
It's BETWEEN THEM and nobody else.
I don't support either,but it appears like mighty good info to me.
1racerdude is offline  


Quick Reply: Cylinder Head misconceptions . . .



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:05 PM.