LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

my chances against a 2003 mustang gt?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-30-2003, 10:51 AM
  #31  
Registered User
 
97FormulaWS-6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: SLC, UT
Posts: 2,667
Well... I just crushed one the other day..... BADLY.... although it took me 1/2 way through the intersection to get traction... once I hooked, I was gone.. and he was well into my rearview.
97FormulaWS-6 is offline  
Old 04-30-2003, 10:59 AM
  #32  
Registered User
 
CANTONRACER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: North Canton, OH
Posts: 1,764
Well, woo-hoo, I crush them to...but are we not talking about sorta stock LT1 vs stock GT?
CANTONRACER is offline  
Old 04-30-2003, 11:13 AM
  #33  
Registered User
 
IrocManiac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Tulsa
Posts: 1,208
Originally posted by CANTONRACER
Well, woo-hoo, I crush them to...but are we not talking about sorta stock LT1 vs stock GT?
Exactly, there seems to be a lot of nieve (sp) people in here...I hate to break it to some of you but the new (99+) GT's have a fair amount of power. I've seen them dyno between 225 and 235 rwhp in stock trim. That translates to about 265 or so flywheel, after you figure for drivetrain loss. Remember auto LT1's put down about 235ish or so stock but weigh a good 200lbs more, the 6 speed LT1s seem to put down between 240 and 250 (seem a couple lower but in general) The newer 4.6's run good. One guy was saying he'd never seen one break a 14.8 I've never seen a newer GT (that was a 5 speed) run slower than a 14.8. Most them tend to be 14.20's and occassionaly one with a good driver will show a 13.90 or so at 101ish...
IrocManiac is offline  
Old 04-30-2003, 12:22 PM
  #34  
Registered User
 
Xride's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 1,622
I beat a 01 GT, It was my third time racing, We both got a pretty good launch, he got the better one, I spun jsut a little bit, but after that first 12' I was infront of him till I shut down.
Xride is offline  
Old 04-30-2003, 12:25 PM
  #35  
Registered User
 
CODY BEHNKE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 711
The ones that are in the high 13's and low 14's are called Cobras (99-02) no stock GT is running 13's!

Gears, cat back, CAI programming isn't stock period.
CODY BEHNKE is offline  
Old 04-30-2003, 03:40 PM
  #36  
Registered User
 
Twice The Fun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Lubbock, TX
Posts: 342
Originally posted by magius231
Not sure what year your talking about, but my slow *** 95 Vert could have managed a 14.8 if I could drive it good., and its giving up about 45HP and some weight to a new GT.
like i said, at my local track.....14.8s is good for GTs.....at 3200 ft, and the normal 5000 DA weather.....sea leavel most GTs could go low 14s.

IROCManiac, i am speaking off experience only, but even w/ catback/cai only.....i never lost to a GT, and in fact beat one of the older 4.6s (97 i think) with a 75 shot....around here the norm for GTs even with good drivers, is low 15s.

Last edited by Twice The Fun; 04-30-2003 at 03:44 PM.
Twice The Fun is offline  
Old 04-30-2003, 05:12 PM
  #37  
Registered User
 
sorryofficer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Grande Prairie
Posts: 43
Well, the only new mustang i ran was a convertible. He said he was stock, but i doubt it cause he hung with me, it was damn close. I ran a 14.7 at 98, and i was at 3400ft, that was without the cutout. This convert gt wasn't heavily modded though, his exhaust was quiet. All i know is, be on your game, get your car runnin good, practise your launch, cause if your not at your best, he'll get ya.
sorryofficer is offline  
Old 04-30-2003, 06:14 PM
  #38  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
drewstealth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Fairfield, ca
Posts: 1,623
Yeah i think it will be a close race because i have road in his car and its gets up pretty good and he hasn't even fully got on it because he is still breaking in his engine. Although i don't know how strong my car pulls when it is running good. So i can't really compare.
drewstealth is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SergheiS
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
5
09-29-2015 08:56 PM
Bxlt1
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
3
09-10-2015 08:16 AM
z28newbie
Site Help and Suggestions
1
09-09-2015 10:26 AM
z28newbie
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
1
09-09-2015 10:26 AM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
1
07-08-2015 06:47 PM



Quick Reply: my chances against a 2003 mustang gt?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:49 AM.