LT1 VS. LS1 in 94 Camaro
#16
Re: LT1 VS. LS1 in 94 Camaro
Originally Posted by LUDA0840
Im 17 and Im helping my father pay for the insurance. We have allstate and I think we pay $430 for 2 cars. Thats Including my Z28 over a 6 month period. But I do have all those discounts and stuff. I guess its not bad.
#18
Re: LT1 VS. LS1 in 94 Camaro
Originally Posted by ChadL
I too will be putting my parents name on any vehicle that I am to purchase. But seeing the 19yr old above having that low of insurance in his name I assume, I should be set. Checked auto trader.com and it only brought up one Z28 in my area with 78k and it was $7800. I need a 6spd, is that usually how much they run?
#22
Re: LT1 VS. LS1 in 94 Camaro
Originally Posted by blind527
He says in his first post it's a 94.
Last edited by Z95m6; 06-05-2005 at 04:04 PM. Reason: to make it easier to read
#24
Re: LT1 VS. LS1 in 94 Camaro
YOu can get an LS1 for around $8k! I'm in Central Florida,Daytona Beach Area. I checked KBB on a few cars and the asking price is always more. Does KBB not really apply to Fbodies or are people overpricing? Found a 97 Z28 w/ 93k for 7998. Best I've seen. Guess I just need to take my time and keep looking for a low mileage Z. Does the 97 just have the updated interior, and nothing else different then previous years?
Edit: Found 2 LS1's for 7,3 and 8,5.
Edit: Found 2 LS1's for 7,3 and 8,5.
#26
Re: LT1 VS. LS1 in 94 Camaro
Originally Posted by ChadL
YOu can get an LS1 for around $8k! I'm in Central Florida,Daytona Beach Area. I checked KBB on a few cars and the asking price is always more. Does KBB not really apply to Fbodies or are people overpricing? Found a 97 Z28 w/ 93k for 7998. Best I've seen. Guess I just need to take my time and keep looking for a low mileage Z. Does the 97 just have the updated interior, and nothing else different then previous years?
Edit: Found 2 LS1's for 7,3 and 8,5.
Edit: Found 2 LS1's for 7,3 and 8,5.
#27
Re: LT1 VS. LS1 in 94 Camaro
if your going to get a lt1 get a 96 or 97 because the 95 and lower are slower especially the 94's most ppl i talk to around here with 94's were running 14s stock i've never ran at the track but theres a guy here that has a srt-4 runs at 13.7 and i beat him stock (b4 my stage 3 clutch, and cai) so i'm guessing i'm somewhere 13.2-13.4ish i bought mine 2 years ago 1996 camaro z28 for 8500 with tax and all @ 68k mi and it ran flawless for 1 1/2 year till i had to do the clutch. Should be able to find one for around 7 in decent shape w/decent mi
any other questions ask away or pm me
any other questions ask away or pm me
#28
Re: LT1 VS. LS1 in 94 Camaro
Well i don't know if i just got super lucky or if you all are getting ripped off. I got my 94 Z28 for $3,000 with 177k (yes i know that's high) but it still runs perfect, even after getting the opti wet . The only thing is a nice dent in the driver door from a UPS truck.
*EDIT*
And i forgot to add, ABSOLUTELY NO RUST!
*EDIT*
And i forgot to add, ABSOLUTELY NO RUST!
Last edited by LT1-Z; 06-05-2005 at 06:09 PM.
#29
Re: LT1 VS. LS1 in 94 Camaro
Originally Posted by Kevin_315
if your going to get a lt1 get a 96 or 97 because the 95 and lower are slower especially the 94's most ppl i talk to around here with 94's were running 14s stock i've never ran at the track but theres a guy here that has a srt-4 runs at 13.7 and i beat him stock (b4 my stage 3 clutch, and cai) so i'm guessing i'm somewhere 13.2-13.4ish i bought mine 2 years ago 1996 camaro z28 for 8500 with tax and all @ 68k mi and it ran flawless for 1 1/2 year till i had to do the clutch. Should be able to find one for around 7 in decent shape w/decent mi
any other questions ask away or pm me
any other questions ask away or pm me
Actually there is no difference in performance across the years other than inconsistancy. And I highly doubt you run a 13.2-13.4 stock unless you somehow cut like a 1.4 60 on slicks without annhilating the stock 10 bolt. I have 2 buddies with 94's that were all in the high to mid 13's (13.6 best for both) with autos and CAI and catback. Your race against that SRT-4 doesn't tell you anything about your ET because the street and strip are totally different, that kids run at the track may have been his best run he'd ever had in that car and when he ran you could have been the worst he ever performed in a vehicle. I Raced a buddy in a 01 GT well modded with bolt ons that runs 13.4@103 and he only had me at his rear quarter. Now I know for a fact I don't run in the low 13's. I would assume I run about a 13.7ish with good traction right now and thats pushing it in my book. And btw I have a 95 TA m6 and made a guy in a 96 Z28 A4 with exhaust ashamed to have ever ran into me.