heads/BRE cam not right??
#91
Re: heads/BRE cam not right??
I guess I could consider erratic cruising at 2500-3000 a possible surge.
I was just more focused on why the car isn't pulling as hard as it should, because cam surge, which can mostly be fixed by tuning, has no affect on the way the car runs at WOT.
There were other things at play (ie injectors) making this car not run up to par. Everyone was focused on surging and how good the tuner is, which was a misdirection. That's all I was trying to get across.
I was just more focused on why the car isn't pulling as hard as it should, because cam surge, which can mostly be fixed by tuning, has no affect on the way the car runs at WOT.
There were other things at play (ie injectors) making this car not run up to par. Everyone was focused on surging and how good the tuner is, which was a misdirection. That's all I was trying to get across.
#92
Re: heads/BRE cam not right??
Jesus can you guys just STFU with all the bickering already. I go get lunch or come back to taking a break and it's 12 more posts of BS arguing. Drop it already.
Bret
Bret
#93
Re: heads/BRE cam not right??
Originally Posted by SStrokerAce
Jesus can you guys just STFU with all the bickering already. I go get lunch or come back to taking a break and it's 12 more posts of BS arguing. Drop it already.
Bret
Bret
Hello pot, meet kettle.
#94
Re: heads/BRE cam not right??
Originally Posted by Javier97Z28
Doubt that.... that being said, my BRE cam'd car with a pcmforless tune runs fine (great actually).
Go figure 'eh?
I have a tiny bit of surge in the lower 2000 rpm range, but like LR said, I just drive around it Might be able to get rid of some of it if I send the logs back to Bryan to take a look at it.
Go figure 'eh?
I have a tiny bit of surge in the lower 2000 rpm range, but like LR said, I just drive around it Might be able to get rid of some of it if I send the logs back to Bryan to take a look at it.
Originally Posted by Javier97Z28
I *never* said that, so please don't quote me as having said such. I have every intention in the world to dyno-tune my car in the future by most likely Jeremy Formato on Florida's west coast.
#95
Re: heads/BRE cam not right??
Originally Posted by RealQuick
The bolded part I highlighted shows your disbelief that the tuner often has to rework the tunes.
My stance is not that a mail order tune cannot be improved upon... I didn't just start doing this stuff yesterday, and after all I've seen and done I think I'd know better.
#96
Re: heads/BRE cam not right??
Originally Posted by Javier97Z28
You're still not quoting me correctly. I stated that I doubt he's reworked many of the 3 mentioned tuner's work... and if he had I doubt he's improved, based on some of the stuff I've read so far in this post. Anyways, bottom line is you misquoted me, or misunderstood me possibly.
My stance is not that a mail order tune cannot be improved upon... I didn't just start doing this stuff yesterday, and after all I've seen and done I think I'd know better.
My stance is not that a mail order tune cannot be improved upon... I didn't just start doing this stuff yesterday, and after all I've seen and done I think I'd know better.
So your doubting this particular guy's tuning versus the work of the three named tuners?? Is that right? Not trying to argue here, but you should easily be able to see how people can interpet it the way i did.
#97
Re: heads/BRE cam not right??
I really don't feel like arguing about it anymore, take my post how you will.
#98
Re: heads/BRE cam not right??
Originally Posted by Javier97Z28
I stated that I doubt he's reworked many of the 3 mentioned tuner's work... and if he had I doubt he's improved, based on some of the stuff I've read so far in this post.
Point out one thing you've read that leads you to believe that he is not a competent tuner.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post