HP diff from hi-flow cat and no cat.
#20
Re: HP diff from hi-flow cat and no cat.
Originally Posted by 96vortechSS
Don't know the exact hp differance but it's more power with no cat. I understand the theory but the airflow still isn't as straight and it slows down in velocity b/c the shape of a cat is a reverse venturri.
Not to be arguementive. but a good highflow cat goes for around $250.
There woulnd't be a market if there was HP loss. If you loose ANY power your you bought a bad cat. even with high hp engines it doesn't matter. The volumetric displacement is a calculated match.
In fact, a well made high flow cat can actually improve HP as opposed to a gutted cat, with exhaust. Using a gutted cat causes the exhaust gasses to expand, only to be forced to compress in to the exhaust, this creates more back pressure.
If you go with a straight pipe, it will probably be the same, but then you have to worry about emissions.
#21
Re: HP diff from hi-flow cat and no cat.
Originally Posted by Eff
Wrong.
Not to be arguementive. but a good highflow cat goes for around $250.
There woulnd't be a market if there was HP loss. If you loose ANY power your you bought a bad cat. even with high hp engines it doesn't matter. The volumetric displacement is a calculated match.
In fact, a well made high flow cat can actually improve HP as opposed to a gutted cat, with exhaust. Using a gutted cat causes the exhaust gasses to expand, only to be forced to compress in to the exhaust, this creates more back pressure.
If you go with a straight pipe, it will probably be the same, but then you have to worry about emissions.
Not to be arguementive. but a good highflow cat goes for around $250.
There woulnd't be a market if there was HP loss. If you loose ANY power your you bought a bad cat. even with high hp engines it doesn't matter. The volumetric displacement is a calculated match.
In fact, a well made high flow cat can actually improve HP as opposed to a gutted cat, with exhaust. Using a gutted cat causes the exhaust gasses to expand, only to be forced to compress in to the exhaust, this creates more back pressure.
If you go with a straight pipe, it will probably be the same, but then you have to worry about emissions.
#22
Re: HP diff from hi-flow cat and no cat.
Originally Posted by Eff
Wrong.
Not to be arguementive. but a good highflow cat goes for around $250.
There woulnd't be a market if there was HP loss. If you loose ANY power your you bought a bad cat. even with high hp engines it doesn't matter. The volumetric displacement is a calculated match.
In fact, a well made high flow cat can actually improve HP as opposed to a gutted cat, with exhaust. Using a gutted cat causes the exhaust gasses to expand, only to be forced to compress in to the exhaust, this creates more back pressure.
If you go with a straight pipe, it will probably be the same, but then you have to worry about emissions.
Not to be arguementive. but a good highflow cat goes for around $250.
There woulnd't be a market if there was HP loss. If you loose ANY power your you bought a bad cat. even with high hp engines it doesn't matter. The volumetric displacement is a calculated match.
In fact, a well made high flow cat can actually improve HP as opposed to a gutted cat, with exhaust. Using a gutted cat causes the exhaust gasses to expand, only to be forced to compress in to the exhaust, this creates more back pressure.
If you go with a straight pipe, it will probably be the same, but then you have to worry about emissions.
1) Price doesn't matter. Performance does.
2) It makes a HUGE difference what HP you are making, and how a high flow cat will affect that HP.
3) A straight pipe flows more than any high flow cat, given the same inlet/outlet tube diameter
Did you get a chance to read the post that I linked to?
Dan
#24
Re: HP diff from hi-flow cat and no cat.
Originally Posted by DiabloGT
ok, so how much of a diff will i notice in hp with a magnaflow carsound cat and a straight pipe on a 400rwhp+ car with lts and lm exhaust?
thanks
thanks
Just for reference, the two stock converters on an LS1 flow 567.8 cfm together. This means that they will support 258 HP without HP loss. We all know that the LS1 makes more HP than 258, and probably more like 330 flywheel HP. The stock cats on an LS1 rob 8 rwhp according to that link. So that gives you some idea of the HP loss from cats.
Dan
#25
Re: HP diff from hi-flow cat and no cat.
Originally Posted by DiabloGT
ok, so how much of a diff will i notice in hp with a magnaflow carsound cat and a straight pipe on a 400rwhp+ car with lts and lm exhaust?
thanks
thanks
Last edited by 96vortechSS; 05-30-2005 at 11:13 PM.
#26
Re: HP diff from hi-flow cat and no cat.
The cats need heat to work right so placeing them right after the headers would be your best bet for emissions. Remember the exhaust slows down a lot once it leaves the headers.
-b
-b
#27
Re: HP diff from hi-flow cat and no cat.
Originally Posted by stereomandan
Sorry Eff, but do you have ANY data to prove what you are saying? No offense, but you will have a very hard finding any because your argument is wrong. Sorry if that sounds harsh.
1) Price doesn't matter. Performance does.
2) It makes a HUGE difference what HP you are making, and how a high flow cat will affect that HP.
3) A straight pipe flows more than any high flow cat, given the same inlet/outlet tube diameter
Did you get a chance to read the post that I linked to?
Dan
1) Price doesn't matter. Performance does.
2) It makes a HUGE difference what HP you are making, and how a high flow cat will affect that HP.
3) A straight pipe flows more than any high flow cat, given the same inlet/outlet tube diameter
Did you get a chance to read the post that I linked to?
Dan
1) Agreed. but quite often you get what you pay for.
2) The amount of HP lost to a standard cat... your are correct.
3) now here is where I ask for your credibility. prove it! If you meant chamber size. I agree with you.
#28
Re: HP diff from hi-flow cat and no cat.
Originally Posted by Eff
Well, having access to a Chasis dyno in school, for three weeks I played with a 94 z28. changing the exhaust system or nitrous jets. up to 465hp I didn't see any loss in power There is my credibility. wheres yours?
1) Agreed. but quite often you get what you pay for.
2) The amount of HP lost to a standard cat... your are correct.
3) now here is where I ask for your credibility. prove it! If you meant chamber size. I agree with you.
1) Agreed. but quite often you get what you pay for.
2) The amount of HP lost to a standard cat... your are correct.
3) now here is where I ask for your credibility. prove it! If you meant chamber size. I agree with you.
2) Why do you think a high flow cat is THAT much better then a standard cat. They are better, but they don't flow like a straight pipe. Did you see the flow results on the link I posted? Show me flow results from a cat that has the same airflow as a straight pipe with the same inlet and outlet diameter.
3) The ONLY affects you are going to see in a straight pipe are the edge effects. On a high flow cat, you have the transistion from small to large volume, then back to a small volume and then you have the catalyst elements directly in the air stream and then the edge effects on top of that.
Dan
#29
Re: HP diff from hi-flow cat and no cat.
You're exactly right, but the larger diameter does make up for it.
Anyway. http://www.cardomain.com/ride/764567 (red car)after doing all the testing on all the shop cars I took off my straight pipe and went with a MAC high flow cat. HP numbers were basicly identical.'
My headers are MAC shorty's 1 5/8 primary's 3" at the collector, B&B triflow Catback.
We can argue all day about which flow's better. but one way or another it's not enough to make a difference on the dyno.
Anyway. http://www.cardomain.com/ride/764567 (red car)after doing all the testing on all the shop cars I took off my straight pipe and went with a MAC high flow cat. HP numbers were basicly identical.'
My headers are MAC shorty's 1 5/8 primary's 3" at the collector, B&B triflow Catback.
We can argue all day about which flow's better. but one way or another it's not enough to make a difference on the dyno.
#30
Re: HP diff from hi-flow cat and no cat.
Originally Posted by Eff
We can argue all day about which flow's better. but one way or another it's not enough to make a difference on the dyno.
MAC's I also have the MAC mids ('94-'95) style with a bullet muffler in place of the cat, and a Hooker catback. I also have a carsound highflow cat sitting on my shelf if I ever want to use it. I can swap it for the bullet muffler in a couple of minutes.
Dan
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PFYC
Supporting Vendor Group Purchases and Sales
0
09-11-2015 09:44 AM