LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Problems with Comp Pro Mag 1.6's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-13-2009, 06:02 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
dr97z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: North Platte, NE
Posts: 181
Problems with Comp Pro Mag 1.6's

Has anyone ever had issues with Comp Pro Mag 1.6 rockers. I was having some issues with them coming loose at first, when I went in and re-lashed, I noticed theirs a metal powder coming out around the trunion. AFR said they don't like the Pro Mags, because they claim weight savings, but they don't think they do. They said they tend to bounce around at high RPM's and recommend switching to an aluminum rocker for my setup. They also said the cam is very agressive on the valve train, so keep this in mind. The thing pulls nice and clean on the dyno up to 6500 then seems like a missfire, maybe floating valves, but valve springs are plenty for application, could the rockers be causing this. At 6500, I have not peaked out yet.
dr97z is offline  
Old 04-13-2009, 08:17 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
wrd1972's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Kantuckee Yo'
Posts: 4,405
The pro-mags do weigh more than aluminum rockers so yes they will float valves more easily and at a lower RPM than aluminum rockers because of funamental physics. Also they tend to make more clicking noises than aluminum rockers.
wrd1972 is offline  
Old 04-13-2009, 08:30 PM
  #3  
Registered User
 
Stl94LT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: O'Fallon, MO
Posts: 1,083
Overall the Pro Mag's weigh more than Al rockers. But, Comp claims the weight over the valve is less.
Stl94LT1 is offline  
Old 04-13-2009, 08:34 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
wrd1972's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Kantuckee Yo'
Posts: 4,405
Originally Posted by Stl94LT1
Overall the Pro Mag's weigh more than Al rockers. But, Comp claims the weight over the valve is less.
I think that statement by Comp is smoke and mirrors and marketing. If the thing weighs more, laws of inertia still exist.
wrd1972 is offline  
Old 04-13-2009, 08:46 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
1989TransAm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 220
"I think that statement by Comp is smoke and mirrors and marketing. If the thing weighs more, laws of inertia still exist. "

Interesting that Comp brought out a new line of aluminum rocker arms last year. I have also heard the same thing about the Pro-Mags and that is why I'm going with aluminum rocker arms.

Sounds like you are running into valve float. If you are getting powdered metal from the rocker arm it needs to be replaced. You don't need metal floating around in the oil and a rocker arm on the verge of failure.
1989TransAm is offline  
Old 04-13-2009, 08:52 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
evilundisguised's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 302
Originally Posted by wrd1972
I think that statement by Comp is smoke and mirrors and marketing. If the thing weighs more, laws of inertia still exist.
I can't confirm or deny Comp's claims, but there is a difference between overall weight and moment of inertia. Mass has more effect on inertia the further you get from the axis of rotation, so the "weight over the valve" statement could be more significant than total weight.
evilundisguised is offline  
Old 04-13-2009, 09:40 PM
  #7  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
dr97z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: North Platte, NE
Posts: 181
cam calls for installed height of 1.750 = 100 on seat, which I've talked to Lloyd about it and he says no way.

I'm using AFR 8019's installed height of 1.800 - 1.810 = 155 on seat. All, Lunati, AFR, and Lloyd all say that should be good.

The only thing I see as a problem is metal coming from rocker arm and AFR's statement about pro mags.
dr97z is offline  
Old 04-13-2009, 09:48 PM
  #8  
Registered User
 
shoebox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Little Rock, AR
Posts: 27,714
If you have a bad rocker, then by all means, you should get it repaired. You preload setting can affect valve float.

There are an awful lot of people running Pro Mags that don't complain about float.
shoebox is offline  
Old 04-13-2009, 11:04 PM
  #9  
Registered User
 
1989TransAm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 220
"There are an awful lot of people running Pro Mags that don't complain about float."

I agree. But than again how many rpms are they turning. It could be subtle and they may not know it is happening in the higher rpms unless on a dyno. In this case we are talking 6500rpm.
1989TransAm is offline  
Old 04-13-2009, 11:17 PM
  #10  
Administrator
 
Injuneer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
Posts: 70,825
My Pro-Mags were installed with the stroker build in 2000. The engine has a 7,200rpm redline and runs all the way to 7,000rpm shift points on nitrous. Running a mild solid roller cam. I've never had any problems with them. It was a daily driver for aobut 2 years, but since then have had very limited track time and a bit of local driving.
Injuneer is online now  
Old 04-13-2009, 11:19 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
ACE1252's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Kernersville, NC
Posts: 2,063
Originally Posted by 1989TransAm
"There are an awful lot of people running Pro Mags that don't complain about float."

I agree. But than again how many rpms are they turning. It could be subtle and they may not know it is happening in the higher rpms unless on a dyno. In this case we are talking 6500rpm.
Isn't that a spring problem instead of a rocker problem?
ACE1252 is offline  
Old 04-13-2009, 11:46 PM
  #12  
Registered User
 
1989TransAm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 220
Not necessarily. Valve train weight will also cause valve float.
1989TransAm is offline  
Old 04-14-2009, 06:45 AM
  #13  
Registered User
 
shoebox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Little Rock, AR
Posts: 27,714
Originally Posted by 1989TransAm
"There are an awful lot of people running Pro Mags that don't complain about float."

I agree. But than again how many rpms are they turning. It could be subtle and they may not know it is happening in the higher rpms unless on a dyno. In this case we are talking 6500rpm.
I obviously don't know how many RPM they are turning. I was just pointing out that so many people are running them, that chances of the problem being the rocker is not logical (IMHO). You have to figure that a lot of these are race engines and see plenty of high RPM. As Fred/Injuneer indicated, his properly set up valvetrain with Pro Mags has no issues.

With the way the internet community is, if there was an issue with Pro Mags, everyone would be avoiding them like the plague.
shoebox is offline  
Old 04-14-2009, 08:14 AM
  #14  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
dr97z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: North Platte, NE
Posts: 181
So even if it's not a weight issue, something could be going on in the rocker for it to be wearing enough to have have that metal powder around the trunion, right. I just don't know what would be doing this. These rockers were on my last motor that I had numerous valvetrain issues on (which I didn't set up myself)
dr97z is offline  
Old 04-14-2009, 10:23 AM
  #15  
Registered User
 
shoebox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Little Rock, AR
Posts: 27,714
You need to dissect the rocker(s) to see what the issue is. Maybe oiling or ?? Comp can rebuild them for you.
shoebox is offline  


Quick Reply: Problems with Comp Pro Mag 1.6's



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:02 PM.