LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Low Temp Thermostat

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-24-2008, 04:28 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Counted Out's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 1,025
Low Temp Thermostat

So I have a couple questions-

1. I have manual fan switches, and for the most part I always leave both of them running, is that bad?

2. Is getting a low-temp Thermostat worth getting if I already have the manual switch?

3. The past owner did alot of the low cost mods, how can I tell if the thero has already been changed?
Counted Out is offline  
Old 03-24-2008, 06:03 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
1997whitez28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: CT
Posts: 244
same here

same questions, any answers?
1997whitez28 is offline  
Old 03-24-2008, 07:50 PM
  #3  
Registered User
 
shoebox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Little Rock, AR
Posts: 27,714
1. IMHO, not necessary or needed. Wasteful. It's just more wear and tear on the fans and causes more drag from the alternator to make the power.

2. Yes. The fans won't nearly have to run as much.

3. If you have a 160° thermostat, your cruising temp will normally be less and the needle will stay more toward the low end of the gauge. The thermostat also has a stamp on it with the temp rating.
shoebox is offline  
Old 03-24-2008, 07:53 PM
  #4  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Counted Out's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 1,025
Originally Posted by shoebox

2. Yes. The fans won't nearly have to run as much.
But couldn't I just turn the fans on anytime I saw it start to get hot? I'm just a little confused.
Counted Out is offline  
Old 03-24-2008, 08:07 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
shoebox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Little Rock, AR
Posts: 27,714
You can turn the fans on any time you want. With the lower temp thermostat, you won't need them as often. People seem to get obsessed with keeping the engine cooler than it needs to be.
shoebox is offline  
Old 03-24-2008, 10:03 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
kylersaulsbury's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 280
Originally Posted by shoebox
You can turn the fans on any time you want. With the lower temp thermostat, you won't need them as often. People seem to get obsessed with keeping the engine cooler than it needs to be.
Just curious what would you do, if you had a motor w/o any emissions? Im just wondering b/c I do know the adverse affects of lowering the engine running temp and also how the emissions also help lower combustion temps. So basically which one out ways the other?
kylersaulsbury is offline  
Old 03-25-2008, 09:10 AM
  #7  
Administrator
 
Injuneer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
Posts: 70,825
Lower coolant temps reduce the thermal efficiency of the engine = less power output. In the LT1, there appears to be an offset of this loss through gains from reduced inlet air charge temperature, and the ability to crank in a few degrees extra advance. If you aren't tweeking the tune, you probably aren't gaining much by super-cooling the engine. It's not all about emissions, although that plays a part. The only proven power producer in the over-rated Hypertech Power Programmer was the low temp stat + their tune to lower the fan temps and play with the timing.
Injuneer is offline  
Old 03-25-2008, 09:52 AM
  #8  
Registered User
 
95ltbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: idaho
Posts: 103
so your saying with us cooling down the overly hot running engines of our cars it makes them slower? if it makes them slower...why the HELL do we put these things in?
95ltbird is offline  
Old 03-25-2008, 11:06 AM
  #9  
Registered User
 
shoebox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Little Rock, AR
Posts: 27,714
Originally Posted by 95ltbird
so your saying with us cooling down the overly hot running engines of our cars it makes them slower? if it makes them slower...why the HELL do we put these things in?
I don't think that was said at all. I suggest you re-read.
shoebox is offline  
Old 03-25-2008, 11:13 AM
  #10  
Administrator
 
Injuneer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
Posts: 70,825
Originally Posted by 95ltbird
so your saying with us cooling down the overly hot running engines of our cars it makes them slower? if it makes them slower...why the HELL do we put these things in?
As I already posted, you have three things working in different directions:

1) Reduced coolant temp lowers engine thermal efficiency = lost HP

2) Reduced inlet air charge temp increases air density = increased HP

3) More aggressive timing may increase HP (depends on stock vs. modified)

The "net" is the combination of 1 + 2 + 3. If you don't do "3", you are leaving something on the table, and possible gaining nothing at all.

And.... why do you say the engines are "overly hot running"? They were designed to run at the stock fan on/off temps. There is no harm in running them at that temperature. Yes, it lowers emissions, but it also improves fuel economy. Yes, if you do it correctly, you may gain some power with lower coolant temperature. But there seems to be way too much fascination with lowering engine operating temperatures, without a basic understanding of what is happening.
Injuneer is offline  
Old 03-25-2008, 12:57 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
caldercay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 466
Originally Posted by Injuneer
But there seems to be way too much fascination with lowering engine operating temperatures, without a basic understanding of what is happening.
I'll take a stab at why - the fascination is probably due to folks
feeling threatened by engine overheating. When I first got my Z,
the average temp hovered around the first tic (which I think relates
to somewhere around 180*). Now, she seems to hover more closely
to the 1/2 tick mark (210*?). But I dont sweat it - I just flip the A/C
on and that will bring it down.

However, during the summer months down here in south Texas,
the temps can average 95-100*, so the cooling system has to work
harder - during the summer months, the gauge sits on the 1/2 tick
mark.

The point is, I think folks worry about the danger of the engine overheating.
caldercay is offline  
Old 04-12-2008, 04:33 PM
  #12  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Counted Out's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 1,025
Sorry, another question.

Do you have to get the PCM tuned for a new thermostat?

And how much will it effect emissions? Would I be able to change back to the stock one before I had to go to emissions, or would that require tuning the PCM back?
Counted Out is offline  
Old 04-12-2008, 04:41 PM
  #13  
Registered User
 
shoebox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Little Rock, AR
Posts: 27,714
No, you don't have to do anything to the PCM. I sometimes swap between the 180 and 160 in winter/summer.
shoebox is offline  
Old 04-12-2008, 07:46 PM
  #14  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Counted Out's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 1,025
Originally Posted by shoebox
No, you don't have to do anything to the PCM. I sometimes swap between the 180 and 160 in winter/summer.
I noticed the "have" was in italics, what to emphasize?
Counted Out is offline  
Old 04-12-2008, 10:46 PM
  #15  
Registered User
 
shoebox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Little Rock, AR
Posts: 27,714
Originally Posted by Counted Out
I noticed the "have" was in italics, what to emphasize?
Some people like to adjust the fans ON temps to go along with the thermostat change, but you don't have to.
shoebox is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PFYC
Supporting Vendor Group Purchases and Sales
0
01-23-2015 01:13 PM
cmdeshon
LT1 Based Engine Tech
16
12-27-2014 10:06 AM
AlaskaZ28
LT1 Based Engine Tech
4
12-16-2014 07:24 PM
AlaskaZ28
New Member Introduction
2
12-10-2014 02:39 PM
AlaskaZ28
LT1 Based Engine Tech
1
12-10-2014 02:37 PM



Quick Reply: Low Temp Thermostat



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:37 PM.