LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Removing Traction Control

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-20-2005, 12:07 PM
  #16  
Registered User
 
Lee96Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: San Jose Area, CA
Posts: 52
Re: Removing Traction Control

Originally Posted by Alvin@pcmforless.com
Because your not cutting the engines throat with 20 degrees of timing retard. Pick up a service manual and you'll see what we are talking about. Your basically saying the same thing as.. someone programmed my computer to make my windows to roll up faster.
I ask an honest question and you come back with that kind of response. Thanks. That was helpful.
Lee96Z28 is offline  
Old 10-20-2005, 12:54 PM
  #17  
Registered User
 
Alvin@pcmforless.com's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 1,614
Re: Removing Traction Control

I gave you a honest answer...
Alvin@pcmforless.com is offline  
Old 10-20-2005, 12:55 PM
  #18  
Registered User
 
CamaroBoy96Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Madison Heights, MI
Posts: 2,356
Re: Removing Traction Control

You said it yourself that Bryan softened the ASR "intensity" basically half answering your own question. Which is the only portion of the system that the PCM has anything to do with. I think what you're not getting is that the EBCM tucked up by the dead pedal is the main control for the ASR function supplemented by the ASR motor on the driver's valve cover which pushes back on your accelerator and timing retard from the PCM. That control module is what makes the whole ASR elimination a huge pain in the ***.

The EBCM is a flat silver box with in the case of an ASR equipped car, 3 plugs and then 2 for a non ASR equipped car. I'll refer to ASR/TCS by its GM RPO code NW9. The NW9 and non-NW9 optioned car have the same 2 plugs only differing by the 3rd which is for the ASR function. Previously in the thread someone mentioned just swapping the non-NW9 EBCM in there and it worked which makes sense due to the fact that engineers arent going to overhaul the ABS system just to add the function therefor only another plug/harness was added to the EBCM and minor changes throughout the ABS system to accept ASR.

After looking at the ABS/ASR diagram in my chilton's last winter I theorized that would work, simply eliminating the ASR part of the ABS system as they are intertwined. I have a non-ASR EBCM that i've been meaning to try it out. I'll put it in tomorrow and see what happens.
CamaroBoy96Z28 is offline  
Old 10-20-2005, 03:11 PM
  #19  
Registered User
 
TW95Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 121
Re: Removing Traction Control

Doesn't ASR also apply the rear brakes to limit wheelspin (maybe only in extreme cases), in addition to the above mentioned things?
Yes that's why cars with ASR have two rear brake lines running from the front (one to each rear wheel) vs one line that splits on the axle to each wheel for just ABS.

Physically, here's what I did to remove both ABS and ASR.
http://www.pharmacy.arizona.edu/staf.../NoABSTCS.html

Tim
TW95Z is offline  
Old 10-20-2005, 08:44 PM
  #20  
Registered User
 
Dave '97 Z28 M6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: S. Ontario, Canada
Posts: 953
Re: Removing Traction Control

Originally Posted by Lee96Z28
OK. Then explain to me why my car with the Ed Wright programming pushes back less on my foot if I spin the tires with the ASR on. That is the throttle cable relaxer in action.
Did Ed do anything (mechanically) with the throttle cable relaxer?

I've noticed that my (untouched) ASR doesn't seem to kick back the pedal quite as much after switching to an aftermarket TB. Is that a possible explanation?
Dave '97 Z28 M6 is offline  
Old 10-20-2005, 08:54 PM
  #21  
Registered User
 
Dave '97 Z28 M6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: S. Ontario, Canada
Posts: 953
Re: Removing Traction Control

Originally Posted by CamaroBoy96Z28
You said it yourself that Bryan softened the ASR "intensity"...
Just to clarify, it was Ed Wright who did Lee's programming. I was the one who wrongfully brought Bryan's name into this.
Originally Posted by CamaroBoy96Z28
...makes sense due to the fact that engineers arent going to overhaul the ABS system just to add the function therefor only another plug/harness was added to the EBCM and minor changes throughout the ABS system to accept ASR.
But I thought they did change the ABS quite a bit... going from a 3-channel (non-ASR) to a 4-channel ABS setup for the ASR cars.
Dave '97 Z28 M6 is offline  
Old 10-20-2005, 09:14 PM
  #22  
Registered User
 
CamaroBoy96Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Madison Heights, MI
Posts: 2,356
Re: Removing Traction Control

Thats the only difference. Not much of a drastic change. i was more referring to the electrical side but you are correct on the 4-ch reluctor rings on both axels and 3-ch with one on the center section of the rear which complete the ABS only setup mechanically.
CamaroBoy96Z28 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Rod Bender
Drivetrain
3
11-07-2023 02:30 PM
dluna333
Parts Wanted
2
03-06-2015 07:11 AM
Jlo
Parts For Sale
7
02-03-2015 09:41 PM
squarehead
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
7
01-15-2015 07:02 PM
chevroletfreak
LT1 Based Engine Tech
202
07-04-2005 05:00 PM



Quick Reply: Removing Traction Control



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:28 PM.