LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Piston Choice...Too Much Compression?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-18-2007, 03:31 PM
  #16  
Moderator
 
rskrause's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Buffalo, New York
Posts: 10,745
Originally Posted by FlamingChicken
im off today so ive been doing nothing but sitting in front of this damn computer weighing my options. sounds like a custom piston might be my best bet. ive already dropped way too much money into this car and i want it to perform the best it can so no compromising unless i have to. a 9cc piston volume would give me 12.1:1 with a .035 gasket which sounds decent. i think the reason my chambers are so small is because of how much they were milled. looking at the spec sheet it says they were decked .032". any recommendations on a company to do a custom set of pistons? preferably less than $1k to make, closer to $800. Ron also said they might be able to change valves and with a vj gain a few cc's
Just have Cometic to make you up a set of 0.050" gasket. That will save you a lot of $$$ and the extra quench will not make a rats *** of difference.

Rich
rskrause is offline  
Old 06-18-2007, 06:29 PM
  #17  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
FlamingChicken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 119
i thought one of the main reasons you ran a tight quench was to resist detonation? if thats not true why do people recommend setting up quench distance of ~.03-.04? just trying to learn not, questioning your knowledge by any means
FlamingChicken is offline  
Old 06-18-2007, 07:16 PM
  #18  
Moderator
 
rskrause's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Buffalo, New York
Posts: 10,745
Originally Posted by FlamingChicken
i thought one of the main reasons you ran a tight quench was to resist detonation? if thats not true why do people recommend setting up quench distance of ~.03-.04? just trying to learn not, questioning your knowledge by any means
0.040" is a practical minimum. I have not seen a significant difference between 0.040 and 0.050". Think about a stock LT1, the quench is close to 60 thousandths and it runs pretty well.

Rich
rskrause is offline  
Old 06-18-2007, 09:33 PM
  #19  
Registered User
 
95fbformula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 111
Also to add a quench off .035 is to small with a true zero decked block you run the risk of slapping a piston at high rpm minimum i would go on a zero decked block with that chamber size is .039 which i believe most people use
95fbformula is offline  
Old 06-19-2007, 04:22 AM
  #20  
Moderator
 
rskrause's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Buffalo, New York
Posts: 10,745
And to add some more. You better check each hole individually if you aare trying for a quench as tight as 0.039". There is often variation of up to 0.005-0.007" from one hole to another. This reflects the precision of the machining, stacking of tolerances, etc. 0.035" is about the thickness of a 3x5 index card. If you try to run a very thight quench, even something as "minor" as a little extra piston to bore clearance can cause contact between the piston and the head due to piston rock.

In any case, I don't see any practical difference between 0.040 and 0.050" in a situation like this. Just my $0.020.

Rich
rskrause is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
surreybrad
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
1
09-29-2015 09:00 PM
Z Power
LT1 Based Engine Tech
8
09-19-2015 11:19 PM
DelSoto
Forced Induction
4
09-19-2015 05:31 AM
95craz28
Fuel and Ignition
11
09-12-2015 07:47 AM
Daluchman1974
Cars For Sale
1
09-11-2015 06:12 AM



Quick Reply: Piston Choice...Too Much Compression?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:27 PM.