LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Racetronix vs Aeromotive

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-23-2005, 02:53 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
JustNO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,025
Question Racetronix vs Aeromotive

-- #FLT1-FPK2 Racetronix Fuel System w/ 255 LPH High-Pressure Fuel Pump and Series II Plug-&-Play Wiring Harness (includes chassis ground & booster pump plug-&-play option), LT1 F-body + Aeromotive Fuel Pressure Regulator.

-- #17102 Aeromotive Complete Fuel System, 1994-1997 LT1 F-body

With which one I should go ??? Aeromotive includes Aeromotive fuel pressure regulator.. If I go with racetronix Kit ,I also will go with Aeromotive Fuel P. Regulator..

Link for details: http://www.thunderracing.com/catalog...vid=4&pcid=166

Any suggestion will be great

thanks
JustNO is offline  
Old 05-23-2005, 04:17 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
markinkc69z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Shawnee Kansas
Posts: 849
Re: Racetronix vs Aeromotive

What are your expectations of the car? If you're looking to make an honest 450-500 hp and leave it at that level I would recommend the in-tank setup. If you are planning on some kind of forced induction setup in the future and really plan on leaning on it (500+ hp under belt driven boost) then you should consider our complete fuel system.
markinkc69z is offline  
Old 05-23-2005, 04:42 PM
  #3  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
JustNO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,025
Re: Racetronix vs Aeromotive

383cid LT4 AFR 210cc competiton Heads with 237/245dur. 582/592lifts 113lsa .. I hope it will be ~540hp at flywheel..
JustNO is offline  
Old 05-23-2005, 04:52 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
markinkc69z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Shawnee Kansas
Posts: 849
Re: Racetronix vs Aeromotive

Then I think a Walbro 255 would be a good choice. Don't get me wrong, we would love to have you install our fuel system, but the intank for your combination would get the job done.
markinkc69z is offline  
Old 05-23-2005, 04:57 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
BADST95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Naperville, IL, USA
Posts: 584
Thumbs up Re: Racetronix vs Aeromotive

I used the Racetronix twin in tank pump set up and it works fine. I have have more than enough fuel. I used the stock lines too.
BADST95 is offline  
Old 05-23-2005, 04:58 PM
  #6  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
JustNO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,025
Re: Racetronix vs Aeromotive

Originally Posted by markinkc69z
Then I think a Walbro 255 would be a good choice. Don't get me wrong, we would love to have you install our fuel system, but the intank for your combination would get the job done.
Ohh dear.... I'm very suprised.. You are very honest.. thank you for this!!
BTW: racetronix kit does not include AFPR.. So it can be your AFPR right? With out a problem?
JustNO is offline  
Old 05-23-2005, 09:09 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
markinkc69z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Shawnee Kansas
Posts: 849
Re: Racetronix vs Aeromotive

Absolutely. #13107
markinkc69z is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RUENUF
Cars For Sale
6
03-13-2016 03:37 PM
Quickss96
Cars For Sale
6
01-29-2016 05:56 PM
form94
Parts For Sale
2
09-23-2015 07:30 AM
IDOXLR8
Forced Induction
0
01-31-2003 11:28 AM
Flyin t/a
N2O Tech
2
09-30-2002 06:07 PM



Quick Reply: Racetronix vs Aeromotive



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:42 AM.