how slower is stock lt1 than ls1
05-02-2005, 10:05 PM
#46
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 165
Re: how slower is stock lt1 than ls1
I didn't read the whole thread but here we had a ls1 car (sorry don't know the year) and it was running 9.0-9.1 and it was stock, my LT1 was running 8.6 at the same track maybe its a diiferent story in the 1/4. Just what I have seen, maybe it was sick?
05-02-2005, 11:35 PM
#47
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB, Canada
Posts: 627
Re: how slower is stock lt1 than ls1
to answer the question, an lt1 is a lot slower than an ls1, all other things being equal ofcourse (that should go without saying). Stock ls1 heads will produce the same power as fully ported lt1 heads with oversize valves, with any given camshaft. As far as I know, the ls1 motor produce more torque on an engine dyno at just about any given rpm than the lt1 will.
05-02-2005, 11:39 PM
#48
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: NY...what a bad place for a nice car
Posts: 2,315
Re: how slower is stock lt1 than ls1
well u gotta think about it , GM made teh LS1 to outperform the LT1 and the way i c it they did a good job
better flowing heads and intake, better ignition sysetem , aluminum block is lighter (i like iron myself) better topend but overall the LT1 is somewhat inferior to teh LS1 IMHO
thats one think GM wanted and thats what the designed
better flowing heads and intake, better ignition sysetem , aluminum block is lighter (i like iron myself) better topend but overall the LT1 is somewhat inferior to teh LS1 IMHO
thats one think GM wanted and thats what the designed
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
F'n1996Z28SS
Cars For Sale
8
08-23-2023 11:19 PM
dbusch22
Forced Induction
6
10-31-2016 11:09 AM
Brandon Wittmer
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
3
12-03-2014 09:28 PM