LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

New LT1 Tool!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-27-2008, 05:33 AM
  #16  
Guest
 
Guest47904's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 0
If you read some of the articles from TPSI you will find that they would go racing and would need to pull the engine occasionally. While at the track, out the bottom was not an option. They came up with this "tool" to make their job faster.
Guest47904 is offline  
Old 02-27-2008, 07:14 AM
  #17  
Administrator
 
Injuneer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
Posts: 70,825
New???? TPIS was selling the Happy Hooker in 1995......

Did you catch the first sentence in the article?
Owning a 1993-2002 LT1-powered Camaro or Firebird is a beautiful thing.......
Injuneer is online now  
Old 02-27-2008, 07:17 AM
  #18  
Moderator
 
Javier97Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Jupiter (NPB), Fl
Posts: 3,852
That happy hooker thing has always scared the begeesus out of me. The thought of bolting all that weight to those tiny little fuel rail bolt holes is pretty damn scary.

Out the bottom ftw.
Javier97Z28 is offline  
Old 02-27-2008, 07:22 AM
  #19  
Registered User
 
Tex95Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Killeen, Texas
Posts: 347
I have a Happy Hooker, and I like it pretty well.







No problems taking engine and tranny out togeather, though I was a little nervous about it at first, it worked quite well.
Tex95Z is offline  
Old 02-27-2008, 08:26 AM
  #20  
Registered User
 
The Engineer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Moore Oklahoma
Posts: 1,388
Originally Posted by Javier97Z28
That happy hooker thing has always scared the begeesus out of me. The thought of bolting all that weight to those tiny little fuel rail bolt holes is pretty damn scary.

Out the bottom ftw.
X2 on that! I think those fuel rail bolts are 8mm each.

WD
The Engineer is offline  
Old 02-27-2008, 04:42 PM
  #21  
Banned
 
1racerdude's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: LA (lower Alabama)
Posts: 6,661
Figure the dia of the 4 bolts together and see if you can break that dia with 600lbs.
Happy Hooker works very well. Taking the nose off depends on the length of your cherry picker. Most need the nose off.
That dia is 4x8mm=32mm=1.26in or a bit over 1-1/4" A 1-1/4" shackle is a 12 ton capacity unit and that isn't the super duty shackle.
1racerdude is offline  
Old 02-27-2008, 05:40 PM
  #22  
Moderator
 
97ChameleonTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: Valrico, FL
Posts: 307
Originally Posted by 1racerdude
Figure the dia of the 4 bolts together and see if you can break that dia with 600lbs.
Happy Hooker works very well. Taking the nose off depends on the length of your cherry picker. Most need the nose off.
That dia is 4x8mm=32mm=1.26in or a bit over 1-1/4" A 1-1/4" shackle is a 12 ton capacity unit and that isn't the super duty shackle.
Your math is wrong... The area of each 8mm bolt is 50.265 , but each bolt can snap independent of the others so totaling them isn't the same as a single bolt, but still it only comes in at 201.06. Your super duty shackle has a total area of 804.25, which is 4 times the combined 8mm bolts, however it is purpose built for lifting loads as opposed to the intake bolts that are meant to only hold the injector rails in place. The load bearing capabilities of a certain diameter of the same metal is not linear so you can't say that since the 1.25" shackle holds 12 tons then the 4 bolts should hold 3 tons. I don't think the shackle/intake bolt is a fair comparison and i'm not even touching the side loading issues.

Just my 2¢
97ChameleonTA is offline  
Old 02-27-2008, 05:50 PM
  #23  
Registered User
 
95z28_m6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: central illinois
Posts: 153
never tried pulling it out the bottom. Ive had the motor in and out the top 2 times, and the second time only took a few hours once I got the hang of it. That was with the hood and the nose on, with a cherry picker, and 4 ft of chain.
95z28_m6 is offline  
Old 02-27-2008, 05:56 PM
  #24  
Registered User
 
95Bluestreak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Jacksonville, Florida
Posts: 186
There is NO WAY I would trust that thing to pull an engine let alone an engine and tranny. Those fuel rail bolts are small to begin with and the intake isn't the hardest metal made.. I would be worrying about threads ripping out. I will stick to pulling from the bottom, however I have pulled from the top with a standard engine hoist and chain, it's not that big of a deal.
95Bluestreak is offline  
Old 02-27-2008, 06:28 PM
  #25  
Registered User
 
Tex95Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Killeen, Texas
Posts: 347
You do not use your OEM rail bolts. You use the supplied ( 8.8 3 F )stainless bolts

After removal and installation of the engine and tranny I checked out all the bolts no stretching or anything. even the supplied washers didnt bend.
Tex95Z is offline  
Old 02-27-2008, 07:54 PM
  #26  
Registered User
 
evilundisguised's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 302
Originally Posted by 97ChameleonTA
Your math is wrong... The area of each 8mm bolt is 50.265 , but each bolt can snap independent of the others so totaling them isn't the same as a single bolt, but still it only comes in at 201.06. Your super duty shackle has a total area of 804.25, which is 4 times the combined 8mm bolts, however it is purpose built for lifting loads as opposed to the intake bolts that are meant to only hold the injector rails in place. The load bearing capabilities of a certain diameter of the same metal is not linear so you can't say that since the 1.25" shackle holds 12 tons then the 4 bolts should hold 3 tons. I don't think the shackle/intake bolt is a fair comparison and i'm not even touching the side loading issues.

Just my 2¢
What units are you using? The actual bolts have a major diameter of 5.8mm, but let's give the benefit of the doubt and use the pitch diameter of 4.4mm. Assuming a (very) low tensile strength, 70ksi, stainless steel is used, I'm calculating that you could lift a 6600lb load with 4 bolts. At a small fraction of their load capacity, you can combine cross-section areas for calculation purposes because none are going to fail.

For practical purposes, load capacity (not strength) is linearly proportional to cross sectional area. The load capacity-diameter relationship is ^2 (as area relates to the square of radius).
evilundisguised is offline  
Old 02-27-2008, 07:58 PM
  #27  
Registered User
 
94zgreenmachine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Oshkosh, Wisconsin
Posts: 1,309
I pulled mine thru the top with the intake off. I used the lifter retainer bosses in the lifter valley. They are a 5/16 thread, I believe. I'll be pulling mine again in the next few weeks. Missing clips for the comp r's
94zgreenmachine is offline  
Old 02-27-2008, 08:55 PM
  #28  
Registered User
 
87bandit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Palm Harbor, FL
Posts: 660
Originally Posted by danhr
out the bottom is so freakin easy. I was intimidated at first, but now I can do one under under 3 or 4 hours. that's without the aid of a lift, and me working solo.
how high does the car need to be raised?
87bandit is offline  
Old 02-27-2008, 09:53 PM
  #29  
Registered User
 
danhr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 1,109
Originally Posted by 87bandit
how high does the car need to be raised?
pretty much the highest you can get it. I used a 5 ton jack, got it the highest it will go, put a set of jackstands underneath it, and that was enough. That and a large friend sitting on the back bumper
danhr is offline  
Old 02-28-2008, 08:21 AM
  #30  
Administrator
 
Injuneer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
Posts: 70,825
Out the bottom "how to"...

http://www.cardomain.com/ride/348183/6
Injuneer is online now  


Quick Reply: New LT1 Tool!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:51 PM.