LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

LE1 dyno results

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-22-2007, 10:30 AM
  #16  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
bringBackCamaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 166
I did the fuel pump because mine died all of a sudden. I do not think the stock injectors could keep up with this setup. There are alot worse places to spend 260 bucks.

I had originally thought of 2.5 inch because of the info posted by OldSchoolSS
showing:
A 2.5” dual system is good for a 513hp engine with zero loss…
A 3” dual system is good for a 812hp engine with zero loss…

Lloyd says 3" and he certainly has not steered me wrong, so im really confused which to do now
bringBackCamaro is offline  
Old 01-22-2007, 10:36 AM
  #17  
Banned
 
mdacton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Goochland, Va.
Posts: 4,970
nice results, the 2.5 duals would probly be fine for a while
mdacton is offline  
Old 01-22-2007, 11:47 AM
  #18  
Registered User
 
96flame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Waterloo, Ontario
Posts: 599
Great numbers for the LE1 package. I'm very happy with my LE2 head LE2 emission cam setup.
96flame is offline  
Old 01-22-2007, 11:54 AM
  #19  
Registered User
 
Critter's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: fort worth/burleson Tx
Posts: 1,511
2.5 is what u would need in this case. 3 inch is overkill and hurts the gc.
Critter is offline  
Old 01-22-2007, 12:22 PM
  #20  
Registered User
 
Z-RATED94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Carol Stream, Il.
Posts: 3,557
bringBackCamaro, very nice results and I know what you mean about going bigger. I myself am very happy with my LE package which has a cam a smidge smaller then yours. Once the few bugs were worked out and I found out how easy it was to get emissions exempt, I was like damn, I should have went LE2 with the cam. Don't forget to post up the graph.
Z-RATED94 is offline  
Old 01-22-2007, 12:28 PM
  #21  
Registered User
 
blackztpi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,810
for that kind of power, it'd be a good idea to switch to a bigger injector just to keep your injectors working at less than 90-100% capacity at WOT. a new fuel pump is a cheap, good way to upgrade
blackztpi is offline  
Old 01-22-2007, 02:07 PM
  #22  
Registered User
 
speed_demon24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Ocala, Florida
Posts: 3,245
Man this thread makes me anxious to get my car back on the dyno, my best pull was 374rwhp at 5800, then I started getting valve float. If my new valve stem seals would ever come in from discount I could shim my springs....
speed_demon24 is offline  
Old 01-22-2007, 05:03 PM
  #23  
Registered User
 
NightTrain66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Red Oak Texas
Posts: 1,509
I would still go with 3" true duals.

I got these parts . . . .

http://www.jegs.com/webapp/wcs/store...55652_-1_11525

(555-30662)

http://www.jegs.com/webapp/wcs/store...49870_-1_10265

(289-24222)

http://www.jegs.com/webapp/wcs/store...52880_-1_11533

(555-30643)

http://www.jegs.com/webapp/wcs/store...53274_-1_11527

(555-30733)

I spent about $120 at the muffler shop getting it installed. They added a few 3" pieces of pipe and a couple of pieces needed to be bent.

A 58 MM TB will help a lil (3-5 HP at the most over your 52 MM TB) but I would get the exhaust first and port the intake second. I would upgrade to 58 MM TB after that.

Re adjust the rockers to about 1/16 past zero lash and you will be good to go.

That should put you REAL close to 400 RWHP and 375 RWTQ if you can get some hands on tuning to tweak it on the dyno.

Last edited by NightTrain66; 01-22-2007 at 11:09 PM.
NightTrain66 is offline  
Old 01-22-2007, 05:08 PM
  #24  
Registered User
 
tireburnin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,193
I didn't see it posted, so I'll ask for clarification.

What lifters are you using?

Congrats on the impressive numbers.
tireburnin is offline  
Old 01-22-2007, 05:32 PM
  #25  
Registered User
 
speed_demon24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Ocala, Florida
Posts: 3,245
Originally Posted by NightTrain66
I would still go with 3" true duals.

I got these parts . . . .

http://www.jegs.com/webapp/wcs/store...55652_-1_11525

(555-30662)

http://www.jegs.com/webapp/wcs/store...52880_-1_11533

(289-24222)

http://www.jegs.com/webapp/wcs/store...52880_-1_11533

(555-30643)

http://www.jegs.com/webapp/wcs/store...53274_-1_11527

(555-30733)

I spent about $120 at the muffler shop getting it installed. They added a few 3" pieces of pipe and a couple of pieces needed to be bent.

A 58 MM TB will help a lil (3-5 HP at the most over your 52 MM TB) but I would get the exhaust first and port the intake second. I would upgrade to 58 MM TB after that.

Re adjust the rockers to about 1/16 past zero lash and you will be good to go.

That should put you REAL close to 400 RWHP and 375 RWTQ if you can get some hands on tuning to tweak it on the dyno.

If he's worried about noise just get it run out the back too, it only cost me $300 to have it all welded up and run out the back for my setup, 3" from collector to exhaust tip.
speed_demon24 is offline  
Old 01-22-2007, 05:33 PM
  #26  
Banned
 
SStrokerAce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,518
Originally Posted by blackztpi
dang man... i've got a bre cam that is pretty large and some stockish/mildly ported heads and i only put down 363 hp 355ft.lbs. i guess i need some heads and true duals.
I've figured your heads were a lot like stock, so don't worry too much about that. A good VJ and quailty porting should get you over 400rwhp easy with your cam.

Either way if you go off of stock castings 365rwhp ain't bad.

Bret
SStrokerAce is offline  
Old 01-22-2007, 05:49 PM
  #27  
Registered User
 
speed_demon24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Ocala, Florida
Posts: 3,245
Originally Posted by bringBackCamaro
I did the fuel pump because mine died all of a sudden. I do not think the stock injectors could keep up with this setup. There are alot worse places to spend 260 bucks.

I had originally thought of 2.5 inch because of the info posted by OldSchoolSS
showing:
A 2.5” dual system is good for a 513hp engine with zero loss…
A 3” dual system is good for a 812hp engine with zero loss…

Lloyd says 3" and he certainly has not steered me wrong, so im really confused which to do now
Thats assuming there are no bends in the piping and no mufflers.
speed_demon24 is offline  
Old 01-22-2007, 07:21 PM
  #28  
Banned
 
user 647483's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 1,444
Awesome numbers, can't wait to see the graph.
A good exhaust goes a long way to waking the car up.
And those extra wide band clamps in Lloyd's note above are awesome!
user 647483 is offline  
Old 01-22-2007, 11:10 PM
  #29  
Registered User
 
NightTrain66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Red Oak Texas
Posts: 1,509
I added the link to the mufflers also to the list. I had the turn downs listed twice and no mufflers.

http://www.jegs.com/webapp/wcs/store...49870_-1_10265
NightTrain66 is offline  
Old 01-23-2007, 12:04 AM
  #30  
Registered User
 
big dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Silver Spring ,Md.
Posts: 564
Those are pretty good numbers for such a mild setup. I wonder how much less power an a4 would make with the same mods.
big dave is offline  


Quick Reply: LE1 dyno results



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:35 PM.