LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

How is the GM847 with stock heads?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-21-2008, 03:16 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
JoeliusZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Detroit
Posts: 2,926
How is the GM847 with stock heads?

Ive been set on the cc503 for forever, but lately everytime i watch a video of one i just cant help but think it sounds too small. And when i say sound... i dont mean im looking for sound here, im using that to judge how it might behave in comparison to other cars ive driven.

My car is a weekend car... probably sees about 2k per year, and has 90k on it. cam effects dont bother me within reason. Lope, surge, etc make it all the more fun for me... but i dont want bucking to the point i feel like the car is taking abuse from it.

So im curious how the 847 is on stock heads. Will the limit of stock heads keep the engine from wanting to rev straight to 7k? I want to shift about 6200 rpm and i dont care if im not getting the "full benefit" of the cam. also approximately what is the rpm range... does it still have good torque about 2500 rpm? Would running 1.5 rockers help tame it down at all or would that just be a pointless power loss? Ive also read in my searching that some people have "degreed" their GM847s... what does that mean and what can it do?

Im planning on custom tuning the car myself, so that is not an issue.

Last edited by JoeliusZ28; 02-21-2008 at 03:19 PM.
JoeliusZ28 is offline  
Old 02-21-2008, 06:31 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
marshall93z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Mooresville, NC
Posts: 2,640
Still waiting to fire mine up.

And I'll be the first to admit that I bought it for the sound! But I do have the supporting mods to make it not such a turd.
marshall93z is offline  
Old 02-21-2008, 08:52 PM
  #3  
Registered User
 
zhevy-1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Boulder, CO. USA
Posts: 506
I've had the 846 on my Z28 and I liked it. It was a good performing cam. Unfortunately, I've had a bad ported set of heads, and never got the chance to really tap into its might

After going thru a couple of stroker engines, and a lot of other stuff, I'm now in the process of putting in a stock bottom-end and a set of aftermarket heads, possibly a set of Trick Flow heads and the 847 cam and call it good...
zhevy-1 is offline  
Old 02-22-2008, 11:42 AM
  #4  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
JoeliusZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Detroit
Posts: 2,926
no one has this setup?
JoeliusZ28 is offline  
Old 02-22-2008, 12:05 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
11secgen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: houston
Posts: 321
yes the 847 cam works pretty well with stock heads.there is a thread about that here some place. 1.5 rockers are deff the way to go,you dont need the extra lift w/ stock ports.degreeing the cam is a way to check the valve timing and compinsate for anything that could throw it off,like chain streach or line boring the mains.most people agree that unless its a dedicated race motor,it isnt worth the extra cost.were talking two hours shop time for 10 hp at best, but prob little to no gain at all. with 90k on the engine your on the right track keeping the shift point at 6200,but in my opinion if your dead set on shifting at 6200 then the 503 might be a lil faster.i say go with the 847 and shift it at 66 when your racing,baby it the rest of the time.
11secgen is offline  
Old 02-22-2008, 12:17 PM
  #6  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
JoeliusZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Detroit
Posts: 2,926
Originally Posted by 11secgen
yes the 847 cam works pretty well with stock heads.there is a thread about that here some place. 1.5 rockers are deff the way to go,you dont need the extra lift w/ stock ports.degreeing the cam is a way to check the valve timing and compinsate for anything that could throw it off,like chain streach or line boring the mains.most people agree that unless its a dedicated race motor,it isnt worth the extra cost.were talking two hours shop time for 10 hp at best, but prob little to no gain at all. with 90k on the engine your on the right track keeping the shift point at 6200,but in my opinion if your dead set on shifting at 6200 then the 503 might be a lil faster.i say go with the 847 and shift it at 66 when your racing,baby it the rest of the time.
thanks i will try to find that thread.

Ive read that the 847 makes much more power from 4k up... but i dont know if that requires headwork or not. I want a monster on top but i dont want it to be dead under 3k either, i want some torque.
JoeliusZ28 is offline  
Old 02-22-2008, 12:33 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
Kevin Blown 95 TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,684
Maybe you could set it up with some Rhodes lifters or some others that bleed down at lower rpms so that you have less duration and lift when you dont want it for just driving around. That's one way to lessen the effects of too big of a cam when you want to drive it normally.
Kevin Blown 95 TA is offline  
Old 02-22-2008, 12:36 PM
  #8  
Registered User
 
11secgen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: houston
Posts: 321
ive never seen a fast bleed roller b4,but there are alot of things ive never seen.
11secgen is offline  
Old 02-22-2008, 12:42 PM
  #9  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
JoeliusZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Detroit
Posts: 2,926
Originally Posted by Kevin Blown 95 TA
Maybe you could set it up with some Rhodes lifters or some others that bleed down at lower rpms so that you have less duration and lift when you dont want it for just driving around. That's one way to lessen the effects of too big of a cam when you want to drive it normally.
ive never even heard of anything like that, would you have more info? Sounds quite expensive though.
JoeliusZ28 is offline  
Old 02-22-2008, 05:27 PM
  #10  
Registered User
 
Kevin Blown 95 TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,684
Originally Posted by JoeliusZ28
ive never even heard of anything like that, would you have more info? Sounds quite expensive though.
Heres a link to the site - http://www.rhoadsproducts.com/Pages/...lOERoller.html

They do make a hyd roller that will vary the duration. They're not cheap and they may be noisy which might cause a prob with the knock sensor.

Here's a discussion on them http://www.camaros.net/forums/showthread.php?t=35628

Check some other manufacturers for similar products.
Kevin Blown 95 TA is offline  
Old 02-22-2008, 06:04 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
dangalla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: lakeville, pa
Posts: 2,092
Originally Posted by 11secgen
yes the 847 cam works pretty well with stock heads.there is a thread about that here some place.
i would like to read that please post it, that cam really likes to rev out and i cant imagine stock heads are going to let that happen. if you plan to use stock heads you should really choose a cam that will utalize your usable rpm range

Originally Posted by 11secgen
degreeing the cam is a way to check the valve timing and compinsate for anything that could throw it off,like chain streach or line boring the mains.most people agree that unless its a dedicated race motor,it isnt worth the extra cost.
you should never install a cam without degreeing it.

it has nothing to do with chain streach.

it has nothing to do with line boring.

and i doubt you will find many people to agree with you statement here, if anyone
dangalla is offline  
Old 02-23-2008, 09:12 AM
  #12  
Registered User
 
brain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Columbia, SC, USA
Posts: 746
Originally Posted by JoeliusZ28
thanks i will try to find that thread.

Ive read that the 847 makes much more power from 4k up... but i dont know if that requires headwork or not. I want a monster on top but i dont want it to be dead under 3k either, i want some torque.
847 is the best cam for the most power on stock heads. It will make more power and tq past 3000 rpms, and doesn't loose much before 3k, unless you compare to a stock car with manifolds. Here's my before and after dyno. Before is with LTs and CAI. After is just the cam and 1.6 rockers added.
brain is offline  
Old 02-23-2008, 09:38 AM
  #13  
Registered User
 
Zigroid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Stroudsburg, PA
Posts: 948
Originally Posted by brain
847 is the best cam for the most power on stock heads. It will make more power and tq past 3000 rpms, and doesn't loose much before 3k, unless you compare to a stock car with manifolds. Here's my before and after dyno. Before is with LTs and CAI. After is just the cam and 1.6 rockers added.


you had a "\" where you should have had a "/"

what rpm do you shift at?

I'm putting a cam in my car that is slightly larger than a GM847 with stock heads and a freshened stock bottom end. just wondering where I can expect to shift.

Last edited by Zigroid; 02-23-2008 at 09:41 AM.
Zigroid is offline  
Old 02-23-2008, 11:48 AM
  #14  
Registered User
 
11secgen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: houston
Posts: 321
Originally Posted by dangalla
i would like to read that please post it, that cam really likes to rev out and i cant imagine stock heads are going to let that happen. if you plan to use stock heads you should really choose a cam that will utalize your usable rpm range



you should never install a cam without degreeing it.

it has nothing to do with chain streach.

it has nothing to do with line boring.

and i doubt you will find many people to agree with you statement here, if anyone
i bet you a buck about 90% of the cammed lt-1's on this message bord wernt degreed in when installed.
now i do agree with one thing you said, 'you should never install a cam without degreeing it''.it [I]should[I] be done, but often isnt with little to no negative consequences.now did i degree in the cam when i built my 7 second monza engine?of corse, but did i degree in the 847 on my otherwise stock lt-1? no.
line boring shortens the distance between the cam and crank,causing slack in the chain and affecting the valve timing,so i always throw the wheel on it when the engine has been line bored,same deal when a timing chain is being reused,the slack effects the vave timing.
now to get back on topic, these dyno results were exactly what this thread needed!
11secgen is offline  
Old 02-23-2008, 12:34 PM
  #15  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
JoeliusZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Detroit
Posts: 2,926
i want to shift at about 6200 unless im really trying to beat somebody, ill take it a little higher.... but i want my bottom end to stay in one piece.

since i have started this thread im now thinking about going with either an AI or lunati cam... or getting a 224/230 or 230/236 ground really tight. Im think the 224/230 on a 108+2 would be a pretty wild cam without wanting 7k rpm shifts.

Last edited by JoeliusZ28; 02-23-2008 at 01:02 PM.
JoeliusZ28 is offline  


Quick Reply: How is the GM847 with stock heads?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:26 PM.