Dyno results!!
03-05-2003, 02:05 PM
#17
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Chicagoland Area
Posts: 560
Originally posted by Blk94Z28LT1
well, not sure about the loudmouth, but the tb bypass is good for 5 to 7hp, the underdrive pulley maybe 1hp, LT4KM, not sure maybe 5 to 10hp depending on the car, 160 stat, again not sure, let's say 5hp and the hypertech, well that's really a hot subject, but lets say 10hp. So on the low end maybe 26hp total, which would put you two pretty close. Just my 2cents.
well, not sure about the loudmouth, but the tb bypass is good for 5 to 7hp, the underdrive pulley maybe 1hp, LT4KM, not sure maybe 5 to 10hp depending on the car, 160 stat, again not sure, let's say 5hp and the hypertech, well that's really a hot subject, but lets say 10hp. So on the low end maybe 26hp total, which would put you two pretty close. Just my 2cents.
But I am very impressed with your numbers. Sounds like you have a healthy running LT1.
03-05-2003, 02:34 PM
#19
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Va
Posts: 174
Originally posted by LimitedEd1LE
Those numbers for those mods do not line up at all. Don't do the ricer math for calculating hp. The hypertech, 160 thermostat, and LT4KM will give u maybe 3 hp max. The only mod that is getting him HP is the loudmouth. The pullies suck, and the TB bypass maybe gives him a few ponies.
But I am very impressed with your numbers. Sounds like you have a healthy running LT1.
Those numbers for those mods do not line up at all. Don't do the ricer math for calculating hp. The hypertech, 160 thermostat, and LT4KM will give u maybe 3 hp max. The only mod that is getting him HP is the loudmouth. The pullies suck, and the TB bypass maybe gives him a few ponies.
But I am very impressed with your numbers. Sounds like you have a healthy running LT1.
03-05-2003, 03:42 PM
#20
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Scottsdale AZ
Posts: 729
man a 160 stat and a fan switch are priceless havent dynoed my car but they have helped tramendously in staying consistent with mph at the track which used to drop about 2 mph with each consecutive run now its pretty close that means im not loseing power due to heat soke
bye the way those are some good #
but if you like those saw a graph from a 96 ws6 that put down 306 hp and 330 tq at the wheels with nothing more than a cutout and a k/n through manifolds and no cam
bye the way those are some good #
but if you like those saw a graph from a 96 ws6 that put down 306 hp and 330 tq at the wheels with nothing more than a cutout and a k/n through manifolds and no cam
03-05-2003, 03:52 PM
#21
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,132
Originally posted by IDOXLR8
Actually those are pretty impressive number for the mods you have.
Actually those are pretty impressive number for the mods you have.
Those are pretty good number for what you have done, throw in a good set of headers, a good y-pipe with high flow cats and you will be set....
03-05-2003, 04:06 PM
#23
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: T E X A S
Posts: 2,665
If you think those numbers are bad, your smoking crack. Those are some damn good numbers for a car that still has stock exhaust manifolds, that LM is worth 10hp at the wheels max. That car is putting down some good numbers, very impresivemundo my friend.
Dont be mad cause you got the day after Christmass car 
Mines was built in Febuary, the interior sticker says the 11th so I'm sure the guy got dumped by his wife of 30 years right around Valentines day or was going through a nasty divorce.
Originally posted by NiteRider
It's just a very healthy LT1, must be a wednesday built.
It's just a very healthy LT1, must be a wednesday built.
Mines was built in Febuary, the interior sticker says the 11th so I'm sure the guy got dumped by his wife of 30 years right around Valentines day or was going through a nasty divorce.
Last edited by neil350; 03-05-2003 at 04:10 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tdigger9899
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
9
09-07-2015 10:56 AM