CamaroZ28.Com Message Board

LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

LT1 Dyno Results

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-12-2007, 06:11 PM
  #16  
Registered User
 
96flame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Waterloo, Ontario
Posts: 599
Great #'s
96flame is offline  
Reply
Old 03-12-2007, 08:38 PM
  #17  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
95Z28ConvtM6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Cherry Hill, NJ
Posts: 72
Good point. I removed the reference to forged. If I went to a forged bottom end, it would be over 400 cubes :-)
95Z28ConvtM6 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-15-2007, 09:56 AM
  #18  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
95Z28ConvtM6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Cherry Hill, NJ
Posts: 72
dyno sheet posted
95Z28ConvtM6 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-15-2007, 07:39 PM
  #19  
Registered User
 
mdenz3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,173
How come your curves don't cross at 5250?
mdenz3 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-15-2007, 07:52 PM
  #20  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
95Z28ConvtM6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Cherry Hill, NJ
Posts: 72
the hp and tq scales are different
95Z28ConvtM6 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-15-2007, 08:00 PM
  #21  
Registered User
 
theroad64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: The desert(for now)
Posts: 238
Originally Posted by James Montigny
Hell yeah!

When you going to get some track times for YOUR Lloyd setup?
theroad64 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-15-2007, 08:55 PM
  #22  
Banned
 
user 647483's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 1,444
Originally Posted by theroad64
When you going to get some track times for YOUR Lloyd setup?
Last weekend
http://web.camaross.com/forums/showthread.php?t=507694
And again soon when I get a few things adjusted.
user 647483 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-15-2007, 10:23 PM
  #23  
Registered User
 
94lt1redta's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 54
Very nice, gotta get me a LE cam instead of my 230/236.
94lt1redta is offline  
Reply
Old 03-15-2007, 11:32 PM
  #24  
Registered User
 
SS RRR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1998
Location: Jackstandican
Posts: 3,144
Originally Posted by James Montigny
Last weekend
http://web.camaross.com/forums/showthread.php?t=507694
And again soon when I get a few things adjusted.
Hopefully your adjustments will reflect the dyno numbers.
SS RRR is offline  
Reply
Old 03-16-2007, 12:44 AM
  #25  
Registered User
 
neil350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: T E X A S
Posts: 2,665
Thats making some power for a smog cam and cats, great job! Amazing how far LT1s have came.
neil350 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-16-2007, 10:44 AM
  #26  
Registered User
 
SS MPSTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,525
I guess 'smogability' is a relative term. Forget the cam, the fact that it has longtubes makes it 'unsmogable' in most states.
SS MPSTR is offline  
Reply
Old 03-16-2007, 11:10 AM
  #27  
Registered User
 
speed_demon24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Ocala, Florida
Posts: 3,245
Originally Posted by SS MPSTR
I guess 'smogability' is a relative term. Forget the cam, the fact that it has longtubes makes it 'unsmogable' in most states.
The cam is designed to pass the sniffer, wether or not it passes the visual and other stuff is up to the inspection shop and what mods the person has. But since you guys look for any way you can to put down LE/BRE setups I guess its a wasted effort.
speed_demon24 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-16-2007, 11:35 AM
  #28  
Registered User
 
Z-RATED94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Carol Stream, Il.
Posts: 3,557
Originally Posted by speed_demon24
The cam is designed to pass the sniffer, wether or not it passes the visual and other stuff is up to the inspection shop and what mods the person has. But since you guys look for any way you can to put down LE/BRE setups I guess its a wasted effort.
I was going to say the same thing about 1/2 hr ago, but I let it slide. Is it really worth arguing over? Do you really think he has clear proof on what states this would be legal in and or if the inspector cares as long as the car passes. Even in Ill. they don't check under the hood or use the mirror for the cats anymore.
Z-RATED94 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-16-2007, 11:54 AM
  #29  
Registered User
 
SS MPSTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,525
Originally Posted by Z-RATED94
I was going to say the same thing about 1/2 hr ago, but I let it slide. Is it really worth arguing over? Do you really think he has clear proof on what states this would be legal in and or if the inspector cares as long as the car passes. Even in Ill. they don't check under the hood or use the mirror for the cats anymore.

Removing or relocating the catalytic converter(s) is a federal violation. Look it up. Sure, you can get anything to pass with enough 'motivation' or by finding the right people, but that's not the point.

These posts (I could give a rats *** about who's cam/heads/engine) really are misleading to many when they boast these numbers with the suggestion (or flat out statement) that it is a smog-friendly set-up. A hotcam passes smog with all the equipment in place, and makes better power with long tubes, as does any other cam, stock included.
SS MPSTR is offline  
Reply
Old 03-16-2007, 12:03 PM
  #30  
Registered User
 
SS MPSTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,525
Originally Posted by speed_demon24
The cam is designed to pass the sniffer, wether or not it passes the visual and other stuff is up to the inspection shop and what mods the person has. But since you guys look for any way you can to put down LE/BRE setups I guess its a wasted effort.
I'm not putting down anyone (see post above), but questioning the smog-friendly claim in a car that is not smog friendly anyway.
SS MPSTR is offline  
Reply



Advanced Search
Quick Reply: LT1 Dyno Results


Reply Closed Thread Share

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:39 PM.