LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

hotcam and RR ratio

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-06-2003, 01:00 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
delbuort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Beale AFB, CA
Posts: 132
hotcam and RR ratio

I'm planning on getting the LT4 Hotcam and I was wonder if you guys that have it already could tell me if I should go with the 1.5 or 1.6 RR? What would the differance be in performance? Advantages and disadvantages please?

Thanks ahead of time for the input,
Jason
delbuort is offline  
Old 06-06-2003, 01:19 AM
  #2  
Registered User
 
stevil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 295
1.6RR, so you get even more lift. More lift = more power. 1.5 is stock ratio, I suppose you could use the stock rockers if you wanted to save some money or something... Almost everyone upgrades to 1.6RR when they do a cam.

Just for comparison, with stock cam and an upgrade to 1.6RR I gained 12 rwhp.
stevil is offline  
Old 06-06-2003, 03:18 AM
  #3  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
delbuort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Beale AFB, CA
Posts: 132
I like the more power thing. I knew that the 1.6 gave more lift but I wasn't sure how much of a differance the 1.6's would make over the 1.5's. Just replacing the stock rockers with the 1.6's and gaining 12hp is a pretty good deal.

Has anyone tried 1.7 or higher with the Hotcam? What kind of gains did you have?
delbuort is offline  
Old 06-06-2003, 12:07 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
EvlViln's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: CA, USA
Posts: 162
Hot cam springs ar only good for about .550 lift, beyond that you run into coil bind. with 1.7 you run into a .558 lift.

Can it be done. Yes.
Should it be done. up to you. I would say no.
I have seen guys run 1.7's and it work for them. But it is easier on the valve train (speaking interms of longevity) to have a high lift cam & 1.5's rather than a low lift cam and 1.7's.

Just my opinion, I could be wrong.
EvlViln is offline  
Old 06-06-2003, 12:26 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
Compstall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Tacoma, WA, USA
Posts: 2,442
I talked to a guy that saw nearly no gain at all between a full roller 1.5 rocker over a 1.6. That leads me to believe that you're gaining the power more from less frictional losses through the roller-type valvetrain over the stamped rockers.

- Brent
Compstall is offline  
Old 06-06-2003, 10:37 PM
  #6  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
delbuort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Beale AFB, CA
Posts: 132
Can any of you guys suggest a nice cam that has a higher lift that I could use with those lower lift rockers? I'm looking for something that is still very streetable (i.e.-the Hotcam). I want some good power gains without compromising a daily driver.

Jason
delbuort is offline  
Old 06-06-2003, 10:50 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
Dave Feerst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: St. Charles, Il
Posts: 641
The reason most people dont gain much from just switching to 1.6 rockers is the stock heads, Believe it or not the intake of my bone stock heads at 10 inches of water column flowed 115CFM at .450 lift which is about stock valve lift and 113CFM from .500 all the way through .600. No more airflow means no more horsepower and a loss of torqure due to air velocity, However on the ramps of the cam lobe the lift increase can cause more airflow. And on the exhaust side my heads were still increasing airflow up till .550 lift with stock heads. So that would lead me to believe almost all gains from the 1.6 would be from the exhaust side and the gains might acually be better with the 1.6 on the exhaust side only (with stock heads that is). gonna try it one of these days.
Regardless, 1.7s on stock heads are useless and dangerous.... Switching from a stamped 1.6 to roller 1.6 ive seen gains of 2-3 HP so frictional loss does play a small part but I wouldnt say its the majority of the change.
Dave Feerst is offline  
Old 06-06-2003, 10:57 PM
  #8  
Registered User
 
Cmr0z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Palm City, Florida
Posts: 4,287
just get the LT4 hotcam kit and save urself the money, it comes with 1. 6 rockers and all the other crap
Cmr0z28 is offline  
Old 06-06-2003, 11:38 PM
  #9  
Registered User
 
yorkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Madison, North Carolina
Posts: 588
another waste of money

just use the 1.5 rockers unless you go with the kit with 1.6's The gains are soooo minimal, just put ice on the intake and get more hp then the 1.6's Ha Ha
yorkie is offline  
Old 06-07-2003, 02:22 AM
  #10  
Registered User
 
stevil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 295
Re: another waste of money

Originally posted by yorkie
just use the 1.5 rockers unless you go with the kit with 1.6's The gains are soooo minimal, just put ice on the intake and get more hp then the 1.6's Ha Ha
Minimal gains? Can you just pull 10-15 rwhp out of your *** or what? I have before and after dyno results, could you please post your "bag of ice" dyno sheets?

Bottom line, 1.6 rockers add .030" of lift on a stock cam over 1.5, and .033" more with the LT4 Hot Cam. Part of the reason for switching to a bigger cam is, get this... more lift!

Originally posted by delbuort

Can any of you guys suggest a nice cam that has a higher lift that I could use with those lower lift rockers? I'm looking for something that is still very streetable (i.e.-the Hotcam). I want some good power gains without compromising a daily driver.
Jason, check out this page:

http://www.fierolt1.com/lt1_camdata.htm

It shows what the cams lift will end up doing with what rocker ratio (1.5 & 1.6). They make some cams that have more lift, but check the duration... I'd just get the Hot Cam kit and be done with it, should have cam, springs, rockers, etc.
stevil is offline  
Old 06-07-2003, 02:38 AM
  #11  
Registered User
 
Blue96z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 709
couple questions..what is the honest RWHP gain in a stock car like mine(see sig)...also can the 1.6 in the kit be used w/the stock valve covers.....?
one more(sorry) how street able is the lt4 hot cam kit?, anyone know affects on gas mlg or computer...does it require tuning or a chip?
thanks ahead of time you your input
Blue96z28 is offline  
Old 06-07-2003, 07:27 AM
  #12  
Registered User
 
Dave Feerst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: St. Charles, Il
Posts: 641
the kit is very nice. It is mostly top end gain which makes it great for the track. From the people I've talked to 1-2 MPG loss and the best improvement i saw was a 94 Intake / shortie headers / catback / BBK 52mm TB he ran mid 13s without the cam and with just the cam (kit) swap ran 12.78 at 108 (US 41 dragway on a less than good day for racing. through stock heads and everything. The car till sounded stock at Idle too. but I dont think it would pass an IM240
Dave Feerst is offline  
Old 06-07-2003, 09:17 AM
  #13  
Registered User
 
redkillerz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: NC
Posts: 47
Thumbs up

I just completed a complete overhaul of my 95 z28 and I installed the hot cam kit with 1.6rr and it sounds great Idles with a good lope, I did a port and polish on my heads though, I gained .45 in the 1/8 mile this past thursday running consistant 8.8's in the 1/8th had one 8.7. I put down a mustang 5.0 with nitrous and a cammed up 2000 ss ls1 with programming and long tubes that night as well, I can't wait to see how much better it will do with programming, it made a difference for me, the rr in the kit will fit under the stock valve covers as well no interference did not have to modify them at all hope this helps you decide.
redkillerz is offline  
Old 06-07-2003, 12:56 PM
  #14  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
delbuort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Beale AFB, CA
Posts: 132
stevil,

Nice page. Thanks for the info guys. I think you've all talked me into just getting the Hotcam kit and leaving well enough alone.

Right now I'm looking at staying as cheap as possible. I've found the entire kit at www.samtaylor.com/html/parts.html for $465, but I was wondering if I could get it cheaper piece-by-piece? I've found the springs, retainer, shims, and keys for about $60 and the Hotcam for $185 (shipped) from http://www.sdpc2000.com/cart.asp?act...tart&catid=540 And, a set of rockers at Jeg's, http://www.jegs.com/cgi-bin/ncommerc...59&prmenbr=361 part number 778-66915C for $189. So, it all comes to about $30 less than buying the kit togeter and I don't have to money at this moment to spend on the entire kit. I was think of buying it a little bit at a time and work my way up to it. My question is...has anyone used these rockers before and are they a suitable replacement for the ones that come in the kit? Sorry for the long post. And again, thanks for the info.

Jason
delbuort is offline  
Old 06-07-2003, 01:36 PM
  #15  
Registered User
 
yorkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Madison, North Carolina
Posts: 588
I would just put the hotcam, forget the ....

roller rockers, I went with just the cam and 1.5 stock rokers, gives you .492 lift, gmpartsdirect.com has the cam for 185.00 delivered too. Anything over .495 requires the factory 85 pond springs to be changed, if you use the hotcam and the 1.5 rockers, no spring upgrade needed.

Eric
yorkie is offline  


Quick Reply: hotcam and RR ratio



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:55 PM.