LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Finally!..My cam specs are in!...BUT, is this too big?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-19-2006, 05:01 PM
  #46  
Registered User
 
JustNO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,025
Re: Finally!..My cam specs are in!...BUT, is this too big?

Originally Posted by Denny McLain

Also it was a solid roller and broke a lifter after only about a months worth of street use. Cost me another engine.
You broke lifters and cost you another engine?
JustNO is offline  
Old 08-19-2006, 05:33 PM
  #47  
Registered User
 
MEAN LT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Jacksonville,fla
Posts: 1,983
Re: Finally!..My cam specs are in!...BUT, is this too big?

Originally Posted by JustNO
You broke lifters and cost you another engine?

I hate hearing stuff like this. Just when Im excited about go SR here comes stuff liek this.

Denny Please explain what happened.
MEAN LT1 is offline  
Old 08-19-2006, 05:35 PM
  #48  
Registered User
 
speed_demon24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Ocala, Florida
Posts: 3,245
Re: Finally!..My cam specs are in!...BUT, is this too big?

Solid roller does not mean less reliability. Changes are you had cheap or defective lifters that weren't up to the job. Solid roller just requires more maitinence, but it has more potential for power. Your setup could have been mismatched too, or not had the heads/intake to support that huge cam.

Originally Posted by Denny McLain
Tried running a 254/262 cam with .650/.670 lift on the street and it was horrible. First, it didn't make any more power than a smaller one I had prior and second it even bucked while driving down the hwy. Not recommended!!

Also it was a solid roller and broke a lifter after only about a months worth of street use. Cost me another engine. Hydraulics may make less power, but I've not had problem one since going from solids to hydraulic and I'm making OK power.......plus sleeping at night cause it ain't broke.

On top of that, I'd like to see some verifible information that equal duration solid rollers make more power than hydrualics with the newer lifters like the Morels. So far no one has proved it to me.
speed_demon24 is offline  
Old 08-19-2006, 05:51 PM
  #49  
Registered User
 
JustNO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,025
Re: Finally!..My cam specs are in!...BUT, is this too big?

Originally Posted by MEAN LT1
I hate hearing stuff like this. Just when Im excited about go SR here comes stuff liek this.
Exactly!!!
It shouldn't be that easy!
JustNO is offline  
Old 08-19-2006, 06:07 PM
  #50  
Moderator
 
rskrause's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Buffalo, New York
Posts: 10,745
Re: Finally!..My cam specs are in!...BUT, is this too big?

Lifter breakage is not uncommon in an engine with an aggressive cam. We just found a cracked one last week in my buddies 5.0 stroker race motor on a routine teardown. Easily could have cost the whole motor if it let go. When people talk about some of this technology not being suitable for typical street use, they are NOT kidding.

A little elaboration: street use can be harder on parts than race use. Even a mild drag race engine will get pulled apart and inspected/freshened up after say 100 runs. That's about 15-<20 minutes (for a 10 second car) of high rpm/wide open throttle (passes plus burnout) and maybe another couple of hours total run time which is under very easy conditions (driving around the pits, return road, etc.). You could easily equal the high load/rpm portion in a year of driving with hundreds of times the amount of less demanding use. And on the street, a motor is more likely to be abused - operating under high load when too cold, too hot, in the wrong gear, etc.

This is one reason why I stick to ~0.600" valve lift for a street small block motor. The bigger lobes are quite aggressive, require big spring pressures, etc. and the whole thing is just not going to stand up to street use. And then people will try to cheap out on springs. There are some newer springs that are going to be more likely to live for the number of cycles a street machine sees, but they are quite expensive. In the $400 range. And a set of top quality roller lifters is going to be in the $1,000 range. And so on. And even these parts are simply not designed for street use. Though they may have a bit more margin than the usual sportsman race parts.

Rich

Last edited by rskrause; 08-19-2006 at 06:25 PM.
rskrause is offline  
Old 08-19-2006, 06:33 PM
  #51  
Registered User
 
ABA383's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Littlestown, PA
Posts: 1,903
Re: Finally!..My cam specs are in!...BUT, is this too big?

Bigger is not always better...especially for a street car/DD even if it is a SR cam...Just be careful...and hope you only have to drive 1 mile to work, and have real understanding neighbors, and don't have to be at work until noonish..

...and I was stressing over a change from my 22X/23X to a 23X/24X...

--Alan
ABA383 is offline  
Old 08-19-2006, 06:36 PM
  #52  
Banned
 
1racerdude's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: LA (lower Alabama)
Posts: 6,661
Re: Finally!..My cam specs are in!...BUT, is this too big?

Get Isky "Red Zone" or Crower "HIPPO" lifters and don't let it idle a bunch. That's why I got Schebeck lifters for $1000 dollars.
1racerdude is offline  
Old 08-19-2006, 09:02 PM
  #53  
Registered User
 
Fastbird93's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Waynesboro, PA
Posts: 4,827
Re: Finally!!! I got my new cam specs...BUT is this too big?

Originally Posted by Javier97Z28
That's a big ****in' cam.
My sentiments exactly. That sure as heck ain't no street friendly bumpstick, that's for sure.
Fastbird93 is offline  
Old 08-20-2006, 08:14 AM
  #54  
Registered User
 
MEAN LT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Jacksonville,fla
Posts: 1,983
Re: Finally!..My cam specs are in!...BUT, is this too big?

Originally Posted by 1racerdude
Get Isky "Red Zone" or Crower "HIPPO" lifters and don't let it idle a bunch. That's why I got Schebeck lifters for $1000 dollars.
Wow, I didnt know there was such a thing as $1000
lifters. Are they lined with gold?.
MEAN LT1 is offline  
Old 08-20-2006, 08:41 AM
  #55  
Banned
 
1racerdude's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: LA (lower Alabama)
Posts: 6,661
Re: Finally!..My cam specs are in!...BUT, is this too big?

Originally Posted by MEAN LT1
Wow, I didnt know there was such a thing as $1000
lifters. Are they lined with gold?.
Just silver.
Jesel's are $2500.00.
1racerdude is offline  
Old 08-20-2006, 09:36 AM
  #56  
Moderator
 
rskrause's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Buffalo, New York
Posts: 10,745
Re: Finally!..My cam specs are in!...BUT, is this too big?

Originally Posted by MEAN LT1
Wow, I didnt know there was such a thing as $1000
lifters. Are they lined with gold?.
And the people who use them don't spend the money for nothing. Though the Crower severe duty is only ~$600. That's what I use. The lifter that broke on my buddys 5.0 was an ISKY, which runs $600+ as well. We are debating what to upgrade to. We may just go with another set of ISKY's and do a more rigorous maintainence program. Something like a 25 run inspection cycle. This illustrates why very aggressive valve trains are not suited for street use, in case you haven't figured that out yet.

We don't know the lobe profile on the cam under discussion, but I suspect it would need very good supporting parts to have much longevity.

Rich
rskrause is offline  
Old 08-20-2006, 09:40 AM
  #57  
Registered User
 
JustNO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,025
Re: Finally!..My cam specs are in!...BUT, is this too big?

Originally Posted by 1racerdude
Just silver.
Jesel's are $2500.00.
For which setups are you talking about? I tought the Morels are the best and most expensive.
JustNO is offline  
Old 08-20-2006, 09:43 AM
  #58  
Banned
 
1racerdude's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: LA (lower Alabama)
Posts: 6,661
Re: Finally!..My cam specs are in!...BUT, is this too big?

Originally Posted by JustNO
For which setups are you talking about? I tought the Morels are the best and most expensive.
Mech roller.
OH no Morel isn't the most expensive. Look around and ya will see.

Get a cam ground with "soft" ramps and ya will be ok with the Crower or Isky rollers.
Call Crower and talk to Dave He will get ya fixed up with the size and profile ya need to do it right.

Last edited by 1racerdude; 08-20-2006 at 09:47 AM.
1racerdude is offline  
Old 08-20-2006, 09:46 AM
  #59  
Registered User
 
JustNO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,025
Re: Finally!..My cam specs are in!...BUT, is this too big?

Originally Posted by 1racerdude
Mech roller.
OH no Morel isn't the most expensive. Look around and ya will see.
Oh Mech roller thats ok.
Then Morel is the most expensive for hydraulic setups
true?
JustNO is offline  
Old 08-20-2006, 10:07 AM
  #60  
Registered User
 
MEAN LT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Jacksonville,fla
Posts: 1,983
Re: Finally!..My cam specs are in!...BUT, is this too big?

Slowly but surely i feel my SR dreams going out the window. From what it sounds like is that a decent solid roler valvetrain is going to cost in the neighborhood of $1500-$2000. And thats just the parts that are known to fail ie: lifters and springs and lets not forget the shaft mounts. Maybee I'll just put the 2 grand into some 18 degree heads instead and run a HR instead.[sigh]
MEAN LT1 is offline  


Quick Reply: Finally!..My cam specs are in!...BUT, is this too big?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:24 PM.