Racetronix vs Aeromotive
#1
Racetronix vs Aeromotive
-- #FLT1-FPK2 Racetronix Fuel System w/ 255 LPH High-Pressure Fuel Pump and Series II Plug-&-Play Wiring Harness (includes chassis ground & booster pump plug-&-play option), LT1 F-body + Aeromotive Fuel Pressure Regulator.
-- #17102 Aeromotive Complete Fuel System, 1994-1997 LT1 F-body
With which one I should go ??? Aeromotive includes Aeromotive fuel pressure regulator.. If I go with racetronix Kit ,I also will go with Aeromotive Fuel P. Regulator..
Link for details: http://www.thunderracing.com/catalog...vid=4&pcid=166
Any suggestion will be great
thanks
-- #17102 Aeromotive Complete Fuel System, 1994-1997 LT1 F-body
With which one I should go ??? Aeromotive includes Aeromotive fuel pressure regulator.. If I go with racetronix Kit ,I also will go with Aeromotive Fuel P. Regulator..
Link for details: http://www.thunderracing.com/catalog...vid=4&pcid=166
Any suggestion will be great
thanks
#2
Re: Racetronix vs Aeromotive
What are your expectations of the car? If you're looking to make an honest 450-500 hp and leave it at that level I would recommend the in-tank setup. If you are planning on some kind of forced induction setup in the future and really plan on leaning on it (500+ hp under belt driven boost) then you should consider our complete fuel system.
#4
Re: Racetronix vs Aeromotive
Then I think a Walbro 255 would be a good choice. Don't get me wrong, we would love to have you install our fuel system, but the intank for your combination would get the job done.
#6
Re: Racetronix vs Aeromotive
Originally Posted by markinkc69z
Then I think a Walbro 255 would be a good choice. Don't get me wrong, we would love to have you install our fuel system, but the intank for your combination would get the job done.
BTW: racetronix kit does not include AFPR.. So it can be your AFPR right? With out a problem?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post