finally dynoed my T/A
07-10-2007, 06:04 PM
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: chitown burbs
Posts: 1,349
finally dynoed my T/A
i took it to FLP (Finish Line Performance) in Naperville to be tune by Dan Bills, he really knows his stuff. anyways, i have mods in sig.
car did 326 RWHP and 342 FT lb TQ with a ballin *** torque curve or i mean, what curve.hehe.
it was without nitrous of coarse and the A/F was dead ***** on perfect after some adjusting. it was pouring rain on the drivehome so i couldnt really "feel" a difference in the tune but its good to know ill be just shy of 450 horse with a 125 shot.
temp was 94 degrees and numbers are not SAE corrected.
what you guys think for a bolt on LT1 with a 224/224 cam?
car did 326 RWHP and 342 FT lb TQ with a ballin *** torque curve or i mean, what curve.hehe.
it was without nitrous of coarse and the A/F was dead ***** on perfect after some adjusting. it was pouring rain on the drivehome so i couldnt really "feel" a difference in the tune but its good to know ill be just shy of 450 horse with a 125 shot.
temp was 94 degrees and numbers are not SAE corrected.
what you guys think for a bolt on LT1 with a 224/224 cam?
07-11-2007, 05:27 PM
#3
Administrator
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
Posts: 70,825
Why would they not "correct" the numbers either to STD or SAE? They short-changed you. Without the correction, you've got to account not only for the air temp, but the barometric pressure, and the humidity.
07-12-2007, 08:21 AM
#5
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: chitown burbs
Posts: 1,349
alright i took a second look at the dyno chart and i dont understand some of it(go figure). they never said anything about correcting it, they gave me the chart and i discussed the a/f and timing with them a bit, but thats all.
heres all it says:
it says on the top right...
CF: SAE Smoothing: 5
and then on the bottom is has...
94.28* F, 29.17 in-Hg, Humidity: 28%, SAE: 1.04
heres all it says:
it says on the top right...
CF: SAE Smoothing: 5
and then on the bottom is has...
94.28* F, 29.17 in-Hg, Humidity: 28%, SAE: 1.04
07-12-2007, 08:50 AM
#7
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Bridgewater, MA
Posts: 5,645
Not bad... I would expect atleast 335rwhp out of it, but not too bad.
BTW, I am putting a 224/224 cam in my 383 LTX.... oh, did I mention I need to pas emissions and I will be running a T88 turbo
I am actually planning on breaking in the motor first without the turbo setup, so I will get #'s N/a first (depsite the 8.5:1 CR). I would think I could hit 370-380rwhp.
BTW, I am putting a 224/224 cam in my 383 LTX.... oh, did I mention I need to pas emissions and I will be running a T88 turbo
I am actually planning on breaking in the motor first without the turbo setup, so I will get #'s N/a first (depsite the 8.5:1 CR). I would think I could hit 370-380rwhp.
07-12-2007, 03:03 PM
#9
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: chitown burbs
Posts: 1,349
i got it used real cheap and it was nearly brand new, also i dont need to rev it very much to get good power out of it, it has a nice idle, nice drivability, the car is my daily driver and i have nitrous as well, so i thought the baby cam would be a good choice.
as far as the grind, its a custom comp grind, im not sure why the guy i bought it from had those specs done, but i must say it has a nice idle and deffinitley an awesome range for street driving. also, this cam made me go from 14.2 to 13.3, although i couldnt hook up either time, so a 12.7-12.9 shoudl be doable i beleive with just this cam.
as far as the grind, its a custom comp grind, im not sure why the guy i bought it from had those specs done, but i must say it has a nice idle and deffinitley an awesome range for street driving. also, this cam made me go from 14.2 to 13.3, although i couldnt hook up either time, so a 12.7-12.9 shoudl be doable i beleive with just this cam.
07-14-2007, 04:29 PM
#14
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Saginaw, Michigan
Posts: 3,620
